Bollywood, there is a diff between nepotism and access. - Page 5

Here you are. You not understanding the difference between access and nepotism is somewhat understandable. But it is a downright insult to talent for Vicky’s merit to be compared to Jahnvi.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

I don’t follow reviews.

You know why ? Because the Anupama everyone is criticizing is a reviewer.

In this very thread you’re telling me this woman Anupama is thrash. But now the reviews of her and her ilk are important ? Their not lol and that’s counter intuitive lol

I am going to show you the public opinion if you didn’t jump to conclusions. I am sure you don’t follow that either. Thus Vicky’s merit is comparable able to one of the most talentless nepo products ever.

Anupama was also stupid enough to praise Jhanvi and Varun in Bawaal. Unfortunately no one from the public agreed. It is clear she licks the ass of nepo products

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

I am going to show you the public opinion if you didn’t jump to conclusions. I am sure you don’t follow that either. Thus Vicky’s merit is comoat able to one of the most talentless nepo products ever.

Your jumping to conclusions about me cause I don’t agree with you

Anupama has as much credibility as Fox News.

Saying all Nepos are created equal is like saying the son of Google's CEO & Googles Janitor have equal access to resources because they both work for Google.

Star Kids get it all. The directors/producers kids are next. Then supporting actors, musicians. The rest have to struggle more or less like everyone else.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

I always bee able to make up my own mind

Once again you in your mind also think Salman khan is a great actor . Of course you are going to think Vicky and Jhanvi are at par. Unfortunately, one person thinking something does not prove anything. Most people who have studied film making would laugh at the idea of Jhanvi Kapoor being compared to Vicky.

I'm not even talking about talent. No one's going to claim Karthik is any great talent. But can anyone say he didn't hustle to get where he is? Vicky had it slightly better because he would've known who to call, and a few directors would at least go through his portfolio without throwing it in the trash right away.

But actual nepo babies would simply have to put the word out, and films come to them.

I'm not even arguing that's unfair. Those em the breaks.

My question is why is this Anupama chick conflating Vicky's access to nepo babies' privilege and minimizing his hard work?

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Your jumping to conclusions about me cause I don’t agree with you

What conclusions did I jump to about you ?

Originally posted by: Grumpydwarf24

Once again you in your mind also think Salman khan is a great actor .

What about last year when everyone was sure Sid Or Vicky would win the filmfare award. An I took one look at the nominations an knew Ranveer would. An he won

Taste is subjective. But perhaps I know how Bollywood works