Originally posted by: Vidhi1989
And.. "yes, visible proof jaruri hain!" Bhale DV ki definition me mental, emotional, financial abuse shamil ho par aap use visibly kaise sabit karengi ki ye abuse hai?
Even maar pitai ke baad case file karne par aap pati se alag rah rahe hote hain.. jis din pitai hoti hai, usi din kisi aurat ke man me case file karne ka khyal aata bhi nahi hai. Bahut baad me wo case file karti hai. To wo medical saboot bhi nahi banwa paati. Aur usually Doctors women ke favor me certificates banate bhi nahi. Medical fraternity women ke against hi kaam karti hai.
Domestic violence ke cases me women aksar hospital nahi jaati, aur Doctor se bhi jhooth bolti hain ki kaam ke dauran fisal gaye the yahi sab. Aur Doctors bhi Maan jate hain. They are not very progressive people out there. Doctor ko jab Tak bataya na jaye ya wo khud aisa report me na likhe to you can't have medical proof... Aur later date me jab jakhm bhar jate hain to tab to koi doctor waise bhi verify nahi kar sakta.
Fir Defence lawyer pati ki or se aise certificates ko challenge karte hain. Tab tak ghaav bhar jate hain to isliye ye sab aasan nahi hota proof karna. Ulte women ki dimaagi halat par sawal khade karne wale certificates pesh kar diye jate hain. Doctors jhuthe mental illness ke kagaj bana dete hain aaram se. Aur Indian family court mental illness ke mamle me modern understanding se nahi old school mentality se kaam lete hain, jahan aise kisi vyakti ko unreliable aur potentially violent samjha jata hai.
Jabki mental illness has nothing to with someone's capacity to differentiate b/w reality and fiction and make them violent (it is related to very specific cases and even then you can't invalidate them entirely).
Yaha par khud hi log mental illness ka majak bana rahe hain ye kahkar ki Sahiba might have it that's why she is accepting abuse. Isse jyada uninformed baate maine aaj taj tak nahi suni.
Psychological trauma aur psychiatric illness me bahut fark hota hai pahli baar.. aur India me violence norm hai, isliye ye bhi exactly nahi kah sakte ki Sahiba is psychologically traumatized in real sense. Jab kisi society me violence bahut acceptable ho to waha trauma ke liye kuch aisa hona jaruri hai jo insaan ke dimag/man ko khud violence lage.
Jis cheez ko ham khud galat nahi samjhte, usse hame kyo bura lagne lagega?
Trauma ke cases me kai baar saalo baad asar hota hai jab ensaan waqt ke saath apni soch aur world view me badal jata hai aur naye sire se apne emotions ko process karta hai to wahi old memories haunt karti hain. Par aisa bhi sabke saath nahi hota kyonki jyadatar log samay ke saath badalte hi nahi.
Isiliye bhi India me violence bhale bahut jyada ho par uska impact sab me ek jaisa dikhta bhi nahi hai. Iska matlab ye nahi hai ki kuch log so called strong hain, kuch weak.. yaha baat ye hai ki jyadatar log violence ko "part and parcel of life" ki tarah dekhte hain, use violence samjhte hi nahi aur we khud bhi violent hote hain dusro ke liye. Ise parents ke case me sabse achhe se samjh sakte hain.
Pahle aap apne parents se harsh treatment pao, aur aisi upbringing ko ideal samjho aur apne bachho ke sath bhi yahi Karo. Aur Ghar me koi aisi upbringing par sawal kare, ise abuse kahe to sab use pagal kahenge. Kyonki jyadatar ko lagta hai ki wo life me kuch behtar kar sake hain to isi maar Peet se!
South asia me women aur children ko maarna peetna, unhe verbally abuse karna, control karna.. ye sab violence nahi balki ise expression of care maana jata hai. Jab tak mamla had se jyada na bad jaye yani Jaan maal ka khatara na ho aur abuse hi abuse ho (jabki normal sense me abuse ke saath 2 display of affection bhi hota hai), aur sexual component bhi jud jaye tab jakar ise violence samjha jayega! Warna nahi.
Rahi baat ek aurat ko uski manmarji ka jivan jeene se rokne ki.. to aisa majority gharo me hota hai. Technically ye violence to hai par India me ise Sanskar kahte hain, violence nahi. Kyonki aisa to court bhi manti hai ki women ko family ke hisab se rahna chahiye, that is the reason ki marital rape abhi tak rape kyo nahi mana jata!