I believe this is the issue, the audience is discussing and thinking stuff which was never a part of the show
1) Pakhi didn't kill Sai or her son
It was an accident and for all purpose, she was stopping Sai from leaving the house
Sai got on the bus on her own and left the house on her own, none asked her to do that
The show never says that Pakhi killed Sai or Vinayak but we are seeing her as a killer then there's huge disconnect between story and audience
2) Again, Pakhi wasn't Virat's lover, he didn't throw Sai out of the house for his lover, he didn't throw her out at all, Sai left
I am not singling you out, I just want to understand why is there this huge gap between the show and its audience?
yes dear I get you .. in the end fate did not support Sai n virat .. they had played this game too many times ..
Last Ganpati.. which according to Neil happened 7 years ago .. Sai left the house got in an accident .. virat n family prayed and she recovered miraculously
So many issues still happened .. Shruti , landmine then samrat killing .. and then surrogacy .. issues were never resolved properly ..
Maybe if virat had found out about Sai .. he would have brought her back .. but would the family forgive her for getting vinu killed
Would Savi be Born ..
Things could a bad turn .. Sai got the required time to cool down , give birth and focus on her life goals ..
And virat got the family he always prioritised over Sai ., so is he happy .. he can have his own biological child with pakhi both are capable ., nothing wrong with them .. why are they not going ahead ..
This was needed to be shown in the leap .,