Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Rana Ayyub does have many articulate and valid journalistic think pieces. This is not one of them.
Ever since I was a child, I remember Indian movies having caricaturish and simplistic depictions of the religious divides in India. They are always black and white with very little room for grey. They say simplistically divide a diverse population into good Indians and bad Indians. Sooryavanshi is not the first movie to do this nor will it be the last movie to do this. And these movies are always a hit.
It's not just religion, it is just how masala movies deal with social issues in general. Simmba too was a loud rape-revenge story. It completely lacked nuance and fed into the Madonna-whore duality of Indian society.
I think the better topic and the bigger question is - why the continued success of masala films with oversimplified and often problematic depictions of social issues should worry us.
The reason why such things are an issue right now is that in the past India was just a pot of water. It could spill, splish, and splash but was typically harmless. Under the current regime, India is a pot of boiling water. The molecules are all agitated and constantly vibrating. It doesn't take much to boil over, burn, and scald.
Now that is a topic, worth the debate!
NOT this which seemed to have been put together with a single pointed agenda of somehow victimizing the Muslims and blaming the majority- that too for what? for watching a stupid movie.
34