Shivangi Khedkar{Pallavi} AT #67-✨ | Stardust Soul | ✨ - Page 63

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

32k

Users

30

Likes

4k

Frequent Posters

joliefemme thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: MistyDawn

Parul I totally get what you're saying.. I think its the way Im expressing my thoughts, clearly failing at it lol Im not nit picking on incidents that would justify why she should or should not blindly trust him.. Its human to make mistakes and do wrong, err in your judgement..doesn't mean you're a bad person., or you don't love the other person or wanna break his/trust.. they both have done mistakes and will continue to do so.. so to say ''mera ghamandi rao kuchh galat kar hi nahi sakta'' is exaggerated sentiment for someone like me who thinks practically.. maybe for the character Pallavi it is not.. Raghav has shown tremendous growth as a person post marriage.. but he still has had moments where he has made an error of judgement not just in matters related to Keerthi, but during Mandhar track too.. his heart has always been in the right place even if his ways may be questionable..maybe that's what I would've loved to hear from her ''tumhare irade galat nahi hote..bhale hi tareeke se mein hamesha ittefaq na rakhu'' like the tracker things when he wanted to keep a tab on her during Mandhar track..that was for her own safety.. Its not the trust but the over emphasis (through dialogues) and exaggeration of it, which I found off..that's it. I feel its for drama purpose.

Wanna say more..but Im at work so will have to wrap this up..


Vaishali, I think she does say a dialogue similar to the fact your intent is right but not ways today?? Correct me if I'm wrong.


Also, I'm also a very practical person and hence I get what you're trying to say. Her blind faith is something a practical person won't be able to relate to. It feels OTT and exaggerated. It is not about how many instances have happened in the past, it's more of how you are as a person - less trusting and more idk, aware?


I also get what Parul is trying to say coz I was an emotional person few yrs back. Sometimes you're helpless in love that you can't see the obvious signs also and it's easier to trust. It's sad that Pals will be so let down because of this trust she placed in him.

SONIA441 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: -abz-

Also, Nikhil has a soft corner in my heart.

Sonia, he's mentally doing bungee jumping with me in an alternate universe.

In another parallel world, he's dancing with you.


Bunjee jumping toh hum Dost & Behen ke saath bhi karte hain.

Naya Bhai mubaraq ho tumhe😆


Ofcourse, in this world too Nikhil's slow dancing only with me

unicornwriter thumbnail
Rocker Thumbnail 4th Anniversary Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Wilddreams

🤫🤫 hum shore wale chupke se Sama ki lifejackets wali boat mein aa gaye the 😌

Haina Sama 😳

Always to the rescue ⛑️

Inese_20 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: joliefemme


Totally agree with everything you've written specially bold.


He is going to drown in the guilt eventually. Right now he's in denial, he was shocked when Abhishek's mother burned the money. Nothing Raghav will do will ever compensate her loss (I'm not pinning the blame but when he's feeling the guilt, this will happen).


Pallavi cannot and should not abandon him then. We all know what happened when he was abandoned at 17.


you know it’s too early to say whether Pallavi cannot/should not abandon him because it depends a lot on how would Raghav react when all this comes out. See Pallavi would already be very hurt because she was lied to, a promise was broken and moreover her husband’s business was the reason a person got killed in front of her eyes. After all this, If Ragahv goes in a defensive mode, is not guilty at all and instead blurts out things he said in the precap, then I can’t imagine how will Pallavi be able to stay? That’s super hurtful. If he tells her that she loves him for his money and still Pallavi somehow finds it in herself to stay back at his house - then it would be whole another level of determination towards the marriage. Which I for one won’t be able to understand. Will have to try hard. I mean my instant reaction would be to walk out. He literally questioned her whole existence in that one sentence? I mean Raghav has his issues for sure, but so does Pallavi! She is as much a human as he is.


lol Ren you just said you are a very practical person. Would you still stay, if you are in Pallavi’s shoes?

If Ragahv is being not so disrespectful, then I can see how she will be able to still try for him.

Edited by Inese_20 - 3 years ago
missFiesty_69 thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: SONIA441


The ACP is being held accountable by her Office. Atleast Thanks to the CVs for showing that.

But noone else is questioning the Police yet because they don't know what was Abhishek involved in. His mother, Pallavi & Nikhil all think that he was involved in some pretty shitty business cos he got killed in a Police Encounter, which he wasn't. A Customs-Tax evasion never & I repeat, never involves a shoot at sight order. You jail people, you interrogate them but you don't shoot- And I would want the Mother & Sister to address this specifically for the ACP. He wasn't a Terrorist & right now people can assume anything which is wrong even for the life that was snubbed out so brutally to satisfy someone's ego to catch a Businessman for his WhiteCollar Crimes.


I actually don't remember about this conversation during Mandaar's track, so can't say anything'bt that now.


Raghav isn't responsible for Abhishek's death. The onus lies only on the ACP's foolhardy actions & slightly on Abhishek. I have already stated each one of my reasons in Kiara's thread & it became pretty long cos of how back I went in.


I'll just restate one of the points I put out there - I don't believe that stealing a document & murdering people can be equated as the same kind of crime even if the law states otherwise in certain states. Nope, there's a big difference & thankfully, our country also agrees to that in comparison to other nations of the world(read the ones that consider themselves worthy of the title of Developed Nations).


Finding a leeway to save taxes is as different as chalk & cheese than comparing it to a murder. Even if we consider Raghav a criminal, I (because of my above opinions) believe that there're several levels of being one & Raghav might come under Stage1/2 but not at Stage10 (1 being lowest & 10 the highest).


I agree about this being a wonderful track. Hope the CVs are able to showcase realities than just making him a sinner/liar. Didn't like the extra dubbed last minute dialogue addition in Today's scene that he's lying to Pallavi even after promising her that he would pay the custom-duty charges. It suddenly adds another angle of him being a lying spouse rather than just addressing about the way his Business runs.

I just have a question here. How does it matter now? Will somebody's remorse or guilt bring back a life that was brutally taken? Does it matter anyway?

Raghav is indirectly responsible for Abhishek's death. Abishek worked for Raghav. If Raghav was a law-abiding citizen, then he is not involved. But here Abishek got shot because he was doing Raghav's job. Raghav may not have any hand in his shooting but he definitely has a hand in Abhishek's death, but not wholly. He should be remorseful atleast.

fria319 thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: -abz-

Yes he is guilty. He's guilty for breaking her trust upon him. That was the disappointment. Pallavi was concerned about Abhishek's family while Raghav was guilt tripping over Pallavi's reaction.

His talk with lungi wala Raghav made one point clear. He's afraid of loosing Pallavi and it's eating him up. This is the reason why I'm disappointed in him. We all know Raghav has always been insecure about Pallavi leaving him. But his reaction to Abhishek's mother was unsatisfying. Either it is a bad writing or there is more to the story.

This makes me think, they are putting us in confusion. We cannot tell until we know what Abhishek was involved in. There can be bigger hands behind if we give a thought. Raghav would have been doing a silly stuff (to which he is guilty for) and Raghav might get framed in a bigger loop.


I saw guilt and remorse as soon as Farhad told him and when he went to the house. In the bathroom scene - yes that was about lying to Pallavi. But before that, him helping Abhishek’s family, him insisting on going to his house - I think they were all actions stemming from his guilt and remorse. Even at the abisheks house I do think he looked guilty and remorseful.

I just don’t expect him to be soo emotionally distraught over Abisheks death (as he was about other things they’ve shown) bc he wasn’t emotionally tied to Abhishek. He feels bad, but we’re not going to see him be distraught over it just yet.

I think he’s looking at this as an unfortunate accident. If your Uber driver died in a car accident by running a red light to get you your order, how sad are you really going to be? That’s what I kind of equate it to.

As an employer he feels bad, but he didn’t know Abhishek well to be drinking his feelings away. I think it will creep up on him.

But yeah it could be that this is about something else bigger. That would be an interesting take.

Edited by fria319 - 3 years ago
Inese_20 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

I just have a question here. How does it matter now? Will somebody's remorse or guilt bring back a life that was brutally taken? Does it matter anyway?

Raghav is indirectly responsible for Abhishek's death. Abishek worked for Raghav. If Raghav was a law-abiding citizen, then he is not involved. But here Abishek got shot because he was doing Raghav's job. Raghav may not have any hand in his shooting but he definitely has a hand in Abhishek's death, but not wholly. He should be remorseful atleast.


Agreed Vera. He’s morally responsible, if not legally. And he should rightly be held accountable for that. Raghav himself would carry this guilt to his grave that a young life was lost because he didn’t want to give up on extra money. He is going to be very remorseful, I am sure. It just hasn’t kicked in yet. He has this huge wall around himself, he is trying to tell himself that it’s not on him. He will get there and the realisation is going to hit him like a storm. How much justice the writers can do to this, I am not sure. They are just so unreliable.


Wilddreams thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Inese_20


SaiShi shippers? Do you hear him?


It's time for Gayu ki special massage 🤣🤣🤣

joliefemme thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Inese_20


you know it’s too early to say whether Pallavi cannot/should not abandon him because it depends a lot on how would Raghav react when all this comes out. See Pallavi would already be very hurt because she was lied to, a promise was broken and moreover her husband’s business was the reason a person got killed in front of her eyes. After all this, If Ragahv goes in a defensive mode, is not guilty at all and instead blurts out things he said in the precap, then I can’t imagine how will Pallavi be able to stay? That’s super hurtful. If he tells her that she loves him for his money and still Pallavi somehow finds it in herself to stay back at his house - then it would be whole another level of determination towards the marriage. Which I for one won’t be able to understand. Will have to try hard. I mean my instant reaction would be to walk out. He literally questioned her whole existence in that one sentence? I mean Raghav has his issues for sure, but so does Pallavi! She is as much a human as he is.


lol Ren you just said you are a very practical person. Would you still stay, if you are in Pallavi’s shoes?

If Ragahv is being not so disrespectful, then I can see how she will be able to still try for him.


See Parul, I agree with you that it all depends on how he reacts but his reaction also depends on her reaction.


Knowing Pallavi, she's going to be accusing him for the death without trying to understand him (again she doesn't know the whole thing and will jump to conclusions and she's not wrong).


Once he hears her accusations, woh blame karne pe aayega. I still feel he will tell that she's enjoying the luxuries he's giving her rather than accusing her of being with him for the money. See, he's going to be angry and hence will spew venom. She needs to understand his intent rather than focus on his words. Also, Pallavi is all about self respect so I won't mind her leaving also if he hurts her self-respect.


Pallavi will stay back because in the promo she's in the house (will not share his room), and she told today that she doesn't believe in leaving but fighting it out.


A practical person like me won't take a second of his shit. The moment his lies are out, I'd run for the hills.

Wilddreams thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago

Originally posted by: Wallflowers

Why I am tagged here?🤔

Shore bhool bhool 🤔

Rahul naya ship bna raha hai 😆ShiRa

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".