Sushant Singh Rajput Case Thread #2 - ALL UPDATES/DISCUSSIONS HERE - Page 115

Originally posted by: xROBINx

here is article from your fav india today lol

https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/20101213-rich-lawyers-the-new-nawabs-745009-2010-12-04

Weird. Not the going rate at all. Not even for top Delhi supreme court lawyers. But it is mentioned in India Today. Guess Rakhi Sawant has that sort of money then.

Originally posted by: potterhead14

The fact that you are again and again bringing the blind item incident and comparing it to this is silly actually.

In the blind item case there was not a single solid proof everything was based on "rumours" from "sources" not a single person came forward and said I think Sushant is guilty..there were only baseless "sources"

Coming to rhea, yes there are baseless articles and we can ignore them but can the bank statements, family 's statement, statement from all his previous staff baseless as well and can be ignored ? All the people around him starting from his own family to his close friends came and talked against her!

If you want to defend her and provide logical arguments then that's totally fine indeed I think there should be a different perspective but the comparison you are again and again and again making in every single post of yours doesn't really make sense! The counter arguments you are giving is more like defending rhea rather than providing a different perspective

Ok I was right this afternoon

Number double go gye h after rheality got free from ED enquiry

https://www.instagram.com/p/CDmMoKCFrB-/?igshid=tm29lre90hkw

Originally posted by: xROBINx

she went because she had not choice after dismissing of two pleas back to back.

What the hell has Arnab to do with this. Yes he reported that she wont come and she tried but she came their to avoid arrest. How is Arnab wrong here??

Dont turn this case into Arnab bashing. You dont like him fine nobody care about it even arnab dont care. But every single channel doing the same. Even sickular channels like India today said the same thing why dont use them as example in place of Arnab??

Originally posted by: aaditi123

If you say the same thing over and over again, it becomes the Truth.

I tried correcting someone a few days ago that Satish Maneshinde is nowhere near the top lawyer in India. He just arranged for Salman Khans bail in the DUI case. It was actually Harsh Salve, who is actually one of the top lawyers in India and represents the Birla's and the Tata's who fought and won Salman's DUI case.

Maneshinde usually represents Cops, Bookies and even Rakhi Sawant. The 10 Lakh/Day fee is a massively inflated figure unless people think Cops & Rakhi Sawant can afford that.

Now its considered the TRUTH. Thats the power of the media and systematic brain washing. DONT even Bother.

Originally posted by: Pr1yanka

Oh you quoted me again and still don’t have the answer. The question is not whether Rhea should or should not go to prison. You said in your initial post “it is rheas right to ask ED”... well the plain answer is no, it is not her right to ask ED. She is a potential suspect. If an investigative agency wants her in for questioning, she has to go. This is not her la La land, where she can exercise her whims and fancies. I literally had to spell it out for you and you are welcome! It is not that difficult to understand you know, if you want to.

Originally posted by: Pr1yanka

Oh you quoted me again and still don’t have the answer. The question is not whether Rhea should or should not go to prison. You said in your initial post “it is rheas right to ask ED”... well the plain answer is no, it is not her right to ask ED. She is a potential suspect. If an investigative agency wants her in for questioning, she has to go. This is not her la La land, where she can exercise her whims and fancies. I literally had to spell it out for you and you are welcome! It is not that difficult to understand you know, if you want to.