Ranbir's detractors fail to see the bigger picture? - Page 3

So you tend to tell us that he was not a man child in Bachna Ae Haseeno, Besharam, Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, Ae Dil Hai Mushkil??

Originally posted by: ffkhan

So you tend to tell us that he was not a man child in Bachna Ae Haseeno, Besharam, Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani, Ae Dil Hai Mushkil??

man-child

noun

1. an immature man.
   
   
   
   
   • ARCHAIC
     a male child
     
     
     
   
   
   
   
   

No if you consider an ambitious man who knew exactly what he wants a from life and has worked hard for then yes bunny was a man child but then many of us are like that so are you a man/woman child too??

Raj was a casonova he treated girls like shit he was a jerk but certainly not a man child a man with well paying job who gets an opportunity of high paying job in Australia is a immature ? How how can that guy be immature is beyond so basically according to you someone who gets such a nice opportunity is man/woman child ??

Ayan was obessesive lover and you see there is stark difference in being obessesive and being immature

And bubbly was working singl- handedly applying hook and crook to make a living history how was he a man child ??? So by that logic each one of us including you is man/woman child

Bhed chal ka shikaar ho bhai tum sabke sab

Sure each of them were flawed but man child or immature seriously ????

Apart from being practical bunny was also a genuinely nice friend he was so good to Naina made her feel so comfortable throughout the trip but put raj in that situation and he wouldn't have given Naina second look or even he would have it would have been only for his selfish reason but Bunny did not had any ulterior motive. And bubbly someone like him would have never taken Naiba seriously . And ayan well ayan and Naina did had a lot of similarity keeping aside that obessesive lover part

I personally think Ranbir is one of the few actors who's got it all. Looks, acting and personality. Yeah hes shy and reserved types but I've seen couple of his interviews and he has a great sense of humour. He doesnt have to make fun of himself or appear like a class clown to be funny.

Number of hits or flops wont affect him because he will always be remembered for his acting first and thats the best gift an actor can receive.

Originally posted by: Silveraliax

I personally think Ranbir is one of the few actors who's got it all. Looks, acting and personality. Yeah hes shy and reserved types but I've seen couple of his interviews and he has a great sense of humour. He doesnt have to make fun of himself or appear like a class clown to be funny.

Number of hits or flops wont affect him because he will always be remembered for his acting first and thats the best gift an actor can receive.

Looks and personality? 😏 Eye of the beholder I guess.

BW hasn't had a decent looking hero since Hrithik. Shaheed at least has even features, but RK? No way. Even his personality by which I assume you mean aura, is mainly due to the last name. Otherwise, he comes across as an entitled, petulant user.

Agree that he is a thespian compared to his contemporaries, but his mediocrity becomes glaring when compared to actual actors like say, a Rajkumar Rao or a Nawaz or a Mohanlal or even a regional contemporary like Fahd Fazil.

As much as I dislike Ranbir, there's no denying he's a fine actor and I partially agree at the best product of nepotism part, I think he is one of the best, there a few more.

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Then i can confidently say you haven't watched his films at all

I watched all of his films (except for roy and besharam)

lets respect and acknowledge everyone's opinions

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Nobody absolutely nobody gets that amount of hate he gets his and his mother s relationship was literally termed as an illicit affair on this forum Now what worse can somebody actually say after this

DEEPIKA says hi (on this forum)

:)

Originally posted by: MahanalayakKarn

Looks and personality? 😏 Eye of the beholder I guess.

BW hasn't had a decent looking hero since Hrithik. Shaheed at least has even features, but RK? No way. Even his personality by which I assume you mean aura, is mainly due to the last name. Otherwise, he comes across as an entitled, petulant user.

Agree that he is a thespian compared to his contemporaries, but his mediocrity becomes glaring when compared to actual actors like say, a Rajkumar Rao or a Nawaz or a Mohanlal or even a regional contemporary like Fahd Fazil.

That s just your opinion and not a fact.

When u have an agenda u can term every film as per your convenient genre...😆 I can say all films are basically "man child", "finding yourself" film, u cant refute me...

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

That s just your opinion and not a fact.

At the end of the day, these are all opinions. That's why I said eye of the beholder.

The acting talent though... I don't know which part of India you're from, but do try a Fahd movie or two. Most people would say none of the mainstream BW can match up.

FYI. I don't care much for RK's contemporaries, either, except perhaps Ayushman, and he too is kinda mediocre, but I like his general attitude.