What does he mean to say?

I'm not getting the point at all

Is he implying star playing the part is taking the limelight away from the sensitivity of the subject?

https://www.filmcompanion.in/chhapaak-deepika-padukone-laxmi-agarwal-acid-attack-survivor-meghna-gulzar/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

On another note I am not liking the articles from fc about chhapaak, all of their core is Deepika has to shed her 'beauty' which is in such a bad taste...

Stupid take.

Film companion wale pagal hai. Uss din anupama article likhi thi ki it is very brave on dp's part to let go off her beauty to play such character. And abhi yeh bol raha hai she wants to show off that I have a beautiful face but yet I played a character driven role in a story based on acid attack victim. Couldn't these two anu and rangan have sat together and came up with one article than contracting themselves.

This article doesn't make sense, what I got from it is he's not able to take dp's craft seriously because he's seeing her in prosthetics in promos and she's all beautiful and well dressed in promotions. He's not able to separate deepika n malti the character she's playing.

This article is messed up a lot.... What does he expect to happen post the movie ? Of course Deepika will move on to the next and laxmi will get back to her life..... But there will be more awareness hopefully and we won't have more victims in future or at least less number of victims....

If he expect deepika to keep lamenting about Laxmi and other victims then that's not normal... She is not the culprit so her empathy will be there only till a certain level.... If he expects her to do something, open an ngo or something then why not do it himself. The onus is not only on her, anyone can do it... Infact SRK already is doing things for them....

Wonder why he can't see that even laxmi is dressing up for these promotions and they are standing side by side to show that there is no difference between them... To show that no matter how you look, you can still go ahead and live a normal life, dress up the way you want and not bother about what the society says...

Will filmcompanion learn to only review a movie without thinking about the offscreen persona of the actors. There are these two wannabes critics like rahul and suita of whatever he name is and then the senior Anupama. You would think rangan is the only sensible one but this article is in a bad taste. Yes all actors whatever their gender is who changes themselves completely to surrender the role goT an Oscar not only the actresses he mentioned.

honestly these people are actors what matters is what we see in the movie. Not everyone follows what they are doing offscreen. People see a trailer or got to hear about it and then they will watch it.
They exaggerateing the beauty part.

Originally posted by: Eboza

Will filmcompanion learn to only review a movie without thinking about the offscreen persona of the actors. There are these two wannabes critics like rahul and suita of whatever he name is and then the senior Anupama. You would think rangan is the only sensible one but this article is in a bad taste. Yes all actors whatever their gender is who changes themselves completely to surrender the role goT an Oscar not only the actresses he mentioned.

honestly these people are actors what matters is what we see in the movie. Not everyone follows what they are doing offscreen. People see a trailer or got to hear about it and then they will watch it.
They exaggerateing the beauty part.

Even Rangan does that. Everyone has his/her own likes and dislikes. Uss hisab se personal ho jaate hai... film ya acting ke review karne ke ilawa.