How is this not glorification of ema?

kiransgirl thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#1
The writers have been rightfully criticized for injecting God into this disgusting affair, sanctioning kundani lust as divine love. But we know there have been denials from said writers that they are not glorifying the sin of adultery. Yet their words ring hollow. I present the current track of the other woman, thirsty side chick, sacrificing their eternal, divine love so the cheater husband can settle for a loveless marriage with wife and child as an example. What exactly is the message here? The affair is exciting. He will always dream of it. The mistress is pure, 🤢a saint sacrificing her true love. They have only amplified the affair, presenting it as pure love. The marriage in contrast is seen as a noose around these lovers necks. The wife is the harpie who can only keep the man by burdening him with their child. I will be surprised if kunalji doesn't say to nandani
: woe but it was a baby with you I wanted not maulišŸ˜• Just tell me how this doesn't elevate this sick, immoral affair as pure and divine?
I would also like to know why the wife has to be painted as so clingy and resistant to her own future happiness by taking back such a man whom she knows does not love her. I would think all those supporters whining about the regressive nature of the storyline in regards to nandani would also now cry out just as vociferously about the regressive nature in which the wife is presented.
If any character has a chance to be shown as independent and strong, it's mauli. She is financially independent, has familial support, is beautiful and strong. If the writers really wanted to be original, bold and progressive, presenting this character as strong would have been the perfect opportunity. Mauli moving on with her life, getting counseling and finding and thriving in a new life WOULD have been truly bold.
But this shit, it's typical drivel..

Take heart though, supporters of righteousness, today's mistress is tomorrows wife, looking behind her bare exposed back at the New side chickšŸ‘
Edited by kiransgirl - 6 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

51

Views

5.4k

Users

18

Likes

172

Frequent Posters

Rinnks thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#2
Totally resonate with each n every word..

They had shown Mauli so strong, didn't think twice b4 filing divorce.. and suddenly now she is weak n meek.
The SACRIFICE is sickening! Instead unite them n show them suffering, atleast it will be a lesson to all the cheaters out there..
silver_lotus thumbnail
7th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#3
We can't expect some good characters on television is what I learn from this. This is not entertainment. Why continue this show when the story roams about the same circle. There is no hope, happiness goodness, no nothing in this story. Then why should we see. The whole future track shows no hope of looking forward except pain for good person.
Serendipity.. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
#4
The creatives of this show are extremely clueless.
On one side they show Kunal and Nandini in love and next min they show Nandini as the one uniting Mauli and Kunal. Didas dialogues of someone else praying for Mauli was cringe worthy. And this illogical pregnancy track out of no where. The makers are playing merry go round with the script by appeasing all fandoms! This show is so doomed!
Sabyata thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Serendipity..

The creatives of this show are extremely clueless.

On one side they show Kunal and Nandini in love and next min they show Nandini as the one uniting Mauli and Kunal. Didas dialogues of someone else praying for Mauli was cringe worthy. And this illogical pregnancy track out of no where. The makers are playing merry go round with the script by appeasing all fandoms! This show is so doomed!



It's not done yet
Any time we are gonna see--Nandini's pregnancy😈

aare woh Bed sharing ka raaj toh abhi tak khula nahi hai..Mauli per


Krinya thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 6 years ago
#6
The last thing i would like to see is a leap and kunal back to mauli and nandini independent businesswoman ..the child twist.is very sickening and cliche . Its obvious that women do all sorts of.compromises for her child , so will mauli . And what if nandu is also pregnant by some magic ? Thw growns up kids will be best friends ? Sick ! I will continue watching only if mauli divorces kunal . Otherwise bye bye
Edited by _charu_ - 6 years ago
Silpa20 thumbnail
IPL 2023 Match Winner Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 6 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Sabyata



It's not done yet
Any time we are gonna see--Nandini's pregnancy 😈

aare woh Bed sharing ka raaj toh abhi tak khula nahi hai..Mauli per


Nandini may also get pregnant then mauli will know the extent of kundini affair.I guess she still doesn't know that.
chirpyhapibird thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#8
@krystal
if you do a survey you will find 90 % of women dont wear what they would like to wear(india).Ask them the reason.You will know.Like i said its bookish.
441597 thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
#9
You're again contradicting yourself.
Tell me one thing firmly.

"Clothes is the reason for rape"-- You believe this line or not?

Where did you find the '90%' data? Even women in small towns have also started wearing short clothes now. And anyway majority of India's population is still traditional and old-fashioned. That has nothing to do with rape.


Chirpy: Mindsets such as 'clothes speak' is the reason so many people believe that it was the woman's short clothes which led her to get raped. That is direct victim-blaming.

Wearing short clothes makes me feel good, that's why I wear it. Not because I want random men to pounce on me, or cat-call me. Women teachers in girls' schools also wear backless blouses. Why? There are no men there. They wear it for fashion, not to show off for men.

It's a very, very wrong notion that women dress only for men.
Edited by krystal_watz - 6 years ago
chirpyhapibird thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 6 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: krystal_watz

You're again contradicting yourself.

Tell me one thing firmly.

"Clothes is the reason for rape"-- You believe this line or not?

Where did you find the '90%' data? Even women in small towns have also started wearing short clothes now. And anyway majority of India's population is still traditional and old-fashioned. That has nothing to do with rape.


Chirpy: Mindsets such as 'clothes speak' is the reason so many people believe that it was the woman's short clothes which led her to get raped. That is direct victim-blaming.

Wearing short clothes makes me feel good, that's why I wear it. Not because I want random men to pounce on me, or cat-call me. Women teachers in girls' schools also wear backless blouses. Why? teacher are no men there. They wear it for fashion, not to show off for men.

It's a very, very wrong notion that women dress only for men.

see ...you yourself said teachers wear backless blouses in girl's school.Then why not in a boys school or co aid school ????
Can you tell me why not in boys school.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".