Public voting vs Judges for Agnipariksha?

Will public voting give us the most deserving winner or will it be a BIASED result, leaning towards the most popular contestant rather than the best singing talent?

I don't believe in public voting and i feel panel of judges is better, but daler mehndi,alka yagnik kind 😡 I have my own doubts.

PUBLIC VOTING IS NOT FRUITFULL FOR AGNIPRIKSHA.

Well i have mixed thoughts.
The Judges can normally pick the better singer by listening to Sur and Raag nd all that other really important things. BUT at this stage those singers have most of those things down for the most part, and public voting lets ppl get involved, it lets us pick who we think is the better, who we will want to listen to.

panel of judges is better..c'oz sometimes it becomes really dificult to pick a singer and sometimes there cud be partialtity too with smses and all

It has to be judges! Otherwise opinions will be biased and people will look for things outside pure singing!

Panel of Judges.... public gose by looks most of the time! but there should b atleast 5 jugde in the panel... then it will give the rite result....

2 jiudge in a panel.... i dont think thats good enough!!!

1 more thing that lacks in Sa re ga ma pa.. that judges r not repeated very often... as a result versatility doesnt come into count!!! i think they should a make wide range of judges to get the rite person!

Originally posted by: thhikana

Panel of Judges.... public gose by looks most of the time! but there should b atleast 5 jugde in the panel... then it will give the rite result....

2 jiudge in a panel.... i dont think thats good enough!!!

1 more thing that lacks in Sa re ga ma pa.. that judges r not repeated very often... as a result versatility doesnt come into count!!! i think they should a make wide range of judges to get the rite person!

As it is 4 mentors are fighting to kill each other, a 5 judge panel will only add more violence😭

Originally posted by: kangaroo

As it is 4 mentors are fighting to kill each other, a 5 judge panel will only add more violence😭

Comparison between mentors and judges is not correct here.

Mentors are fighting because of their large egos and because they have their own candidates competing in the show.

Why would 3 or more judges fight??? or why would they add more violence???

Give the judges the task to give marks according to their judgment, collate them and announce the results. That's about it. This would be much fair than public voting, which could become biased.

Originally posted by: taikoo

Comparison between mentors and judges is not correct here.

Mentors are fighting because of their large egos and because they have their own candidates competing in the show.

Why would 3 or more judges fight??? or why would they add more violence???

Give the judges the task to give marks according to their judgment, collate them and announce the results. That's about it. This would be much fair than public voting, which could become biased.

Watch Alka Yagnik and Jagjit Singh differ in their opinions and fight. It might not have been as combative and interesting as the ones between the mentors, but surely the friction was evident.

It is not the "ego", insecurity or immaturity of the mentors, it is more the love and the belief in their disciples that makes them go to the war, the Guru will always have a soft corner for the contestant from his gharana.

Parents can be critical, and objective, but Gurus are supportive and encouraging....this element of emotion is always discounted in most observations made.