Page
of
1The story of 100 brothers is believed to be an exaggeration of Buddhist monks who wanted to show that how Chand Ashoka was before following Buddhism. Its not much credible. Lets see how the story unfolds. Ashoka's birth is inevitable. Probably they can show Ashoka's birth with introduction of a small leap (which is quite common in Indian shows)simultaneously showing Sushim.Agreed! They can't show ashoka being born when he had so many brothers who were actually older than him. I read that the he only became the samrat by killing all his brothers except his brother vitashoka, who was his biological brother. He apparently had 100 brothers in total. So they would have to show sushim being born to charu first. I'd rather they didn't end it with chandra nandini being separated and bindu having a child. It should end with chandra and nandini both departing from the kingdom and bindu ascending the throne, whilst making dharma his chief queen. I'll be pissed if helena won't be exposed and punished. But history wise she never was evil at all.
comment:
p_commentcount