super scene of to day

One more assassin...fine very fine. .definitely he will be defeated..say how?

There are no wireless tele communications in that period..otherwise Achraya would have sent the msg to CGM

As expected Moora has put her cards in the table..Nandini should not attend the Bindu's ceremony How cruel these people?

We feel the pain;no body lends a helping hand to her; it evokes sympathetic sadness in us ;Chandra seems to be least (un)affected.

"Super" scene of the episode..Chandra wearing Nandini's payal to Visaka.

Emotions play effortlessly. Rajat has skilfully succeeded in rendering his various emotions like mischief, sarcasm, satire, ridicule and scorn on the screen canvas in a very profound manner.

CVs didn't waste any time to bring Vis and C to gether

Nandini has started doubting her; warns him to keep Bindu away from Vis

Chandra's acid remarks hurt (Nandini)us. But we can feel some undercurrent play going on

Let us bring back our memories

He saved Nandini in 1. Gowthami vs Durdra case 2. Moora's gift case 3. Roopa conspiracy 4. Why not now?

The plot thickens to get Vis and C marry;

Nandini saves CGM from the assassin;albeit she will be thrown out;will she be?

Though we miss their romantic scenes, Vis and C's closeness stir up our inquisitiveness ...not bad..

Originally posted by: soapwatcher1

Yes, it hurt to watch Chandra treat Nandini so indifferently - gifting her books and payal to VK was a low blow, and the lowest was telling VK Nandini was no longer a Maharani.
Cruel blows all, where has the supposed love gone? Where there is love, there should be trust. But here there is only distrust so there cannot be love.
I hope Chandra learns his lesson well when he discovers for himself that VK is a threat to him and to his beloved son. I hope Chandra eats crow when he realizes how wrong he has been all along about Nandini.
As for Mora, as someone else wrote on another thread, she has been reduced to a caricature of a soap mother in law. No expectations from that quarter at all.

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

Hi Siva , missed today's episode.

However, I would like to add a few more plots to your list, where Chandu saved Nandu :

Haldi ceremony

Nandini's prepared escape route for Dhanand from Palace, which Chandu was aware of.

Balgram Brahmin who tried to molest Nandu.

Balgram lady accusing Jayant Singh aka Nandu as her husband.

When Chakku refused yo give Nandu Education Certificate, bcoz she is a woman.

Patalgram swamp.

Patalgram poojari who tried to sacrifice Nandu for evil powers.

Chaya being pushed and her abortion case.

His own poison drinkin case.

Durdhara being poisoned on her Godbharai day through the Kheer.

From Kaling King's BIL, when he tried to molest Chandrika aka Nandu.

From Kaling Queen, when she blamed Nandu for seducing King Chandu.

Kaling court where Nandu was accused of murdering the King's BIL.

PS : I wouldn't credit Chandu for saving Nandu from the Gufa scene, since it was the calf who searched Nandu, kicked all bandits , and brought Chandu (along with his shawl) to Nandu 😆

Originally posted by: siva06

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

No Siva, what Jodhu and Soapwatcher are trying to bring to table here, is different.

I agree with you that Chandu is doing all this to Nandu, just to irritate and make her jealous.

BUT ...

There's something called Civil Behavior. A husband and wife will fight inside a bedroom, or inside the Hall of a house. But they wont throw stones at each other in public. But that's for common people.

And here, we are talking about Regal / Royal behavior. A King and Queen life in Private, as well as Public - is much much different. And both Mother and Son were mudslinging Nandu in public. And Nandu is no commoner. She was a Princess; a Queen; now, although she has brought in as a Daasi, she is still a Banished Queen for the Public.

Holding the hands of an unwed princess, kidnapped from an ousted kingdom, who is staying with you as a Guest... A King wouldn't hold the hands of a Guest - a woman - a Princess of another kingdom in PUBLIC VIEW... That's not Regal behavior. That too, an unmarried one ...

That would have a lot of speculation and impact on Chandra's behavior - much after he cleared his name miraculously in Malti's case. He was spoiling his own image amongst his Praja, for the sake of just making his wife jealous ?? That's not Royal Behavior at all.

Chalo, maan lete hai ki Chandu was raised as an orphan, and is still learning his steps on being a King and putting on Kingly behavior. But, Moora ...

Moora lived like a Queen and now she is a Rajmata. Rajmata should set an example of royal behavior for all her womenfolk in the Palace. And she expresses her displeasure in having Nandini - in front of Vishakha, a princess another kingdom, who is a Guest at the Palace - is a sure Downslide on her character. Its a function that would be attended by all the Praja of Magadh. If common public can be tolerated by the Mother Queen inside her Palace, can she not stand one more person who is keeping her grandson safe ??? If Queen Mother us like that, can't expect much from a King, can we ???

While weaving a story focussing on poor heroine, and how she is being ill treated by her husband and in-laws, it is also important for the CVs to Remember subtle differences from a common hus-wife relationship to a King-Queen relationship. They have forgotten the basic decencies of Royal Life.

Originally posted by: rajatshweta

No Siva, what Jodhu and Soapwatcher are trying to bring to table here, is different.

I agree with you that Chandu is doing all this to Nandu, just to irritate and make her jealous.

BUT ...

There's something called Civil Behavior. A husband and wife will fight inside a bedroom, or inside the Hall of a house. But they wont throw stones at each other in public. But that's for common people.

And here, we are talking about Regal / Royal behavior. A King and Queen life in Private, as well as Public - is much much different. And both Mother and Son were mudslinging Nandu in public. And Nandu is no commoner. She was a Princess; a Queen; now, although she has brought in as a Daasi, she is still a Banished Queen for the Public.

Holding the hands of an unwed princess, kidnapped from an ousted kingdom, who is staying with you as a Guest... A King wouldn't hold the hands of a Guest - a woman - a Princess of another kingdom in PUBLIC VIEW... That's not Regal behavior. That too, an unmarried one ...

That would have a lot of speculation and impact on Chandra's behavior - much after he cleared his name miraculously in Malti's case. He was spoiling his own image amongst his Praja, for the sake of just making his wife jealous ?? That's not Royal Behavior at all.

Chalo, maan lete hai ki Chandu was raised as an orphan, and is still learning his steps on being a King and putting on Kingly behavior. But, Moora ...

Moora lived like a Queen and now she is a Rajmata. Rajmata should set an example of royal behavior for all her womenfolk in the Palace. And she expresses her displeasure in having Nandini - in front of Vishakha, a princess another kingdom, who is a Guest at the Palace - is a sure Downslide on her character. Its a function that would be attended by all the Praja of Magadh. If common public can be tolerated by the Mother Queen inside her Palace, can she not stand one more person who is keeping her grandson safe ??? If Queen Mother us like that, can't expect much from a King, can we ???

While weaving a story focussing on poor heroine, and how she is being ill treated by her husband and in-laws, it is also important for the CVs to Remember subtle differences from a common hus-wife relationship to a King-Queen relationship. They have forgotten the basic decencies of Royal Life.

Originally posted by: siva06

All actions are just provocation on the part of Chandra..to make her say "i love you..have come here for your sake also"

She better dont utter him that at this point of time, Siva. He is becoming so undeserving to know it with each passing moment. And moreover, that will further feed to his already Magadh-sized ego and insensitivity. A MAN afterall... and that too an EMPEROR at that...

Soapwatcher seems right. All his so-called love dried in the stormy winds of Durdhara's death . I could feel no love at all for Nandini. Just my opinion...

But the worst part to digest is that Nandini can't punish Moora for her deeds unlike in the case of Chandra, where she can atleast show him some royal ignorance or give a taste of his own medicine, once she is proved innocent.