Posted:
In a film, if a hero(being a pauper) set off to be rich(after a song) we mock at the directors,producers and so on.
But(approximately) 2300 years back a forlorn ,and pitifully abandoned child(orphaned), getting constant rebuke from his foster father became an emperor and Mahan of our Bharath.
It is an irrefutable and undeniable truth existing before us.Chandra, the pitiable child came out of his clouts and conquered almost the entire Bharath.
here in our Chandra-nandini, the process of evolution is taking place and Rajat Tokas playing Chandra is doing an excellent job of portraying the part.
In a Greek's soldier uniform(why the Greeks are speaking English then and there),bowing his head and serving the liquor ,though unbearable..his acting .is outstanding.
He stands there as a mere onlooker, observing all the activities(love affair between Malayaketu and Helena)..he does not emote any reaction..again Rajat stands out!!
By the historical facts, the period of existence of Helena is dubious ,hence the CN team took it for their benefit and introduced Helena
Now they reveal that(thru Parvatak) Helena is not the daughter of Chikkandar ,but his sevak Celucus' Puthri
So Helena marries CGM after getting rejected by Malayaketu?(REVENGE)
But at this juncture Chandra is a mere synic ,how will the marriage take place?
So side by side we have both Nandini and Helena..the plot thickens.
In the back ground Acharya and Chandra started collaborating against the enemy
The CN team gives the scenes harmoniously and appropriately in a combined streamlined
manner
Though not we have hair rising scenes , the episode is commendable
