A small doubt !

Page

gurti227

@gurti227

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Hello all ..I'm Jyothsna ! I have a tiny doubt and didnt know whom to ask ! 😆
In episode 269 of SKR,they have shown Rama requesting any of his brothers to accept the throne so that he can take Sita with him and leave Ayodhya.But none of them agree.
Today i was watching LavaKusa(a telugu movie) where Rama requests his brothers about accepting the throne.But they dont agree.!
I just want to ask why did they do so?If any one would have accepted,Rama would not have abandoned Sita ! The brothers didn't want Rama to abandon sita and Rama's plead was definitely an option..Then why ?🤔

PS:This is just a thought and not to offend any of the brothers.Just wanted to find some views on the topic !

Quote

Frequent Posters

Justitia

@Justitia

Rocker

Posted: 9 years ago

Remember the time when Kaikeyi demanded throne for Bharat while Ram was still available?

Main takeaway from Uttar Kand - You should be bold enough to take tough decisons in life rather than running away from situations.

Edited by lexy_rix - 9 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

gurti227

@gurti227

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: lexy_rix
Remember the time when Kaikeyi demanded throne for Bharat while Ram was still available?

Main takeaway from Uttar Kand - You should be bold enough to take tough decisons in life rather than running away from situations.

Right! Ramayana teaches us many many values and morals! 😊
But dont you think the situation here is different ? There it was 14 years of vanvaas and returning back to ayodhya.but here it is sita's parityag and never returning back to ram 😭

Quote

raima18

@raima18

Beginner

Posted: 9 years ago

I think first of all it was their respect for their brother Shri Ram and his rightful place on the throne. Second Ram was the beloved king of the praja. Next during the rajyabhishek Ram makes a promise to his people and the land an his ancestor to do his duty. And Suryavanshi's had this thing about Pran Jane per vachan na jaaye. So if they had agreed they would be all helping him break that rule. And ayodhya was famous for this rule. At least that is what I think may be the reason.

Quote

gurti227

@gurti227

Explorer

Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: raima18
I think first of all it was their respect for their brother Shri Ram and his rightful place on the throne. Second Ram was the beloved king of the praja. Next during the rajyabhishek Ram makes a promise to his people and the land an his ancestor to do his duty. And Suryavanshi's had this thing about Pran Jane per vachan na jaaye. So if they had agreed they would be all helping him break that rule. And ayodhya was famous for this rule. At least that is what I think may be the reason.

Hey ! TFS !
Yes this maybe a reason !

Quote

A small doubt !

Related Topics

Explore Topics