Originally posted by: NathuPyare
I think there are certain issues, close to people's hearts, where people tend to overreact.
For example - The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was due yo a rumor of usage of cow and pig fat in cartridges... the people who spread that rumor knew it very well that people will overreact because this issue is close to their hearts...similarly, the Kanhaiya controversy... people overreact because most people DO love their nation.and Tanmay must also be aware of the impact his video could have on the audience..still he went ahead with it.The problem is some mischief mongers, like Tanmay and Kanhaiya, take unfair advantage of freedom of expression by exploiting people's emotion for their own rotten publicity!My point is can we simply allow some people to abuse FOE for their own cheap publicity OR there has to be a limit where FOE should cease to exist?Can we allow speeches in favor of rapes, pedophilia, religious intolerance in the favor of FOE?Can you get away with a 'funny' video about wishing bomb threat in America in the name of FOE?If not then why can't we set some boundaries where FOE is not misused by some mischievous elements for their own selfish benefits?
9