Interesting turn - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

35

Views

3.5k

Users

13

Likes

102

Frequent Posters

SPuja thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#31
When a good character changes suddenly and start doing everything bad - it is indeed butchering of character - and when this character start doing everything that will hurt only her own cause and strengthen the claim of the lead - then it is indeed butchering to make the lead look good. It happened with Gauri and it is happening in case of Mangala. With Gauri - people accepted because Anandi was not in a position to counter her - she was left under educated by DS - it was not her fault - she was not empowered. And we did not see the good side of Gauri much (not clear though because I missed initial J- Gauri phase as well as Anandi-J relationship after leap - found it like regular show just after the leap - with teenage love story type). But I think Gauri was not shown like helping others and saving someone etc. So, that track was accepted by viewers.
But this negative Mangala who lost her marbles just in one night is not good to watch - Anandi is more empowered than Mangala, she has support of powerful people, she has wealth and still she is not doing right things. I think most of the viewers are not finding this track enjoyable. I have stopped watching as of now.
fast trak thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#32
Well it's convenient to say that the character of Mangala is butchered and hence there are people hating her because the character of Anandi isn't butchered at all, on the contrary she's an angel but still there are people averse to her.
fast trak thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#33
But yes every show needs an evil personality so right now Akhiraj is in jail and Mangala has taken his place.
And whatever good she may have done so far is all wiped off because she has neutralised all of it with the evil that she's doing now. And there's nothing that will reverse it now
731627 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#34
first time see vinay pandey as director of balika vadhu .currently vinay pandey doing good direction of bv
fly2meee thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#35
Mangala may be good at sometime but what she is doing now is not at all acceptable. Just because a person is good for a part of their life doesn't make it okay if they do such evil things later. No one is born negative, its their choice to turn negative, and Mangala chose that road. Now she is negative. Her negative side outweighed her positive character.
Edited by fly2meee - 10 years ago
GoodDoc_2105 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#36
She may have different set of values as compared to Akheraj and Harki.
But her attachment for Nandini is not natural.It came out of her own need for motherhood and wanting a child.She wanted that child because she felt her life is meaning less .

She endorsed that story that Akheraj told because it suited her purpose but at that time she could afford to be magnonimous and say that her mother must have had some majhboori in doing so when she knew all along the child was never dumped.Because it made her look more compassionate and also this helped in moving the child closer to her.The child would feel even if she is not wanted by her mother there is at least someone who cares for her.

Her bonding was based on this lie.

She told Jagya the story without thinking of consequences like she always does.As for exposing Akheraj it is the only good thing she has done so far and that too because Nimboli's life was in danger.

--------------

Mahabharat war happened because of putr moh.People can go to any lengths in their attachment for their children.It may be mythology or it may be real but it still resonates because people connect with the emotions that drove the characters in that epic.There the father was not blinded because he did not of eye sight but was blinded by emotions he wanted his son to have what he was deprived of.
Here the lady wants the child of another woman because she has been deprived of.

Even now the child is more consumed by hatred for her mother rather than soothed by this mother figure.At least that should tell Mangala that the child is longing for her mother and she shouldn't hold her back.


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".