Interesting turn

Page

Next Last

leavesandwaves

@leavesandwaves

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 10 years ago

Yesterday Kundan's target was Pushkar and today its Urmi. How long can kamli protect them?

Nimboli burst out. Dadisa stunned. Perhaps nobody had shown that type of anger against dadisa.

Mangala so far played her game well. In one stroke, she achieved many objects. While dadisa and anandi are still arguing about when to disclose the truth.

When Kanta was being too rude, I saw some tears in Mangala's eyes. She still loves Nimboli and I hope she will realise what will happen if Nimboli herself is not there anymore.

Quote

Frequent Posters

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

What use of those tears? 🤢

What kind of love is this?

She doesn't want the child to get closer to anyone and love anyone else - that is sickening.

Urmi and Kamili she had no problem with them because they don't really have any claims on that child's affection.

This is all obvious from beginnig

It is now very clear why Mangala endorsed Akheraj and Harki's garbage bin theory.

She wanted the child to have nothing to do with her mother.

If the child believed that about her mother and together with Akheraj and Harki's illtreatment the child moved closer to her.

Akheraj and Harki out of picture the child after seeing Anandi with her son Nandini wanted a mother like CC.

Why can't she see for herself that the child herself never saw mother's love in her or saw her mother in her and let go of that child?

I knew Anandi would give excuses for Mangala's possessiveness and behaviour with that child just like she excused Sanchi's behaviour during SaJa phase saying that Sanchi loves Jagya. Why doesn't it occur to Anandi that love doesn't make a person behave like this?

------------------

Kundan targetting Urmi is expected. Don't know how Kamili is going to handle this.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

seraal

@seraal

Navigator

Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves
Yesterday Kundan's target was Pushkar and today its Urmi. How long can kamli protect them?

Nimboli burst out. Dadisa stunned. Perhaps nobody had shown that type of anger against dadisa.

Mangala so far played her game well. In one stroke, she achieved many objects. While dadisa and anandi are still arguing about when to disclose the truth.

When Kanta was being too rude, I saw some tears in Mangala's eyes. She still loves Nimboli and I hope she will realise what will happen if Nimboli herself is not there anymore.

TEARS MAY BE OUT OF LOVE BUT SHE INWARDLY FELT HER MISTAKE BUT STILL CONSOLED HERSELF TO BE RIGHT,JUST AND MISERABLE IN FRONT OF NIMBOLI...

THE POOR CHILD BELEIVES MANGLA ALOT

Edited by seraal - 10 years ago

Quote

fast trak

@fast trak

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

what's the problem in introducing Anandi as the real mother? Why is Mangala wanting to hide the fact? Does Mangala think Nimboli will never find out the truth?

Already created problems for Urmi and Kamli. I feel sorry for pushkar. What a devil of a mother is Harki. I don't blame Kundan. His parents are responsible for the way he is.

The day Kamli comes to know how Mangala pardoned Kundan she will have to face the music. No amount of Devi maa acting can save her now.

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

Mangala always knew that Nandini was never dumped but was snatched by Akheraj.

But she went with the story only because it suited her.

If the child knew how much her mother hated her she would never ever think of going to her mother.

So she introduced this mother and made her tell that she was dumped in garbage bin.

Whn in Akheraj house there was no hope of her mother turning up she said her mother must have some majhboori that's why she dumped her.

Now with the mother turning up that too a woman like Anandi she knew the child would go to her willingly.

People keep saying that Mangala turned negative to make Anandi Nandini union acceptable.

But here Mangala is painting the mother black so that she can shine in front of the child's mother.

Is this how mothers are?

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

If Mangala wanted to keep the child she wouldn't have told the full story and truth about Nimboli to Jagya.

She could have easily told a story suiting her, listening to which J would have not only appreciated her but also would have never thought of finding N's real parents.

Mangala could have easily said that they found this girl in a garbage bin and circumstances forced them to marry her to Kundan. But due to Akhi's increasing atrocities, it was necessary to fight and give these girls a life of freedom. Hence Nimboli will now live as Mangala's daughter.

Had Mangala said the above (or on similar lines), Jagya would have greatly appreciated her and also wouldn't bother searching for N's real parents.

It was quite clear that M was set to do all right things and that's why she told the real truth to J, clearly knowing that this might mean separation from Nimboli. But yes in doing so M completely outshone Anandi and hence she was turned negative. Otherwise she was far preferred over Anandi.

Ever since she has turned negative, there is no point finding logic in her actions because She won't do anything right now. If she did, she will be preferred over Anandi. Hence she will show evilness of all forms till people come to hate her and get desperate for Anandi Nandini reunion.

Edited by Missesha - 10 years ago

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

She told the story to Jagya to highlight Akheraj's atrocities and not because she thought he would help her find the child's mother.

Once the story came out there is nothing she could do because Jagya already guessed that N is Anandi's daughter and he wanted some proofs to show Anandi.When J saw the locket there was no way she could stop the child going to her mother.

She lied to the child about the clothes because they did not go with the garbage dump story.This was long before Akheraj was exposed.

She stuck to the garbage dump story from the begininng when it came to that child. She told the truth to Chagini and Jagya but why didn't she tell the child?Because it suited her purposes.

The child believes the garbage dump story because Mangala also went along with it.If it had been only Harki and Akheraj who said that she was found in garbage dump she wouldn't have believed that story because that child knew what kind of people Harki and Akheraj are.

The lady shined brightly only because of Akheraj and Harki and she wasn't cruel and callous like them but now she outshined Harki and Akheraj when it came to cruelty and callousness.

What's more it is to create sympathy for the child and not for Anandi.

The child is always seen as Anandi's estranged daughter regardless of the fact whether she was called Nimboli or Nandini.

It is quite clear now they want to establish the child's character on it's own independent of Anandi so they created this OTT drama to make the child upset enough to run away.

Anandi's child won't run away from home but Mangala's child can run away.

Anandi's child was snatched from her and the child whom Mangala calls her beti has run away.😛

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

To highlight Akhiraj's atrocities all M had to do was tell J that, both N and Urmi had bal vivah with K, plus how Akhi killed her hubby.

She had already done that based on which J got Akhi arrested. Then when J asked what about N's parents, M could have easily twisted the story and told him she was an orphan found in garbage bin - got married to K due to circumstances and now she is my daughter . J wouldn't have questioned further.

Simple 😛

M could have had the girl and Anandi wouldn't even know it because she was busy with Anant😛

But M was righteous so she did the right things... due to this A was outshined and M was turned negative overnight.

And this statement is so funny that Anandi's daughter wouldn't run away but Mangala's did. Seriously? Is there even any rationale behind it or just something put up as a argument just for the sake of belittling Mangala.

Edited by Missesha - 10 years ago

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

Anandi's daughter would not have life full of troubles if she lived with Anandi and lived as Anandi's daughter. It is as simple as that.

To build their future lead and amplify her troubles this fresh drama has started.

The child wants her mother and not willing to settle down and accept Mangala as her mother which wants so much.

Anandi knows the child hates her mother and Anandi is only looking for opportunities to make a connect with her child as her mother. Anandi is not after Mangala's place it is Mangala who wants to take on the child's mother's place in child's life.

So Mangala is never a rival of Anandi.Anandi knows her place.

-----------------------

Mangala told Jagya about the kidnap story because Jagya wanted to know why the parents were not contacted. If she stuck to the story of garbage bin with Jagya that would have put Akheraj in a better light since he picked up the child from garbage dump and made a family member even if it was through child marriage.😛

It was only told to show how nasty Akheraj is.

Akheraj told garbage dump story to escape kidnap charges and evade unwanted questions.But she wanted to nail Akheraj on one more count and that's why she told.

She didn't think of consequences. Just like she didn't think of consequences of child marriage of Nandni, letting Kundan get away even after that attack on her life and so many other times.

Quote

Missesha

@Missesha

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#10

Akhiraj's list of crimes were enough to put him behind the bars anyways. His idea of adopting a child and then making her a child bride would not have given him any brownie points. So there was no need for Mangala to reveal Nandini's full story. She could have still continued with Garbage bin story to Jagya, kept Nimboli to herself and even got Akhiraj punished.

Jagya would have still applauded her for her bravery, and looking at her kindness and genuineness, he would have helped in her nullifying Nimboli's bal vivah and also supported her in legally adopting nandini (because he wouldn't have known the other side of the story) 😛. And Akhiraj wouldn't have cleared the story either, as he wouldn't want to willingly add one more crime to his list😛

Looking at the way the how Mangala schemes now, only if she had done it earlier , she would have had Nimboli all to herself without fighting for a place. And anyways, Anandi wasn't searching for her daughter, so Mangala could have had shot 3 birds at a time. Jail Akhi and gang, have Nimboli for herself and also have the finances back.

But anyways, mangala was righteous so she did what was right. What she is now doing is extremely wrong, and this is only to make Nimbolis life easy. Nimboli now has two options of mothers. One completely black mother (Mangala), and another grey turned white mother Anandi.

Choice is easier. Simple.

Put grey shades next to black and grey appears lighter (whiter) than it was.

--------

Makers wanted Anandi's daughter to suffer, so they made Anandi lose her daughter, so then why can't the same makers give Anandi some brain and some strength to reveal the truth to her daughter and face the associated consequences?

Nimboli ran away because both mothers who claim to love her are acting in their own interests and not for the welfare of her daughter. Both are hopeless.

Mangala's downfall is not uplifting Anandi anyway. She still remains to be a failed mother, just that she is not evil (which Mangala now is)

Edited by Missesha - 10 years ago