History of JaiMal and Patta : HEROes of the 3rd Siege of Chittor - Page 13

Originally posted by: history_geek

<font face="Georgia, Times New Roman, Times, serif">Kaana,
I remember the case of Chanakya.
Though, his times and his case was different.
Leaving this point for a later time.

BTW,
Now India is united, but do you find the unity is really there ? After every 30-40 kms, the way of speaking changes. People still are divided on basis of caste, religion, language, etc.. despite so much "modernity" being introduced in our lives...What is your opinion on this ?

BTW, Did not get the comparison of Rajputs with Ambi of Taxila.
Could you explain ?
</font>

Abhay
India is all about unity in diversity. Yes there maybe disputes even over sharing water between states. Or disputes based in caste etc. But if a neighbour attacks, the whole country would stand together in unison.
Why attack even if someone comments on us, east west north south will give back in a single voice. Indianess tubs in our blood very much.

Ambi is not known to be a desh bhakt, even for his own piece of land. His desire for lady love and neighbouring land was more these values. Rajputs in general ate known for their desh prem, values. That was what I was trying to point out.

Originally posted by: Kaana

Abhay
India is all about unity in diversity. Yes there maybe disputes even over sharing water between states. Or disputes based in caste etc. But if a neighbour attacks, the whole country would stand together in unison.
Why attack even if someone comments on us, east west north south will give back in a single voice. Indianess tubs in our blood very much.

Ambi is not known to be a desh bhakt, even for his own piece of land. His desire for lady love and neighbouring land was more these values. Rajputs in general ate known for their desh prem, values. That was what I was trying to point out.

Kaana,
Will take some time to respond to this.
I have some important points in my mind right now.
Will post as and when i re-collect them.