I think this track was mainly brought out to show that education and social status don't actually define people but it is the people who define themselves by they way they use the status and education and power.
Anandi - had she been just one of the many people who works for an NGO or just a social worker would she have been able to deliver the child from torture? Yes she still would have gone ahead and saved the child and would have given the lady a piece of her mind.She would have solved Jyothi's problem without her husband's help too.
Having a husband who is an IAS officer made access to the collector's office a little easy and the problem got solved much more easily.She could do with one phone call. Anandi using her position as collector's patni herešš
Mandira is also trying to use her husband's connections to wriggle out of the trouble and she thought her status as collector's patni gave her immunity from law and could get away with it.š¤¢š”
I'm sure this lady gave a big fat dowry to get an IAS husbandš
Shiv would never tolerate his wife's use of her status as his patni to get what she wants he didn't even like the fact that Anandi disturbed him in a meeting with her phone call only when she stressed on the urgency of the issue that he listened to her.
Shiv used his powers as a collector to help his wife do service to the society while Puneet is using his powers to get himself and his wife out of the trouble thye landed in after their unlawful activities.
-----------------------------
One more thing in this track there are absolutely no bhashans from the Mahan couple.Only swift action.Shiv just told that guy that their friendship can't make him over look this brazen disregard for law of the land other than that absolutely nothing from Anandi only controlled aggression from her and she was silent through out.š
Edited by aparnauma - 10 years ago
Anupamaa
Cricket
