no limit to lack of logic - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

34

Views

4.2k

Users

12

Likes

52

Frequent Posters

642126 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#31
Look murderers, dacoits, bombers, those who maim others are no less either.
I am curious about appeal of villains. Maybe people like them as they keep tension and unpredictability in story. They like to be excited and engaged. This is why villain gets finished only in end. And his or her end also exudes most response.

Goenkas will get finished too. Relax.😊

I only hope Durga and co have solid plans to finish the trio. And it is not just locket, dhaaga, Mata ka chamatkar that saves them. Otherwise it will not uphold their appeal as heroes. They should earn their win, not just get made to win. That's my only wish for the end.

Though I am very disappointed with huge loopholes in handling of all characters be it positive or negative. 😕
natville25 thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#32
i just wish sanjukta or any other doctor will take upon themselves suddenly to check shaurya's development and test him . i want them to drop something heavy on his leg , pull his wheel chair away , use the knife to slice him .
I know i am being a sadist but i am feeling so joyous when i imagine such things happening to shaurya 😆
FeistyQueen thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#33
I don't know about logic.. coz logic in this show was gone long back! đŸ€Ș
but of shaurya not trusting his mom! wat can one expect from an animal like shaurya? he loves no one himself and his ego! đŸ€Ź
adoremevirgo thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: atominis


Goenkas were grey to begin with. Not black. They were made so later.


will u pls explain this more clearly...as far as i know grey means a character has a few positive shades and their negativity is due to some emotional or psychological reasons...
and black means totally a villain with no amount of remorse or mercy towards others...

from the beginning it has been shown that shaurya along with his friends has mercilessly raped a poor girl that too only because of a stupid bet...and the 2 years since he has never ever repented nor has he changed his colors...he wanted to rape durga too and so pretended to love her...

and sakshi...she is a woman but has manipulated payal to believe that shaurya will marry her and made her lie in the court...she bought all the witnesses (and also attempted to kill bagchis) only to save her son...u can call that mother's love...but after watching movies like mother india, vaastav i refuse to support a mother who saves the skin of a son who treats women as objects of betting games...she is also cruel enuf to send gundas to scare the already broken spirited payal...also sakshi is a killer too...she killed her first husband and his son (akash is alive that is another issue)...

and rajnath...he has also killed in the past and he also did everything to save shaurya...he has a dirty relation with his own son where the latter uses his secret affair as means to blackmail him...

and u call these characters grey...when were they ever grey...from the first episode they hv been out and out black...but thatz my POV...pls explain ur POV...

Edited by adoremevirgo - 10 years ago
adoremevirgo thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: atominis

It seems we are watching different shows.

Sakshi regretted many times. She had slapped Shaurya and called him a rapist after Dayal exposed his fake degree and taunted them. Rajnath had also initially been shown regretful. They were grey to begin with. But were made black recently.

Sakshi blasted Rajnath for fixing that alliance. I hope you watched those episodes. She did say she would never allow using kids. She shut up only when Rajnath assured marriage would not happen and this would be only an engagement. She had pretended to support him in front of Dev but fought with him alone in office.

She has always blasted Shaurya's friends for entering their house, misleading Shaurya. Blasted Shaurya for keeping bad company and risking it all over bets.

You cannot say they never regretted or showed concern for kids.

Raj and Sakshi were worried about Kangana's studies and lifestyle too. Raj wanted to help her start a business. Sakshi wanted to get her married to a good family.

All episodes are there to watch.

Only Shaurya was the one who had no regrets and thought parents just blabbered.

Sakshi had indeed tried Raima like best friend and fought with Jatin for her. When Jatin tried to mandhandle Raima in court, Sakshi slapped him to defend her.

Where is this "not an iota of soul" thing?

Sakshi was shown crying over photos of Akram too.

There are enough instances to show they were grey. Even producer's interview and actors' interviews had mentioned that each character had shades and was not a unidimensional villain or good guy only.
But story was haphazardly handled. Plus typical desi audience cannot appraise shaded, layered characters and want only stereotype clear black or white this is why of late, Goenkas have been blackened like coal!

Irrespective of shades, villains run this show. Empires get slowly weakened and do not fall down in one day! Slow destruction has been there from day one of Goenkas.



i agree with all these...but such repents, regrets mean nothing wen at the end of the day they kill and rape mercilessly...yes sakshi chides shaurya for the way he leads his life but then goes on to kill and bribe ppl to save him...that is not the way to teach her son a lesson...

yes she considered raima as her soul sister...but then all negative characters love someone or the other in their life...and before she came to know of rajnath-raima truth she had no reason not to love raima...but the instant she learnt the truth she went on to kill her mercilessly too (its another thing raima is not dead)... how can a "grey" character be so merciless with someone whom just a day before she considered as a soul sister...

yes she does not uses her own children to play games...but that is a positive character compared to rajnath...that is not a positive character in a standalone way...it is just that she is bad in many ways except in this way...and how can we say she does not use her children...if that is so then no way rajnath cud hv convinced her...if she really cares for her daughter then she wudnt hv supported rajnath...this only shows that if there is no their option then she wud also use her children...it is just that sakshi has never needed to use her daughter...

and being worried about kangna's studies is no big deal...every parent does so...they hv played the role of parents well in the sense that they hv gvn then proper education and lifestyle...but when there is a son like shaurya who rapes and does not repent...and again and again makes bets with friends to rape other girls (first payal then durga and god knows how many else)...i wont call such parents ideal if a son is convinced that if he rapes a 100 girls still he will be safe because of his parents...
Edited by adoremevirgo - 10 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".