Is it the way enquiry is conducted?

Is it the way enquiry is conducted?

Without written arguments and accusations?

Can a suspended officer sign his own arrest warrant?

No definitely not. The enquiry was too short and not detailed at all. I expected the officers to question Shiv more and try to find out stuff from the bottom but it looked like they aren't interested or they have already made up their mind on what the final decision would be 😳

Coming to the arrest part I firstly fail to understand on what basis did they arrest Shiv? Did they get any proof?? And coming to signing the arrest warrant is also.something new I heard of 😕

Surprisingly, the inquiry was somewhat logical except the members were not seen taking notes and importantly - missing female members (BV is way too patriarchal in such cases, no female panchayat member also). As per rules, Complaint Committee must have at least 50% of female members. There are no written arguments or charges in such committees, the members generally prepare the questions to be asked (not necessarily in writing) in advance though. It is more like fact-finding committee and disciplinary action will be taken based on recommendation of the committee. The duration was also OK because the committee examines the accused, the accusers and the people present at the time of incidents/other staff as deemed necessary one by one. It is not like court case or even a disciplinary case.

I guess the enquiry is only a name sake enquiry just to show that there has been an enquiry conducted the result will either be inconclusive or against him.Most likely he won't get justice there and he will be arrested for abettment to suicide and it will go to court.

I felt it was like some court martial.

In disciplinary cases, there are elaborate arrangements like appointing enquiry authority, defence(if sought) etc. And also a note served listing charges.

The strict bespectacled officer was clever compared to the pliable sympathetic one.

Why shiv allowed rasika to discuss family matters?

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

I felt it was like some court martial.

In disciplinary cases, there are elaborate arrangements like appointing enquiry authority, defence(if sought) etc. And also a note served listing charges.

The strict bespectacled officer was clever compared to the pliable sympathetic one.

Why shiv allowed rasika to discuss family matters?

@Aparna, I do not expect the creatives to know the rules, but this time, they actually show a complaint committee, and I am happy with this fact. In such cases, if the committee finds the man guilty, there will be disciplinary case independent of any criminal case filed.

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

I felt it was like some court martial.

In disciplinary cases, there are elaborate arrangements like appointing enquiry authority, defence(if sought) etc. And also a note served listing charges.

The strict bespectacled officer was clever compared to the pliable sympathetic one.

Why shiv allowed rasika to discuss family matters?

Hope now rasika will be completely happy seeing shiv behind bars.
I think even DB will be happy as she could not make shiv go against anandi and amol.

Now anandi will be in action as shiv will be in judicial custody.

http://www.hhsonline.org/sexual-harassment-at-work-place/do-and-donts-for-committees.html

According to it, a woman has to head this committee.

Why cant shiv file a counter sexual harassment case against rasika? They may say it is an afterthought but shiv may put forth proper arguments like how rasika started it all.