The Final Battle! A letter to the Shehenshah. - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

56

Views

4.7k

Users

24

Likes

229

Frequent Posters

minnie2308 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: RadhikaS0


Minnie,

I don't want to go off topic. But if one sides with Jo, one is labeled a feminist in a not so nice way. 😕The entire meaning of being a feminist is twisted to mean one who is unreasonably demanding and a veritable harridan. The positivity associated with it, the image of one who is assertive, independent, self-thinking, self-sufficient is negated.

What I'm getting at is that it's not nice being called a feminist here, as I have also experienced.

Dear Radhika,
Here is what Wiki says about Feminism and I stand by it 😛
"Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women.[1][2] This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women."

Again, I have never defended inequality ! Let all human live peacefully and wholesomely😃.

Anyhow, Kaana's thread is so interesting, I am sure we can all go a little off-topic. She is too cool to mind as I could guess by her lovely response😊
Again, 😃 when I said being labeled a feminist, I meant, the folks who not agree with Jo's ideologies call those who agree with her ideology as feminists, off course in a degrading way. But then that does not make any difference to me. I stand by the above and never shy from my stand.
And who says I do not critisise JO can't be more wrong. I do that often and in not very nice words.
Here's what else Feminism is " since feminism seeks gender equality, it must necessarily include men's liberation because men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles."
😆
I jumped to Wiki yesterday to get official definition of Feminism and realised it matched with what I thought it was.
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: AKT.JA


I have been trying to understand good and bad nature and consequences of prejudices all my life, so I'll take this opportunity to make one comment. (Off track is fine, because JA is going through a rather ho hum phase.)

Human beings have limited intellectual, emotional, social, and material resources. There is nothing wrong if you invest your resources towards your family, gender, city, religion, clan, whatever. Or towards a specific and favorite cause outside your own identity, like orphans, widows, "nirdosh pashu pakshi", :) environment etc.

A line is crossed when one's loyalty to the chosen identity or cause becomes so intense that one forgets that only God is perfect, when one is unable to see or accept the truth when it disagrees from what one would have liked it to be. People like that become incapable of investigating an issue or searching for knowledge, because only those conclusions are permitted that agree with the prejudice. In the end, if they are not sidelined, they will harm the cause they wish to support.

I think that's the dividing line. Any label is just a word. You can be a good feminist (or any other kind of partisan) or a bad one, and the choice is up to you, and by that I mean each one of us.


Thank you for a beautiful post.

It's not about my (or anyone else) being a good or bad feminist. It's a question of how I (or anyone else) view(s) someone. I have observed on a few occasions that there is a tendency to deride someone as being feminine or feminist, insinuating in the process that the person so derided is using feminine "guile" or "other tactics" to have her own wilful way when in truth, she may be going down a just path and deserving of all credit/success that comes her way.

It's a matter of perception. Each to his own. 😊
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: minnie2308

Dear Radhika,

Here is what Wiki says about Feminism and I stand by it 😛
"Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, cultural, and social rights for women.[1][2] This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in education and employment. A feminist advocates or supports the rights and equality of women."

Again, I have never defended inequality ! Let all human live peacefully and wholesomely😃.

Anyhow, Kaana's thread is so interesting, I am sure we can all go a little off-topic. She is too cool to mind as I could guess by her lovely response😊
Again, 😃 when I said being labeled a feminist, I meant, the folks who not agree with Jo's ideologies call those who agree with her ideology as feminists, off course in a degrading way. But then that does not make any difference to me. I stand by the above and never shy from my stand.
And who says I do not critisise JO can't be more wrong. I do that often and in not very nice words.
Here's what else Feminism is " since feminism seeks gender equality, it must necessarily include men's liberation because men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles."
😆
I jumped to Wiki yesterday to get official definition of Feminism and realised it matched with what I thought it was.


Minnie,

Am beginning to enjoy talking to you as much as with some others! 😆

@ underlined: this is the only part i was referring to. Otherwise I am fully in tune with what u say about feminism and gender equality. 😊

I would not want to support Jo blindly and criticize Jalal, just because I'm a woman and a feminist. So now we both seem to be in similar places. 😊

Also pls see my response to AKT.JA. it might further clarify what I was hinting at. 😆
Edited by RadhikaS0 - 11 years ago
minnie2308 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#54
^ Radhika... saw that response you wanted me to see.
It is in sync with what I feel.
if we think through, my Nani, Mom, me and my daughter are all 21st century women (or girls..😉) But we are so different in thinking. ...
So how can all 16th century wives be tied and died in the same color...flummoxed. But don't you dare respond to me OK!
I have work...I am in office... I am poor and I need money...😡
nini06 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#55
SsUPeR DUpeR 👍🏼... TO ur post dear...!
LUVED every bit of ur post..😃...especially your comparisons to earlier situations👏...
I agree with you... it's jalal internal battle that he needs to focus now...then only he would be able to win it...😊( i fear how much broken he would be, when he knows ma's truth..that would be altogether a new battle..)..
your qoute :hat's off...a big .🤗 from my side...!!
Heart is not a toy to be used and thrown by one's whims and fancy...

PS. i agree you should even write a letter to jo...she also needs ur guidance...afterall she too is a human she also commits mistakes..😉..and then we may understand jo's point of view too...😊
Kaana thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#56
I bow down to my Senior😊 Especially, when I am on the verge of graduating into my next level from Newbie😉
Kaana thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: MaddyO



Thanks Minnie and Kaana for clarifying - my mistake at not checking - please excuse.

Kaana - NO this is one thing I will NEVER be convinced about. It remains a horrible thing - I do not know any person who would do that to even an unknown woman - she will never be left out like this. Jalal should have stayed with Jodha and I will never ever agree with anybody about this.

As for yielding to Jodha's wish - remember the scene before where even after goading and encouraging Jodha to stand for election Jalal goes to SB to ask her how to get out of this - he did not want to choose! So that means he did not want to take Jodha's side against Rukayya. Cos if he himself encouraged her means he thought Jodha capable so why the hesitation! That was because he did not want to hurt Rukayya.

Jodha just told him to vote for Rukayya and took him out of this dilemma, so also SB.
Jodha at first did not want to stand for haram post and she put the people she loves before the post. She chose to make Jalal and SB relieved - if she won even when they did not vote for her then ok by her. This is hardly similar to Jodha sleeping outside in the open.

Forget husband NO man should do that to any woman!

Maddy, thanks for pushing me to think further on this. Minnie's thought of him getting everybody to sleep under the sky in the name of awaam role they are playing seem to be a good thing to have done. Though my basic thought on this remains, but definitely, Jalal would have been wiser to do that. There was scope to handle this better.
Thanks Minnie for bringing this up, great thought.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".