The Final Battle! A letter to the Shehenshah. - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

56

Views

4.7k

Users

24

Likes

229

Frequent Posters

Kaana thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: minnie2308

😊 Kaana! Thanks for clarifying.

I really do not see anything wrong in being a feminist.
I have always hailed Jalal/ Jo for all their good deeds.
But here, yes, upon siding with Jo there are chances of being called a feminist!
You write well. Please continue

Thanks Minnie, that was so very nice of you to have accepted it. Regd, being a feminist - I totally agree with you, nothing wrong in being one. It is all about what one believes in. And I have due regards for them. Just that my taste is different.
I loved your line "I have always hailed Jalal/ Jo for all their good deeds". It is so refreshing. It is nice to see even a comment such as this. Yeah, both have their goodness. As I had mentioned elsewhere before, Jalal is not inherently evil. As you had beautifuly put in above, with Jodha's company (which you had mentioned), his latent goodness is coming to the fore.
Thanks again for coming in, it was awesome knowing you.
Kaana thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: history_geek

Hi Kaana,

Buddy delete some messages from your inbox. Seems the inbox limit has been exhausted.
Even inbox has a limit.😉

As you are a newbie, there is a restrcition on sending PMs per day, limited posts per day, and also limited inbox size.

Abhay

Done Ji. And if you had sent any links etc., can you pl resend those msgs please even if its a bother?😉
And, when will I ever be stripped of my "Newbie" status. I understood it to be 25 posts, it is close to about 40 now - still ???
Can someone throw some light on this please?
Kaana thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: ann2012

Wonderful post Kaana 👏👏⭐️

The comparisons that you made were marvelous. He is still treating her like an object and sees her own will as bloated ego. Jodha is definitely proud and has an ego, agreed. But her ego isn't bloated. The pride demeanor is a part of her. And he means to break it 🤢

Talking about his own hurt, love and pain. But is it enough? Shouldn't he ask her about the betrayal she feels? She laid bare her emotions in the letter and in the monologue after Jalal rescued. But dearest Shehenshah, did you actually understand all of it?

After Jodha's monologue, Jalal said he knew he had caused Jodha pain but now since he had travelled and pinned for her, he deserves her forgiveness. He saw her agony but did he understand the reason? If he did, then he wouldn't have asked for her forgiveness so directly without even completely grasping the gist of the problem. He preferred to label her as an egoist and believe that he had done his part in the reconciliation.

But that is classic Jalal. Reaching a rapid conclusion based on half-baked information and understanding

Hi Ann, great to hear from you. Hopefully, this letter to him should help him see things😉
And did you notice one thing - until the time at Amer, when he called her egoist, he actually had not mentioned that she caused the whole issue by hiding things from him. So long he had been only asking her to forgive. Interesting! Some insight into his character.
MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: Kaana

Thanks Minnie for clarifying.
Yes Maddy, I am fine with the tent decision taken that day. There were situations later also, when Jalal yielded to Jodha's wish , example: voted in favour of Ruqaiyya during Harem election. Even Salima did that.



Thanks Minnie and Kaana for clarifying - my mistake at not checking - please excuse.

Kaana - NO this is one thing I will NEVER be convinced about. It remains a horrible thing - I do not know any person who would do that to even an unknown woman - she will never be left out like this. Jalal should have stayed with Jodha and I will never ever agree with anybody about this.

As for yielding to Jodha's wish - remember the scene before where even after goading and encouraging Jodha to stand for election Jalal goes to SB to ask her how to get out of this - he did not want to choose! So that means he did not want to take Jodha's side against Rukayya. Cos if he himself encouraged her means he thought Jodha capable so why the hesitation! That was because he did not want to hurt Rukayya.

Jodha just told him to vote for Rukayya and took him out of this dilemma, so also SB.
Jodha at first did not want to stand for haram post and she put the people she loves before the post. She chose to make Jalal and SB relieved - if she won even when they did not vote for her then ok by her. This is hardly similar to Jodha sleeping outside in the open.

Forget husband NO man should do that to any woman!

ShadeOfWhite thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago
#45
Hey Kaana, loved your post very very much!!!👏👏👍🏼
The reasoning is awesome...keep posting such stuffs.

I agree to you..separation is required between JaJo..only then they will both understand what is missing in their relationship, what is the stands of them in each other's life..and Jalal will understand what he needs to do to win Jodha's trust, not her love as she is already in love with him..Jodha needs an assurance that in future if such situation comes up, Jalal will have faith in her, will believe her...she has seen Jalal in his worst avatar..and yes, we also know when he is in rage, he becomes wild..she fears this state of him as Jalal loses his senses and goes out of control and takes decision without giving a thought...she doesnt want to face the same wrath..this shake in their relationship was needed.

Right now, Jodha needs her own space, time to think, to judge, to analyse, to nurture...she will come back to Jalal on her own..no need to to force her...whatever Jalal had to do, he already did...now both have to work on building the mutual trust...both have trust issues...its both of their duties to build it.

I wanted to write more..but I got cut in my hand..so it hurts while typing.



looking forward to your posts😊
Edited by tamy267 - 11 years ago
MaddyO thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: Kaana

Done Ji. And if you had sent any links etc., can you pl resend those msgs please even if its a bother?😉
And, when will I ever be stripped of my "Newbie" status. I understood it to be 25 posts, it is close to about 40 now - still ???
Can someone throw some light on this please?



Kaana - I think it is 50 posts - so hopefully soon 😆

RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: minnie2308

😊 Kaana! Thanks for clarifying.

I really do not see anything wrong in being a feminist.
I have always hailed Jalal/ Jo for all their good deeds.
But here, yes, upon siding with Jo there are chances of being called a feminist!
You write well. Please continue


Minnie,

I don't want to go off topic. But if one sides with Jo, one is labeled a feminist in a not so nice way. 😕The entire meaning of being a feminist is twisted to mean one who is unreasonably demanding and a veritable harridan. The positivity associated with it, the image of one who is assertive, independent, self-thinking, self-sufficient is negated.

What I'm getting at is that it's not nice being called a feminist here, as I have also experienced.
history_geek thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: Kaana

Done Ji. And if you had sent any links etc., can you pl resend those msgs please even if its a bother?😉
And, when will I ever be stripped of my "Newbie" status. I understood it to be 25 posts, it is close to about 40 now - still ???
Can someone throw some light on this please?



Yeah...Till 50 posts (perhaps) you are a newbie. then a groupbie.
After 200 posts you become a senior member. and then you can post as many posts per day withput any restriction.

Also, as your membership status rises your inbox size will also increase.

Will respond to your post. Need to read it again. 😊 Wonderfully written. 👏
RadhikaS0 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: Kaana

Hey Radhila, lovely to have you back. And as always there is no death for your extra kind words. Thanks a bunch.

Thanks and welcome! 😆

You have given me an assignment now, asking such a question!!!!

My quick response here to your query. I owe Rima one too and hopefully it might provide some answers too.

Pl bear with me, and if I can share my thoughts too while I respect your views, I am not sure if I would want to agree with two things stated - Jalal abandoned her yet again, Jodha's fear of being abandoned again. In my humble view, based on my understanding so far, this is not in their character. A quick reason: he did not just abandon her when she committed suicide, twice?, Jodha's temperament and Rajvanshiness may not lend this fear possible.

Jalal's POV - no point in continuing on a relationship which has fallen apart. And does it make sense to continue to live together in the palace in such a state? So, in this situation, as understood then by him, only option is to separate and he freed her of the rishta. Giving an ultimatum to leave by the first ray of tom morning, was an emotional outcome of a devastated soul. Is it justified? Yes and No, in my view. I suppose, earlier also when he was ready to give talaq, he was trying to do a prayaschit for his act of cruelty to her so long. This was not abandoning as such - but done with a genuine intent to relieve her of the pain she undergoes here and send her back to a place where she will be happy. However, whether this act per say is right is something that is questionable. In the process he has caused more pain to her. That is the Jalal!!!!

From Radhika: I respect your views Kaana. But I still believe that he should not have taken the extreme step of relieving her from the relationship in the heat of the moment. What he said could be excused. But he should have allowed himself time to cool down before taking a rash decision (of asking her to leave). Someone told me recently that one should never do something permanently stupid just because one is temporarily upset.

After the MC track, he may have viewed his offer of talaq as a benevolent gesture. But when we give someone a gift, we must see what they want, not what we would like to give. He should have known that for a Rajvanshi woman, taking talaq and returning to her parents' home is not an option. You have mentioned that he saved her from suicide twice. The first time, he saved her for the sake of the prestige of the Mughal sultanat, not because he feared losing her. Only the second time was he scared of losing her because he had developed feelings for her. And anyway, the second time cannot be termed as a suicide because her intention was not to kill herself but to save Jalal.

Jodha's POV - trust fallen apart, relationship broken and abandoned, vachan not adhered to, would like to move out. It is a fact that she also wanted to move out, though husband order has been given as a reason and maybe a reason also. For that matter, technically, she has abandoned him at all these times stated. So per say fear of being abandoned by someone may not fit in well for her is my view, I may be wrong also. But she is very much disturbed, not happy and tired of Jalal's two way behaviour.

@underlined: I don't know, Kaana. I have not got this feeling that she wanted to move out.Being a Rajvanshi, she would have stuck it out with him till death, considering it as part of her duty. I believe she left only because he specifically asked her to. If he had just said all those words but not asked her to go, she would not have gone. This is my considered opinion. But we can always disagree on this amiably. 😊

@bold: I do not understand this at all, I am afraid. How can Jodha be said to have abandoned him? If he asks her to go and she goes, is that abandoning on her part? When she attempted suicide after MC track, he had asked her to pack up and go to Amer and even called her mother to take her back. If she attempted suicide in her condition because both her husband and mother didn't want her, how can she be said to be abandoning him?

When she drank poison to save his life, she did not wilfully take a decision to die or to abandon him and go away (to heaven).

In Friday's episode also, she didn't abandon him. She has been telling him repeatedly that she needs time to heal. She expected that as her husband, he would understand this and give her the space and time required by her to heal. But he mistook this to be her guroor. Instead of trying to understand what she actually wanted from him, or at least allowing her to recuperate in privacy, he was pressuring her to hurry up the process and return with him. Just as he couldn't stay back indefinitely in Amer, she also couldn't go to Agra with a conflicted mind.

At no point did she tell him to leave. In fact, she would have liked Jalal to have stayed at Amer for a few days, but in an unobtrusive yet supportive manner. When he informed her that he was leaving without her, she was stunned to say the least. She had tears in her eyes. Why I said he was "abandoning" (Notice the quotes 😃) her is that when she would have wanted his support in recuperating, he was walking away, leaving her bereft of that emotional support. If he had stayed and supported her, as he did when she freed her hand and ran away, she would have been insulated from her family's pressure too.

If I'm reading your words incorrectly, please clarify. Because I didn't quite get the abandoning part.

Life at Mathura: It was not a normal life in that she was getting depressed by Jalal thoughts. However, it was normal compared to now Amer or even before Jalal came to Mathura. This in my view could be because, till the time she saw him at Mathura, there was no clue that he is coming to get her back. She could have resigned to her new life of her own, pained and lonely life, which she is now coming to terms with. She had then no option of going back anyway, not that she wanted to. She accepted it as the way forward and was trying to settle in it.

I agree. It was not normal. But she was trying to make it as normal as possible under the circumstances.

But at Amer, things are different - she is pressurized on all possible grounds to return with him by Jalal, she is asked to go back in a way by her own folks, she cannot be not going back given her feelings for him and she does not want to go back being let down. And, there is an option to go back now, unlike before. She does not want to avail it, but do not want to let go it as well. So, when Jalal chose to return without her (not abandoned her - he had no option and was repeatedly asked to leave anyway), which maybe was quite unexpected by her, she is unable to come to terms with it. I am happy with this act of Jalal, she needed this jolt to come back to reality and now take some concrete steps, even if it takes some time. But without this, she may just be only sulking away and maybe in self sympathy while missing him also. But now, she is pushed to some action. Unlike Mathura, she cannot find any comfort in this state as she now very much has the option to go back to Jalal now (which is very much there at the bottom of her heart).

She always had the option to go back to him. Bharmal told her she could assert her rights as a daughter of the house. She could have asserted her rights as the daughter-in-law of the house and gone back to Agra at any time. But she wants to go there only when she is healed completely. As and when she wants to.

Regd your point 'Leaving her to pick up the pieces of yearning and feelings once more' - am not sure of this, as this is the first time this is happening after he knows of her love for him (may not apply to showdown night also). All these days, he was not even sure of her feelings. Again, he cannot be held responsible for leaving to Agra without her, it is absolutely Jodha's decision.

@bold: A person can break someone's heart without knowing the other person loves them. Jalal too need not be aware of her feelings to crush them. She knew on the night of the showdown and on Friday that she loves him. So when he asked her to leave on the showdown night and when he walked away on Friday, both times, he walked over her feelings.

@underlined: It was Jodha's decision. correct. but he drove her to that decision. If he had not pestered her continually for forgiveness but tried to understand what was going on in her mind, he would have known that she didn't want his apology but his respect for her identity.

And to specifically answer your last Q, the transformation has to happen in both and it is a gradual process. And there are no stated or specific actions that could instill any new impression or bring it to the desired state. Just like situations, approaches, behaviour, actions and reactions and impressions played a role in building the trust that was before this track, same even now.

Earlier, they were together and could see the changes in each other. Now they are away from each other. How can they know the transformation happening in the other person?

Separation is also expected to reveal a lot to Jodha herself. And, the new built trust in Jalal cannot be based only on Jalal's effort, but Jodha has a role in it too. She has to do her homework as well. Likewise, it cannot be achieved just by Jodha too, with her own self realisation. It has to be reassured by Jalal as well. So, both have a role to play to bring them together on a safe, strong ground.

Hope that I have been even partially successful in my attempt to answer you. Awaiting to hear your thoughts too. And you by now know how my brain works 😊, just tried to look at both sides!


Thanks Kaana!
AKT.JA thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: RadhikaS0

I don't want to go off topic. But if one sides with Jo, one is labeled a feminist in a not so nice way. 😕The entire meaning of being a feminist is twisted to mean one who is unreasonably demanding and a veritable harridan. The positivity associated with it, the image of one who is assertive, independent, self-thinking, self-sufficient is negated.


I have been trying to understand good and bad nature and consequences of prejudices all my life, so I'll take this opportunity to make one comment. (Off track is fine, because JA is going through a rather ho hum phase.)

Human beings have limited intellectual, emotional, social, and material resources. There is nothing wrong if you invest your resources towards your family, gender, city, religion, clan, whatever. Or towards a specific and favorite cause outside your own identity, like orphans, widows, "nirdosh pashu pakshi", :) environment etc.

A line is crossed when one's loyalty to the chosen identity or cause becomes so intense that one forgets that only God is perfect, when one is unable to see or accept the truth when it disagrees from what one would have liked it to be. People like that become incapable of investigating an issue or searching for knowledge, because only those conclusions are permitted that agree with the prejudice. In the end, if they are not sidelined, they will harm the cause they wish to support.

I think that's the dividing line. Any label is just a word. You can be a good feminist (or any other kind of partisan) or a bad one, and the choice is up to you, and by that I mean each one of us.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".