Balika Vadhu 27-2-14 written update - Page 2

Thank you Nightqueen.

Jagya-Dadisa with the family scene was very good, what a warm hug they shared and then Dadisa saying to all not to be jealous of dadi-pota, liked it very much.

Loved this episode! Jagya is so adorable and I'm glad the CVs didn't drag this track too much, its okay to show JaGan fighting but not for long they are too cute. I loved how the whole family was involved in this, made the scene adorable!!

Thanks for the WU.

The court case which could have been a very strong track was made a totally illogical track by CVs.
The entire case was based on just single evidence, the MMS. No other investigation regarding phone calls tracking or others involved in the crime. Saurabh's friends, Ankita & Payal were not even brought into picture.
Moreever, the judge did not even bother about why the DNA test turned negative when Saurabh was the real culprit!! He could have given orders for investigation regarding the same in the final verdict.
The technician at the so called trustworthy government lab would be roaming freely to accept more bribes to manipulate the reports

The case also lacked the drama & emotional quotient which was there previous court case.. Vivek Kabra bringing in the mobile did not have as dramatic effect as Shiv bringing in Payal or Ganga bringing in recorded mobile conversation in the previous case😆

The performances of Kabra and Shiv/Anandi/Shekhars as shattered family were good.
Precap- Slapping is not enough for that 🤬 Saurabh. Mummy Kabra did not have any effect after knowing the truth of her son .. Ira was atleast ashamed of her daughter's deeded after knowing the truth.

Singhs singing the song part was too funny 😆

Originally posted by: suzzane22

Thanks for the WU.

The court case which could have been a very strong track was made a totally illogical track by CVs.
The entire case was based on just single evidence, the MMS. No other investigation regarding phone calls tracking or others involved in the crime. Saurabh's friends, Ankita & Payal were not even brought into picture.
Moreever, the judge did not even bother about why the DNA test turned negative when Saurabh was the real culprit!! He could have given orders for investigation regarding the same in the final verdict.
The technician at the so called trustworthy government lab would be roaming freely to accept more bribes to manipulate the reports

The case also lacked the drama & emotional quotient which was there previous court case.. Vivek Kabra bringing in the mobile did not have as dramatic effect as Shiv bringing in Payal or Ganga bringing in recorded mobile conversation in the previous case😆

The performances of Kabra and Shiv/Anandi/Shekhars as shattered family were good.
Precap- Slapping is not enough for that 🤬 Saurabh. Mummy Kabra did not have any effect after knowing the truth of her son .. Ira was atleast ashamed of her daughter's deeded after knowing the truth.

Singhs singing the song part was too funny 😆

Thanks for update. BV tracks are like this only. No lawyer will do what Kabra did - providing proof of his own client being guilty. If they wanted to show Kabra as an honest person, who does not supports crime - they could have shown Kabra forwarding the MMS to Shiv/Anandi/prosecution lawyer and they in turn provided the proof to the court. As other forum members already pointed out - why the judge not asked the reasons of mismatched DNA report?

Originally posted by: SPuja

Thanks for update. BV tracks are like this only. No lawyer will do what Kabra did - providing proof of his own client being guilty. If they wanted to show Kabra as an honest person, who does not supports crime - they could have shown Kabra forwarding the MMS to Shiv/Anandi/prosecution lawyer and they in turn provided the proof to the court. As other forum members already pointed out - why the judge not asked the reasons of mismatched DNA report?

Their previous court case turned out about who is suitable bahu for badi haveli and the present case is about Sanchi badal chuki hai and a foolish lawyer is presenting proof against his own client.