Should Rushali be forgiven? Savitas was, so what is the difference?

Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
Savita kept Archana's children from her for 20 years with her lies and deceit; she was not held accountable but for a few days. it does not matter if she raised them well; she deprived them of the right to be with their mother and she with them. You cannot get back those years - EVER. However, in the end, Savita was forgiven.
Rushali did the same; so what is the difference? Why is one demonized and the other seen as a person who deserves to be forgiven and respected?

By the way, Savita only asked for Archana's forgiveness after she was promoted to by her husband otherwise she was too prideful. Additionally, when Manav tried to hold her accountable, he felt so guilty, he even apologized.

Archana never said a word in the same way Anitka did with Rushali - she brushed it off like it was no big deal.
Edited by Laila2009 - 10 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

2.4k

Users

11

Likes

28

Frequent Posters

Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
seems like people think it is ok for savita to do this?
Tanyaz thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
#3
Savita did not deserve to be forgiven for a long long time ..but Rushali kidnapped the little girl ..What Rushali did was a criminal act .She bribed the doctor and got the little girl replaced by a dead baby .
This deserves a jail sentence .

Even Pari should have been in jail as she too was part of a criminal activity . She took the child and gave it to unknown people without the father knowing about it .She actually wanted a horrible future for Aashi by giving her to such people who drugged the poor baby .

Both Pari and Rushali are safe thanks to Naren .He should have put them in prison .
ambolove thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#4
I'm not exactly sure what happened between Savita and archana but I got the gist that archana knew her babies before they left.
Whereas ankita was led to believe that she had given birth to a dead baby. For five years she had no idea that her baby was even alive. That is just plain cruel/evil.
Obviously not condoning either behaviour, both kept a mother away from her kids/kid. But rushali's behaviour takes the biscuit, definetely more worse than what Savita did in my opinion which was still very cruel.
Archana had the hope that she would meet her kids one day and they would accept her.
Ankita had that hope stolen away from her.

If you don't have hope then you have nothing.
Tulsi_Smriti thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#5
Here i would add...
I followed entire track as Archanaa is my favorite character (Not Ankitaa Karmarkar at all.. I hate Ankita karmarkar )

When kids were born, one year later on Ovi tejus first bday, Varsha kidnapped soham and ran away... this put more strain in archu manav relation (remember the chawl and DK sir incident were Archana was against Manav in court but she still loved him a lot)... Savita just used dis opportunity in her favour she did not do a criminal act at all...

Moreover Archu went out of Manav's life because of the strain in their Pavitra Rishta...I agree Savita Aai played a bad game but Shravani warned Archanaa by asking her not to trust Savita Aai at all...and the divorce also did not happen so Archu could any ways cum back but she did not...as she thought Manav did not need her at all...

you cannot compare Savitaa Aai n Rushali... & u can never ever compare Ankita karmarkar (Crap ) And Archanaa (my Sweetheart) at all in any case for sure.
Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

Savita did not deserve to be forgiven for a long long time ..but Rushali kidnapped the little girl ..What Rushali did was a criminal act .She bribed the doctor and got the little girl replaced by a dead baby .

This deserves a jail sentence .

Even Pari should have been in jail as she too was part of a criminal activity . She took the child and gave it to unknown people without the father knowing about it .She actually wanted a horrible future for Aashi by giving her to such people who drugged the poor baby .

Both Pari and Rushali are safe thanks to Naren .He should have put them in prison .


what is wrong is wrong. savita lied; she forged documents, she engaged in behaviors that were the same.

the point is if you TAKE a child from its mother do you deserve to be forgiven. all you are doing is arguing if one act is more criminal than the other and that savita still deserved forgiveness from keeping her children from a mother for 20 years? WOW.
Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: Tulsi_Smriti

Here i would add...

I followed entire track as Archanaa is my favorite character (Not Ankitaa Karmarkar at all.. I hate Ankita karmarkar )

When kids were born, one year later on Ovi tejus first bday, Varsha kidnapped soham and ran away... this put more strain in archu manav relation (remember the chawl and DK sir incident were Archana was against Manav in court but she still loved him a lot)... Savita just used dis opportunity in her favour she did not do a criminal act at all...

Moreover Archu went out of Manav's life because of the strain in their Pavitra Rishta...I agree Savita Aai played a bad game but Shravani warned Archanaa by asking her not to trust Savita Aai at all...and the divorce also did not happen so Archu could any ways cum back but she did not...as she thought Manav did not need her at all...

you cannot compare Savitaa Aai n Rushali... & u can never ever compare Ankita karmarkar (Crap ) And Archanaa (my Sweetheart) at all in any case for sure.


Doesn't matter if the act was criminal or not, she STILL deprived a mother from her children and she engaged in lying and deceitful behavior in order to orchestra a divorce - some of which could be considered criminal. Savita kept a mother from her children for 20 years, that is wrong.
Laila2009 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#8
For clarification BOTH Savita and Rushali engaged in unforgivable behaviors.
Changers thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: Laila2009

For clarification BOTH Savita and Rushali engaged in unforgivable behaviors.



agreed TM😊
nikitagmc thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#10
Both Savita and Rushali were wrong.
However, the big difference is that Archana was away from her kids more bcos of her own mistakes than Savita's.

It was shown that in the 20 years, Archana had been in touch with Vandu. Archana could have easily asked about her kids, contacted Manav and tried to reconcile etc. Just bcos he went away to America does not mean he is gone forever. Still Archana did not even know how her kids looked, she wasn't able to recognise Teju as her daughter.

Manav too believed his mother that Archana wanted divorce for money rather than her husband and daughters (yeah, the same Archana who loved being poor and living in that chawl and treated money as evil) and never contacted her again.

Savita had personal issues with Archana but somewhere it is also true that she was trying to safeguard her family- Manav and the two daughters as Archana's actions by that time had made everyone against her--- not only had she dragged Manav in court claiming he was fraud but also Soham was gone bcos of her. Savita created misunderstandings between Archana and Manav but did not separate Archana from her kids the way Rushali did to Ankita, who had no knowledge about her child all these years as she was told she had a still born.

Ovi-Teju staying away from Archana all these years was bcos of a combined set of fallacies of Archana-Manav and Savita. And all these years when Archana had not bothered about her daughters, Savita had been the one taking care of them and giving them love.

In this case however, Rushali was aware of the baby first, but was not concerned about the baby then as she did not want anything to do with Ankita or the baby- she had Pari and Naren was happy so that was all that mattered to her. She managed to convince Ankita to hide her relationship and pretty much everything else citing Naren's health problems and Ankita foolishly agreed and went through all hardships alone during her pregnancy. Rushali had no concern for the child at that point of time. Only when she realised Pari could never be a mother again and Pari-Naren were breaking apart cos of strain in relationship, she suddenly selfishly wanted Ankita's child for her son, and for that she STOLE Ankita's child replacing it with a dead baby. Neither Ankita nor Naren had any knowledge of anything till the very end, and Ankita lived those years crying about her dead baby.

Edited by nikitagmc - 10 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".