Originally posted by: archis_2013
Lol..I am a little tired of these die-hard romantics who see romance in everything 😆
If what was shown so far looked like Purvi romancing, then Ovi is no better isn't it? She is supposed to be grieving over her dead child and boiling over how she was she so naive about her childhood sweetheart's not-so-secret life before their marriage but she is busy going on shopping trips and romancing with her, er.. other friend Romil. I am still puzzled about the timing of Romil's call. This guy has a third eye and knows when to strike the deal... Really, a modern day miracle.
Oh, I forgot, there are different moral scales for Purvi and Ovi ...
Let the grand debate now begin ... Whose romance is now more pavitra ... 😊
All of the vitriolic hate against Ovi, I understand. But till now, I never understood the one thing that Ovi
cannot be accused of, atleast not something that has been shown on PR so far. This
angle with Romil. Where and when was this romance with romil shown, like ever? As women, why are we so eager and quick to not just judge, but in this case create something that has blatantly and constantly been shown to the contrary? Why are we so quick to assassinate the character of another woman--something our elders and traditions say is a women's greatest virtue. Being an "equalist", I believe it's the same for a man or a woman. But that's not the point here. Even now, there are people
in this forum wishing and hoping that Ovi's dead baby is actually fathered by Romil. When there have been no indications whatsoever of any kind of relationship, even a steadfast friendship, between the people in question. If anything, Ovi can be accused of loving one guy--arjun---too much; so much that she has been blind to the facts in that love. Done stupid things and ruined her own life. And now, because Ovi received a phone call from romil, one that we
presume she answered (it wasn't shown she did)---it means she's romancing him?
We, as professional women of an age where we're doing as well as or better than men career-wise; not by hiding behind closed doors but going neck to neck with them. Where we travel, alone, all over the world meeting and dealing with completely strange men
and women. Where we can have and maintain dignified and even close friendship with guys--single and married---it's disheartening and disconcerting to read such posts. Especially coming from, I assume, another young professional woman. No offense, but let's not go to such a place in defense/ offense of a fictional character---or even a real one.