Brief Update : 27th August 2012 - Page 6

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

That way Manav too listened to Dharmesh and didwhat Dharmesh wanted when he took the babies away from Archana ..

It was Sharmesh who came in his office and sufggested to him that Archana will not take good care of the twins ...Manav immediatel yreacted on this and did exactly what Dharmesh wanted ...he broke his family following Dharmesh's instructions ..

What Archaana did for Dharmesh was nothing compared to what Manav did ...

Dharmesh wanted Archana punished ...Manav did exactly that , he ruined Archana's life ..

Bu tGod was looking out for Archu and he gave her Purvi ...Now I just hope this girl gets married to Arjun eventually .Archana deserves to see Purvi's happiness ...

Originally posted by: sherma

it was hisdream wich lead him to do tat,he tld dharmesh out tat time,but his wrds were in his mind

that is what I am saying ..He did exactly what Dharmesh wanted him to do ...ruin Archana ...

and wat abt ovi,isnt ovi anyting to archu,

yes purvi deserve happiness,she is a pakka mammas girl,i as a viewer wld b very happy wid arvi marriage if it wld b by comforting ovi too,but arvi dint did tat,so am not very inn wid arvi marriage as 4 now

Ovi too deserves happiness... it is true that Archana is more close to Purvi because Purvi is not just a daughter but almost like a life saver for Archana ...and very close to ehr emotionaly but Archana loves all her three daughters .She would never want Ovi to get married to Arjun because tha twould ruin Ovi's life .

Ovi deserves someone who loves her and only her .

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

it was my reply to manv giving soham to varsha-satish legally,

i agree its only varsha fault here to give soham such a life,but wat manav wnted to do was also archu fault,she got soham attached to vrasha so much that for mths he used to saistywid him,manv tryedto stop her,cause of wich varsha becma obseesed by soham wich led to first kidnapping,again archu stopped manv to punish varsha

manav tld archu to keep soham away,again she made the same mistake wich lead to soham becuming vishnu

i mean u just cant blame varsha here,evn oday archu was telling to purvi hw gud sister and hw she thougt her to fight...

i mean give me a break yaar...

Originally posted by: Tanyaz

If this was real life and not fiction and Archana was my friend , I would be counting minutes for her divorce to happen ...

The only thing that makes me angry about Purvi and Archana is that they stil lrun after Manav .

Originally posted by: sherma

[

hwever gud arjun is,if purvi does like this,do u tink he will b okay wid it

maav too have never said anyting against archu in front of ovi-teju,but facts cant b chngedkarchu left ovi-teju when they needed her,i tink twins hate her more for tat.it wasnt shwn wat savita tld them incanada,but they hated her cause manav used to get sad remembering archu

Originally posted by: LoveTVShows

Tanyaz ji, Manav did asked Archana when she said she neveer signed divorce papers and he did asked her but she refused and insulted him infront of people and then again he asked her to comeback but she said I cannot live with Savita & Sachin but she never said to him why she dont want to live with Sachin & Savita . we know why but Manav dont know why . you are saying Archana giving importance to Manav but I say she is not giving importance to Manav or to her kids. she is giving importance to Sachin & Savita .

Teju & Ovi need their mother but just because Sachin wants his 52 years old to get married with 56 years old Manav, Archana agreed . She should tell everything about Savita & Sachin to Manav & her kids, I know they will not believe her but at least she should tell the truth.

In this divorce case Archana is 100% wrong, Manav is not god to know her inner thoughts or inner feeling

Its my point of view dear. feel free to disagree

Originally posted by: sowmya_jairam

Jai and Sherma, completely agree with your posts.

Tanya, if it was only them having different POVs, then nobody in the show can be blamed for anything. After all, everybody did what was right according to their POV-- from sulochana to her daughters and granddaughter; and from savita to her children and grandchildren. Even Varsha can't be blamed; because she did what she felt was right from her POV. It doesn't work that way. There is absolutely no way the court case can be justified-- even archana taking soham from manav and giving to varsha can be justified somehow, but not the court case.

Archana didn't just side with the chawl folks; she sided against manav and testified against him. If he had been convicted of fraud, he would have been thrown in jail and his assets seized. DK only lost his money; Manav lost his trust on his marriage and his respect. He could have lost his whole life. In real life, there was no way a marriage could have survived that sort of court case. That he was and is still willing to give his marriage a chance is the measure of how understanding he is, and how much he loves archana. No man or woman would feel charitable when their spouse publicly brings their different POV and makes it a court case. And that's when he was pleading her, time and again, that he didn't do fraud. That he was innocent. She didn't listen when he was telling her clearly that he didn't do what she was accusing hum of. And she didn't change her mind that he wasn't doing fraud after the case started either --- that was before she got pregnant and ended when she delivered the twins. So the timeline is atleast 9 months. She didn't tell him after the twins were born and he was acquitted by the court that she was wrong about him either. And that was when they were happily married before the court case began

Compare this scenario with what's happening now. They've been separated for 18 years and not with the happiest of goodbyes. Archana clearly tells manav she wants a divorce and alimony everytime he asks her. In the 6 months decreed by the court, he tells her he still wants her back in his life, but she tells him she only wants money. And he's supposed to understand her? Really? Isn't that terribly unfair?

Coming to purvi, she had no business talking to manav about calling the divorce off at all. She knows that archana initiated it and she's closer to archana, she should convince archana if she wants her father's love so much. And nowhere in this did I see any mention of the twins or sachu? Doesn't her picture of happy family include them? Or are the twins and sachu, savita and damo to be shipped off to canada or even better, antarctica; so that she, arjun, her aai and baba can be a happy family together?