As far as I can remember, I don't think Manav refers to Purvi as his daughter anywhere, in an explicit fashion. Even when he goes off to rescue her, he does not say he is going to rescue his 'daughter'. Today, he does not correct the prosecutor when he talks of Purvi as Manav's other daughter, and he does the same thing on various occasions earlier, no more. Why should he call her his daughter?
As I said earlier, I think he sends the saree as a gesture to placate Archana for his not attending the engagement, not for Purvi. There is no card with it, and not even an oral message thru Damodar. He does NOT tell Archana he is 'happy' for Purvi about her wedding, only that he has 'no problem with it', but for Ovi.
What he did, or what he felt for Purvi before the Arjun angle came up has no relevance at all now, but even then, he never told Purvi that you are my daughter, or even like my daughter. He is a kind-hearted man, and so even now, though he resents the Arjun-Purvi love affair deeply, when Purvi is in great distress at the hospital, he comforts her. But that does not mean that when these special circumstances no longer prevail, he will continue to be as kind. He reverts to his abruptness when he tells her to go to the police station, and not just when she calls to thank him for the saree, when one could say it was because Ovi was sleeping in his lap.
As I mentioned earlier, these two, Arjun and Purvi,seem to lack both sense and sensibility, and insist on accosting Manav at every opportunity, trying to force him to re-establish the old relationship without giving him time to get over his present resentment. Arjun is more at fault in this, for he knows that his responsibility for the mess Ovi is in now is a primary one, and that Manav has not forgiven him in the slightest, whereas Purvi was not to blame at all.
This said, even Purvi should not expect Manav to thaw towards them overnight just because she would then feel relieved and absolved of any guilt feelings. It is not a question of mixed signals from Manav, Ash, as I have tried to explain above. It is rather a question of Purvi not being able to, or rather not wanting to pick up perfectly clear signals. Archana, on the other hand, seems to understand Manav's current state of mind completely.
As for Vishnu's kasam, what is relevant is what HE told Arjun and Purvi about it the next day. A kasam of this kind is sacrosanct in the cultural milieu to which Vishnu belongs. You have to understand that he would believe that if he broke it, his mother would die. It is not something he would ever contemplate. This is a stupid slip up by the CVs, that is all.
As for the theory that Purvi recognises Varsha, even if only vaguely, why then does she not mention this very important point to Arjun at once? It seems very odd that she does not do so.
Jyothi, this is not a fraud case for character certificates to count. I do not know the legal position regarding such testimony by close family members, but the point is that NO such certificates should be taken into account at all in such a serious criminal case.
Shyamala
Originally posted by: jdronamraju
Shyamala,
I did update my post since my first words... I had to go back.. and edit it again .. I couldnt stay away..😊You are right, Arjun just waved a red flag in front of the bull asking for a reaction as such. He is just all into hero worshipping Manav and probably wants to be nice to him. I would have stayed away..But, still Manav's reactions, words and actions towards Purvi have been a yo-yo always. the poor gal is very confused with all this. On one hand, she was drilled the mahaanness of Manav by her Aai, and he seemed to reciprocate her affection to some extent before Arjun-Purvi relationship started..Even recently, why send the saree to Purvi, it was an important day for Purvi more so and not Archana. She probably thinks he is upset for Ovi but loves her like a daughter. He was nice to her in the hospital when Arjun was down. And he also keeps referring to her as his daughter, everywhere else. Why does he do that then? He should just stick to saying Archana's daughter. For a girl, who is starved for a fther's love, this is definitely confusing. even a smart one like Purvi.He should have stuck to his stand, that he rightly belongs to Ovi's side, as she is his daughter and that is it. And he would be right in doing so. Why did he tell Archana that he was happy for Purvi then for her wedding. Very contradictory behavior, dont you think?I had written earlier about why I think Purvi walked towards Varsha, not towards Vishnu. I htink she did seem familiar to her and am sure she will recognize her soon. That is where this is leading.. I think so.As far as Vishnu's kasam, I said it that day itself, he just did it to appease his mother. How can one change onself just to prove something to his mother. Atleast, I dont think he will.BTW, didnt sameer rane threaten him that once he gets a single proof, he will be back in jail. What happened to that? he didnt get any more sabooth than before. So, how does he think he can win this case?Is a spouse or a parent allowed to be a character witness? I thought that any support from them is null and void in the eyes of law.. or do I have that wrong?