Originally posted by: Ashlaika
Shyamala and Jyothi,
As far as I know (and I could be wrong) A parent, nor any close relative can be a character witness in a court proceeding nor can they issue a reference for you for any jobs. So... I don't see how Varsha's testimony on Vishnu's behalf will stand up in court. Other than to make for more drama of course.
Seriously, which mother will stand up in court and tell everyone that her son is bad or evil. You may only find this in 1% of mothers and that's for extreme circumstances. Varsha does not view this as an extreme case IMO, or she would have stopped this business long before.
Yes, Arjun may have looked for the reaction and answer he got. But, I think it was unfair to Purvi for she is given mixed signals by Manav and thats confusing for any child. Unlike Tej and Ovi who grew up hating Archu, Purvi grew up hearing only good things of Manav and feels that he is one of her own and can say or do nothing wrong. She doesn't even think or realise that he can hurt her mother.
I guess I feel Manav needs to make up his mind and stop leading her on... a child no matter their age will always be hurt by someone THEY considered a parent.
please note: I don't think Manav is wrong for staying in Ovi's corner... that is where he needs to be and thats where he should be. But... that doesn't have to make him unkind when he is a kind person.
Put like that, it makes perfect sense, Archana has brainwashed Purvi to love Manav just as Ovi and Tej have been taught to dislike Archana.