Originally posted by: sohan12345
WORST IS ARCHU WHO WAS SELLING PURVI FOR RS. 10,000. ARJUN IS SAID TO BE AN MBA FROM CANADA. HE CAN GET A WELL PAYING JOB WITH LITTLE EFFORT!
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 5th Dec, 2025
KAVERI IS BACK 5.12
Yami calls out the PR against Dhurandhar and Hrithik supports.
Let's talk Gen 3
Trp's crashed : Forced to change storyline
Noyna ‘Sarabhai’?!!
Dhurandhar has fair opening
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan & Kriti Sanon at the Red Sea Festival
SRK & Kajol at Leicester to unveil DDLJ statue.
Ambani s Swadeshi Event
Ranveer and Deepika at an event today
India Entertainment awards - Bollywood Hungama Kriti Vicky Ahaan Aneet
Originally posted by: sohan12345
WORST IS ARCHU WHO WAS SELLING PURVI FOR RS. 10,000. ARJUN IS SAID TO BE AN MBA FROM CANADA. HE CAN GET A WELL PAYING JOB WITH LITTLE EFFORT!
Arjun did not mean it to be a charity or a substitute when he gives his share to Ovi, he says so, "i dont have anything else to give her.. this is not a substitute for her happiness"...he just wanted to do something for her,and that is all he had..so he gave her those...u may not agree but .i see it that way...
hmm..interesting'but should Arjun be evaluated on the same scale too'how is he different'I mean does he thinks that the shares are his substitute'as far as I know Ovi did ask for them nor want the'or is Arjun doing some charity'but then wait'does Ovi needs charity'what is with Arjun that he can buy himself out by giving these shares to Ovi'now to me one is using 2 different scales to evaluate these two characters'.interesting no doubt'what we do, to justify these fictitious characters'beats me'😕
arjun also paid for ovi's heartbroken by transferring his share to ovi.but we never criticised arjun but all arvi fan after archana bc all jealous of archana .archana is lead and doing PR for 3years and made PR no1 in all channel .ekta has to focus on archana manav more bc if new generation can make PR no1 again then ekta cut the role of manav archana and concentrate on only new generation.its aweful to see every arvi fan ready to criticize archana🤢what type of adjective all using😡Originally posted by: sohan12345
WORST IS ARCHU WHO WAS SELLING PURVI FOR RS. 10,000. ARJUN IS SAID TO BE AN MBA FROM CANADA. HE CAN GET A WELL PAYING JOB WITH LITTLE EFFORT!
Originally posted by: sohan12345
WORST IS ARCHU WHO WAS SELLING PURVI FOR RS. 10,000. ARJUN IS SAID TO BE AN MBA FROM CANADA. HE CAN GET A WELL PAYING JOB WITH LITTLE EFFORT!
If Arjun had given it to Ovi directly, YES, that would be totally wrong..and it would be like buying her out..But, it was just a gesture on his part...nothing more..nothing less... He could have still kept those shares..because all manav asked that Arjun not work in the company..he didnt say that he needs to give up everything...Originally posted by: soapwatcher1
Jyothi, I agree, Arjun didn't mean to "buy out" Ovi's happiness. He needed to leave the company to make way for Manav to stay. The shares would have made him still part owner, if he gave them to Manav, Manav wouldn't have taken them (at least I don't think he would have though I was surprised he accepted them for Ovi) so Arjun gives the shares to Ovi, killing two birds with one stone, complying with what Manav wanted "throw your son out of the company" and giving the shares to someone whom he has wronged. Ovi, on the other hand, deliberately and openly asked Purvi to set a price on her love for Arjun, Ovi gave Purvi a blank check, asked Purvi to enter a figure, came back and coldly told Purvi, she (Ovi) knew that Purvi would want more. That is barter unlike the voluntary gifting of shares with no word spoken as to "these shares are to set me free from your love."
Originally posted by: jdronamraju
Arjun did not mean it to be a charity or a substitute when he gives his share to Ovi, he says so, "i dont have anything else to give her.. this is not a substitute for her happiness"...he just wanted to do something for her,and that is all he had..so he gave her those...u may not agree but .i see it that way...
Yes, I guess we have different perceptive on this issue…to me Ovi neither needed those shared or wanted them…to me Arjun degraded not only their previous childhood friendship but also degraded the respect he had for himself and Ovi by this single act…….but yes lets agree to disagee…
Originally posted by: jdronamraju
Arjun did not mean it to be a charity or a substitute when he gives his share to Ovi, he says so, "i dont have anything else to give her.. this is not a substitute for her happiness"...he just wanted to do something for her,and that is all he had..so he gave her those...u may not agree but .i see it that way...
hmm..interesting'but should Arjun be evaluated on the same scale too'how is he different'I mean does he thinks that the shares are his substitute'as far as I know Ovi did ask for them nor want the'or is Arjun doing some charity'but then wait'does Ovi needs charity'what is with Arjun that he can buy himself out by giving these shares to Ovi'now to me one is using 2 different scales to evaluate these two characters'.interesting no doubt'what we do, to justify these fictitious characters'beats me'😕
Originally posted by: soapwatcher1
Jyothi, I agree, Arjun didn't mean to "buy out" Ovi's happiness. He needed to leave the company to make way for Manav to stay. The shares would have made him still part owner, if he gave them to Manav, Manav wouldn't have taken them (at least I don't think he would have though I was surprised he accepted them for Ovi) so Arjun gives the shares to Ovi, killing two birds with one stone, complying with what Manav wanted "throw your son out of the company" and giving the shares to someone whom he has wronged.
Ovi, on the other hand, deliberately and openly asked Purvi to set a price on her love for Arjun, Ovi gave Purvi a blank check, asked Purvi to enter a figure, came back and coldly told Purvi, she (Ovi) knew that Purvi would want more. That is barter unlike the voluntary gifting of shares with no word spoken as to "these shares are to set me free from your love."