Who is the BAD MOM *Viewbies Notepg21* - Page 11

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

She has been a good mother to other kids- Sachu, Punni etc.

She PROVIDES , yes . She cannot PROTECT . A mother provides and protects BOTH .

She is capable of giving food to baby and looking after it in sickness . She will be unable to protect its interests and fight for it .

In that sense , I admire Rasika . She is one hell of a woman when it comes to protecting her cubs . She will fight tooth and nail . ONE slap to her daughter and she had dragged damad by his balls to Mahila samiti and made him apologise in front of ALL . One injustice to Ajit and she fought dharmesh in his company and demanded legitimate reasons for FIRING him . She fulfils the function of PROTECT very well .

Archana's two sisters r capable of protecting their children . Archana isn't .

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

She has been a good mother to other kids- Sachu, Punni etc.

She PROVIDES , yes . She cannot PROTECT . A mother provides and protects BOTH .

She is capable of giving food to baby and looking after it in sickness . She will be unable to protect its interests and fight for it .

In that sense , I admire Rasika . She is one hell of a woman when it comes to protecting her cubs . She will fight tooth and nail . ONE slap to her daughter and she had dragged damad by his balls to Mahila samiti and made him apologise in front of ALL . One injustice to Ajit and she fought dharmesh in his company and demanded legitimate reasons for FIRING him . She fulfils the function of PROTECT very well .

Archana's two sisters r capable of protecting their children . Archana isn't .

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Kools, today Archana wanted to return Soham to Varsha NOT because Varsha was begging for her, but because she felt depressed and disappointed that she knew so little about her baby (even though I know it is majorly her fault), especially after Varsha taunted her.

She thought of Soham's betterment and didn't wish to hurt him or make him suffer cos of the temporary mother arrangement (same what we were saying). She wanted to stay with Soham very badly and yet didn't want him to suffer- she realised that this sudden separation from Varsha had not been taken well by the baby, so she said let Varsha take him, I will come and meet him everyday and when he grows familiar and comfortable with me, then I will take him away.

She didn't say that lets give the baby away to Varsha. She is still trying to make an attempt to make HERSELF worthy of the baby, make the baby trust her and accept her first. She hasn't admitted defeat STILL.

The decision is debatable, but somewhere the thought behind it touched me.

Originally posted by: bhallarox

Kool Di, Rasika did do good in protecting Ajit from Dharmesh and going to mahila smaithi for her daughter. But when Dharmesh did even worse to Manav and took him to jail and accused him of chor, how come Rasika just stayed quiet?

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Coz Manav is not HER KID . She is an awful person but as a mom she fulfils the PROTECT FUNCTION .😃

Viewbies Note: absolutely NO name calling or bashing is allowed of characters and also no personal attacks on members is allowed either. Please refrain from doing so or else topic will be closed.

PR Dev Team