Star Of The Day: 6th Dec 2010 - Page 11

Originally posted by: dew_drop

Manav has become the central part of this show. Everything tht happens somehow revolves around him. Tis kinda importancw is given only for female leads. For instance, 'kya woh log mujhe apnaayenge?' 🤣 and wen Mannu entered his sasuraal the camera focused on him like an unwelcomed nayi dulhan.
Its quiet refreshing I must say.. A male lead going through such nonsenses.

Originally posted by: SaffyFlower

Niki😆😆

The point is Manav himself is admitting to all his mistakes,that I don need to elaborate anymore,which is why am liking him now😆

The story till now was abt Archu falling in love with Manav,now it is gonna be about Manav's resurrection,to measure up to Archu.So hez gonna face many failures until then

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

Niki good post abv...Agree with ya...Manav VS Satish

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

I voted for Sulo...She is acting as sound, caring mother and trying her best to be respectful to Manav...Love the way Manohar blinked his eyes in approval in bringing ArMan home...

Varsha, Vaishu and Manju have totally lost it...Vinod is somewhat right but Manju needs to let him be the decision maker as he is Archu's bro...

FBD and Satish staying out is the right decision IMHO...

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Saffy, I'll put across my views in points:

1.) Manav vs Satish in how they tackled Archu: Both were sensible, it is neither of theirs fault. Manav said everything that was required to be said. So did Satish. I am quite tempted to say actually that it was Archu's fault that she did not have even common sense to understand Manav's point and herself draw the conclusion that if jay dumped her one year after marriage, then her family would never be happy. Satish literally had to baby feed this fact to Archu, this is the only difference I see between Manav's way of tacking Archu and Satish's way of tacking Archu.

5.) Till now Satish hasn't revealed that it was he who told Archu to run away, or that Manav is at no fault in this running away business at all. Everyone including Sulo, Dharmu, thinks Manav instigated Archu to run away. This is the root cause of all the problems that ArMan are going through now.

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

I don't consider him a loser Niki .He did prove that he is a man of his words by doing this but as I told you earlier , I am lookign at the drama with a different view . I look for the love story and unfortunately his that one action , killed the love story from his side because he was ready to let go ofArchan despite knowing that she will be gone forever ...

From that point of view I find his action unforgivable ..Not just me even Kool was sayign that day that ' what does it leave for the romance now ', even thoug hKool was happy that he did not dump Shravani ...

Yes he did good for Shraavni but he did not think for Archana ...

And you knwo what , even he is ashamed of all that .He is ashamed of constantly neglecting Archana's needs an her happiness and always giving his own family the priority .that is what he todl satish ...and even today called himself foolish ..

All that he is doing now is to make up for all that Archu had to go through ...

I hope he does well this time with this second chance that he has been given and makes it up to his wife ....

Edited by Tanyaz - 14 years ago

Originally posted by: nikitagmc

Saffy, I'll put across my views in points:

1.) Manav vs Satish in how they tackled Archu: Both were sensible, it is neither of theirs fault. Manav said everything that was required to be said. So did Satish. I am quite tempted to say actually that it was Archu's fault that she did not have even common sense to understand Manav's point and herself draw the conclusion that if jay dumped her one year after marriage, then her family would never be happy. Satish literally had to baby feed this fact to Archu, this is the only difference I see between Manav's way of tacking Archu and Satish's way of tacking Archu.

Wrong again Nikki. If Jay was only criminal as per Manav's explanation to Archu,Archu was willing to live with Jay a tortorous life,that was her sacrifice for the sake of family.Her marriage with Jay wud have been hell,but she wud have kept quiet,not complaining and been married for life,just to pls Sulo.Sulo point blank did not want Archu kumaari anymore,that was the msg from Sulo and Mano all along.

Manav DID NOT tell Archu that Jay had come to meet him and jay told him categorically that he was gonna dump Archu 1 yr after marriage.Then her sacrifice for family wud'nt wrk,she wud'nt be married after a year na.

Look carefully the difference between wat Satish revealed and Manav revealed.
Manav messed up communicating the msg in toto.Satish gave Archu NEW information

2.) Satish's tacking of the Jay situation: He should have told all the members of the house that he had heard Jay say that he would destroy Archu and take over the company. The K house trusts him too much. They would have listened to him.

Yes,Archu I think expected Satish to manage the situation in the house,she told that to Manav too.But Manav sensed that Satish may not reveal anything until he was sure of ArMan's marriage,so MAnav urged Archu that they shud meet sulo first

3.) Advice to run away from Mandap: Most foolish decision, considering there is an asthamatic Ma in the house and a father who has just got a heart attack. In the end all the guests were gossiping about Archu's character. If he had told Archu, refuse to Jay for marriage, badnami would be of Jay, not Archu. Now toh Jay has become a victim in the eyes of the Karanjkars and Dharmu.

This is where u r not understanding the episode at all.Imagine Manav's wedding muhurat was going on,wat if he got married at the mandap?wat were archu's chances to get manav back then?>

.How long do u think it wud take Archu to explain to the Ks that jay had diabolic plans,and convince sulo she actually wanted to go and confess to Manav and ask him whether he will marry her instead ? Wat if the muhurat time happened and manav never knew archu wanted him back? she wud have lost the chance of a life time to get her man ! That is where satish's decision to make her run was crucial...also Sulo might have said no to jay if she had known but she wud not have said yes to manav anyway,why shud she,she doesnt feel he is worth her daughter even now.

Satish and Archu knew the badnaami was gonna happen when dulhan disappears..satish cud have explained without archu,but still badnaami exists.

Same goes for manav,he ran away,he left badnaami for his mother and girish when dulha disappeared..why did he not stay back and discuss the decision with his mother and girish?bcoz he wanted archu for himself this time,not only just to 'save' her.

4.) Advice to run away to Manav's mandap without confirming whether Manav was gonna break wedding with shravani: Another foolish decision. He should have told Archu say no to marriage and talk with Manav. The way Archu ran to the mandap saying I want him back, if Shravani had not released Manav, Manav would have refused to marry her and Archu would have got the biggest humiliation of her life in front of all the guests.

She took the same risk Manav took Niki.That is where they were equals in this marriage right?

If Archu had not run,Manav wud have got the worst humiliation of his life,probably Archu wud have not even known that Manav had come to her mandap.Dhammu wud have called the cops or something.Remember,all the Ds except savita wanted Archu.All the Ks except satish hated Manav !

They both took the risk of rejection and humiliation,but decided that they will give themselves a chance to get a spouse of their own choice,this time.

Both decided to stay commited to their respective fiances until last minute,until both got a legitimate reason to leave their fiances.

Both dumped their mothers without explanations,thus did wrong to their mothers.
The episode was perfect.If either ARchu or Manav had forced each other at their respective mandaps,it wud have tarnished both the lead chrs permanently

5.) Till now Satish hasn't revealed that it was he who told Archu to run away, or that Manav is at no fault in this running away business at all. Everyone including Sulo, Dharmu, thinks Manav instigated Archu to run away. This is the root cause of all the problems that ArMan are going through now.

Yes,Satish cud have revealed,but he does not have proof Niki.If he revealed JAy's plans,the chances of catching Jay red-handed when he tries to loot Dhammu and SAtish,wud be nil.He was gonna put Jay on guard.No guarantees that Ks wud believe him.After all,satish,dhammu and jay were gonna be the damaads,it wud be the word of 2 damaads vs 1 then.Somewhere satish chose to play it safe.I see his dilemma here ,thatz all.He knows JAy is a big khiladi

The problem now is,Manav does not measure upto being a caretaker/provider husband.Ks wud have Archu single than married to a pauper it seems.

I really like Satish as a character Saffy. But if you compare him with Manav saying he 'saved' Manav's character, then sorry, I will be prompted to point out his flaws and wrong decisions as well. 😆 Niki I like both Satish and Manav,bcoz both r 'gud' chrs.I defend 'gud' chrs,I never give any sympathy to chrs with vices like selfishness,greed,jealousy etc. that all the other chrs have dominating them.Manav is 'gud' but he was weak.He has inertia coz of which he continued to make same mistakes,he lacks momentum to change his life,no drive,no ambition.Archu is making him have some momentum and ambition,so he is admitting to his mistakes,prime being his disloyalty to Archu during crucial times,which was sulo's question to him on friday's episode.

Saying she is adult,she can take care of herself for a nite,is crap.

Imagine if this scene had been the other way round - savita v ill and alone,and Archu's baby sick.Oh,manav needs to be responsible to his mother,let archu take care of baby somehow,wud have been his decision

Sulo pointed this out correctly when she asked manav the q,and he remembers that q now.

That is why I said,his only problem is that he does not know how handle his mother.The solution was v simple,tell savita he will enter her house only when Archu can come as well.His resurrection is possible only when he stands up to his mother.wife and mother exist in 1 world,he makes them to be mutually exclusive worlds.

In terms of love,ArMan were not equal when it came to loyalty .

Archu did not go back to Manav for a while after SNP,Manav did not take Archu back for a while due to sachin's death.Manav saw satish coming between them and hence agreed to divorce first time for her sake.But archu did not accept satish and remained loyal,defying family,knowingly jeopardizing her future as Manav had no proof of the ajit tape at that point.

Archu saw baby sachu coming between them second time,and hence agreed to divorce second time round for his sake.

But Manav was not loyal,he chose the baby excluding her.This is where Manav's chr went down the drain.

I agree he loves her equally.

Manav confessed to Tarun that he was v lonely and unhappy without Archu during the 1 year period of separation in the first post leap episode..Also remember he did the first Pee Loon VM then,standing in front of her house with sachu😆He is simply a man of few words and subtle body lang,in comparison to Archu,thatz all

Manav signed his life away in jail with disregard to his family just like Archu signed her life away with disregard to her family.