wastage of water by himruta - Page 2

Originally posted by: vibg

I appreciate the spirit in which this topic was made. But we dont need to bring any couple down. Lets leave this job to others. But yes.. For a fair and unbiased space of public discussion, all couples need to b measured with the same yardstick!

i know vibg,even u know that i don't like to post finding fault in others...but there should be limit for every thing if just because upma and rashmi nandini r strong contestants their every move r being critisized like anything esp upma then why should not we point out the fault of himruta when there are plenty of things to point out...

🥱

Originally posted by: Natkat

Yes I totally agree suggestion was being made to open a thread .yes water is so important for mankind. we cannot be without water for even a day. And there is so much scarcity of water around the world and using and wasting water for rehearsals is really tragic. Is money so important and even if it is important why waste water for Rehersals.Anyone can live without chocolate sauce. No one gives a thirsty person chocolate sauce but they need water.himrutha wasting so much water through out rehearsals is bad. They should think of the scarcity before wasting so much water on rehearsals

exactly but i m afraid people may say don't generalize we can survive without water

Why are people discussing the use of water and chocolate in performances for over 2 pages?

In the same light, the entire show uses up a lot of electricity while recording so let's just shut it down.

Originally posted by: HippoSucks

Why are people discussing the use of water and chocolate in performances for over 2 pages?

In the same light, the entire show uses up a lot of electricity while recording so let's just shut it down.

Originally posted by: HippoSucks

Why are people discussing the use of water and chocolate in performances for over 2 pages?

In the same light, the entire show uses up a lot of electricity while recording so let's just shut it down.

Go back.. Chocolate wastage alone was duscussed on multiple topics over pages. 😆

@Hippo.

I dont think wasting food for the name of entertainment is acceptable. Electricity is different, but using choc as prop and having luxury choc bath is just plain gross. Anyways, they got 30 marks and maybe it is because people dont understand that resources should not be used as prop. It is a dance show, and it would be better if people used innovative ideas such as what M and A did for the aerial act.

This is my opinion and of course i can't make people see what i strongly believe is wrong. As for water, two wrongs never make a right. UPMA's actions cant be justified, if in future people started using rice and flour as prop does it make it okay because UPMA used choc?! No.

Originally posted by: E-friend

@Hippo.

I dont think wasting food for the name of entertainment is acceptable. Electricity is different, but using choc as prop and having luxury choc bath is just plain gross. Anyways, they got 30 marks and maybe it is because people dont understand that resources should not be used as prop. It is a dance show, and it would be better if people used innovative ideas such as what M and A did for the aerial act.

This is my opinion and of course i can't make people see what i strongly believe is wrong. As for water, two wrongs never make a right. UPMA's actions cant be justified, if in future people started using rice and flour as prop does it make it okay because UPMA used choc?! No.

Originally posted by: E-friend

@Hippo.

I dont think wasting food for the name of entertainment is acceptable. Electricity is different, but using choc as prop and having luxury choc bath is just plain gross. Anyways, they got 30 marks and maybe it is because people dont understand that resources should not be used as prop. It is a dance show, and it would be better if people used innovative ideas such as what M and A did for the aerial act.

This is my opinion and of course i can't make people see what i strongly believe is wrong. As for water, two wrongs never make a right. UPMA's actions cant be justified, if in future people started using rice and flour as prop does it make it okay because UPMA used choc?! No.

Honestly they can do whatever they want. If they bought the chocolate (which they obviously did) then they can use it however they want. Of course in some cases, there are moral limitations as to what you can do with the things you have paid for (e.g. wasting water while showering is wrong even if you pay for the water). However that barely applies here.

Personally I feel that using chocolate as a prop is not a very good idea. But it is their choice. Using chocolate (and potentially inspiring others to do the same, which is implausible) in a performance is hardly an issue.

@hippo

Of course anyone can do whatever they want in their personal lives but on National TV such acts should not be encouraged to me it is unethical. Moral is subjective and according to me splashing chocolate like this was immoral. Surprised that judges are supporting such immoral acts. .
.

My family have always taught me to respect food as not everyone is fortunate enough to get food and when I see such a performance on National TV, I feel very embarrassed and ashamed of the entertainment industry. UPMA can do whatever they want with food in their personal life but on National TV they should have shown respect to the food. To me such disrespect to the food is outrageous!

@9Tanki,

Knowing how some people idolize their fans and look up to them as role models, I wont be surprised if someone wants to bathe in Luxury Chocolate bath in their personal life because UPMA did it. They should have had some kind of disclaimer on before UPMA's performance.

HIMRUTA's fan can copy them also but at least they will be bathing in water not chocolate. How gross! Why would anyone think choc bathe was an innovate idea. It was a cheap, disgusting theme.