Is the revenge justified? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Rein123

My take is that she doesn't care hence she is the negative/grey naagin for that reason. But till date she hasn't killed any innocent person so won't judge her yet.

Originally posted by: sammy17

I understand why she would consider pratham, the girl (who is yuvi-mahir's sister) and the other joker guy with them to be culprits too as they just stood around during majority of the ordeal not actually trying to stop the boys. But Mahir? I don't get it? Why is he being targeted? Just because his image showed up in vikrant's eyes amongst the killers? Even then that makes no sense as during the entire ordeal neither did ruhi or vikrant see mahir there until after vikrant was shot, plus vikrant had fallen almost half-way down the cliff after being shot before mahir even turned up, so how on earth would have vikrant even got a view of mahir, or am I missing something, like all the boys including mahir looking down the cliff where he had fallen? 😕