Changed stance on Intimacy? MOD Note. Pg. 49 - Page 19

Originally posted by: myownarea

Welcome Aparajita...😃

ur first post on the forum is awesome 😃

Bravo!! Well said!!

I agree,,...nothing innocent there !! Ofcourse people can love it. ITs their choice but I will not accept it if people say it was inncocent yesterday while intimate on nov 5th :)

yeah U wont believe this but M was even bashed for asking his girlfriend to say I love you 🤣

ROFL...so u can imagine the amount of bashing M got for actually getting close to his GF :))

on the question it still remains:)

Divya great topic....I couldnt resist coming back and replying...

First of all I would like to say that my stance on the projection of physical intimacy on Indian Television has always been very strict..I don't enjoy seeing all the random gropping, eye locks, almost kissing, random kissing here and there etc...I find them ridiculous and plain annoying..🤢

I didnt like Pehli baar irrespective of ArTi chemistry and neither do I like Roshni Se...my stance hasn't changed from day one....


Intimacy means opening up...bridging the gap between two personalities....emotional, physical and spiritual....When people get into a relationship they slowly open up to each other...they start exploring each other in all the three above mentioned ways....and all the three aspects are actually interlinked....

For any relationship Physical closeness happens after a certain level of emotional connectivity...for some it happens really fast and some take time....How they did it...where they did it...what turned them on seems pretty inconsequential since it is dependent on the couple itself....

MN and SG are vastly different couples..they had their respective passionate songs...and No one can actually point out hwether one was more or less aesthetic than the other..Cause they are NOT comparable....But If being a part of indian society we want to condemn intimacy before marriage we should condemn both.....If the youth is getting a bad signal from one story they are getting so through the other as well....

I cannot agree with all the debates which are trying to justify that one couple was more justified in what they did, either both were wrong or both were right since the end result is the same...Period !!!

Originally posted by: aparajita.s

hi guys...my first post in da MJHT forum on I-F...I really did not want to be a part of this discussion, becoz i dont want to end up virtually dead on I-F in just one post...🤣

But Ive come across some words which are really confusing me:

Firstly, Pure and Innocent - Well, as far as i can see, yday's sequence can, in no way, be termed "Innocent"... It was passionate, intimate, and also pure, because the feelings of love had evoked them to engage in such a thing (Just like da sequence aired on Mayur) but to term it as innocent? 🤔

Secondly, following the Pehli baar sequence, I had actually read ppl terming M as Out of character for doing wat he did because he is perceived to be a sensible guy, with values and family traditions...If dat was a problem then, how is it now dat emotional bonding justifies the out-of-character act of, well, You-know-who? 😃

I was never against MN intimate scene, and nor am I against SG's, though I obviously hv my own preferences, and liked one better dan the other. but saying something for somebody and forgetting it later on for somebody else....I think dats da whole point of the topic....!!!

Rather than making this a war-zone, why not concentrate on the justification part?😉

Originally posted by: -Rinky-

Divya great topic....I couldnt resist coming back and replying...

First of all I would like to say that my stance on the projection of physical intimacy on Indian Television has always been very strict..I don't enjoy seeing all the random gropping, eye locks, almost kissing, random kissing here and there etc...I find them ridiculous and plain annoying..🤢

I didnt like Pehli baar irrespective of ArTi chemistry and neither do I like Roshni Se...my stance hasn't changed from day one....


Intimacy means opening up...bridging the gap between two personalities....emotional, physical and spiritual....When people get into a relationship they slowly open up to each other...they start exploring each other in all the three above mentioned ways....and all the three aspects are actually interlinked....

For any relationship Physical closeness happens after a certain level of emotional connectivity...for some it happens really fast and some take time....How they did it...where they did it...what turned them on seems pretty inconsequential since it is dependent on the couple itself....

MN and SG are vastly different couples..they had their respective passionate songs...and No one can actually point out hwether one was more or less aesthetic than the other..Cause they are NOT comparable....But If being a part of indian society we want to condemn intimacy before marriage we should condemn both.....If the youth is getting a bad signal from one story they are getting so through the other as well....

I cannot agree with all the debates which are trying to justify that one couple was more justified in what they did, either both were wrong or both were right since the end result is the same...Period !!!

vry vel said.......👏

Originally posted by: -Rinky-

Divya great topic....I couldnt resist coming back and replying...

First of all I would like to say that my stance on the projection of physical intimacy on Indian Television has always been very strict..I don't enjoy seeing all the random gropping, eye locks, almost kissing, random kissing here and there etc...I find them ridiculous and plain annoying..🤢

I didnt like Pehli baar irrespective of ArTi chemistry and neither do I like Roshni Se...my stance hasn't changed from day one....


Intimacy means opening up...bridging the gap between two personalities....emotional, physical and spiritual....When people get into a relationship they slowly open up to each other...they start exploring each other in all the three above mentioned ways....and all the three aspects are actually interlinked....

For any relationship Physical closeness happens after a certain level of emotional connectivity...for some it happens really fast and some take time....How they did it...where they did it...what turned them on seems pretty inconsequential since it is dependent on the couple itself....

MN and SG are vastly different couples..they had their respective passionate songs...and No one can actually point out hwether one was more or less aesthetic than the other..Cause they are NOT comparable....But If being a part of indian society we want to condemn intimacy before marriage we should condemn both.....If the youth is getting a bad signal from one story they are getting so through the other as well....

I cannot agree with all the debates which are trying to justify that one couple was more justified in what they did, either both were wrong or both were right since the end result is the same...Period !!!

Originally posted by: thornewood9

Both were wrong, Yes, but because we are Fans of our respective Jodis we can overlook it😆

Thats what we are missing here!

Its not about whats right for MayUr is wrong for SaJan or vice versa its about trying to see the other Fans viewpoint and applying it to yourself!

I don't like intimacy either on screen it makes me uncomfortable but because Im a SaJan Fan I didnt mind so much. Its all Bias😆 Thats what we are missing, we are missing the point that we are all biased.

Now that we have that cleared up shall we move on?

Adhani and the Towel anyone?

Aisha xxx😉

Originally posted by: thornewood9

Yaar ismein hasney wali baat kya hain? I feel so depressed!😭 I love a Jodi that noone loves! Who can I discuss them with then?😭 I'll tell you who it is. Radhe and Amoli from Bairi Piya😳 But apparently it should be PsychoThakur and Amoli🤢 Thats just Ewwww🤢 And what kind of Yaar are you anyway? Trying to shove me into the Adhani Camp?😆 I'll die but I will NEVER be an Adhani Fan especially after that Twoel Scene😕 Seriously I am SHOCKED😲 that NOONE has found that Scene important enough in its Shocking Nature to comment on!😕

Anyway back on topic:

To be honest I didn't actually notice that Gunjan was wearing a Strap Dress until someone mentioned it here on this Topic😆 And you're right our bias makes us see the scenes in a different way. But what the Creatives did by putting MayUr next to SaJan DID make them seem TOO Passionate. For instance if the MayUr Scene and the SaJan Scene of yesterday were shown in parallel I don't think anyone would be saying one Jodi was more Passionate than the other😃

Aisha xxx😉

guuyyysss im likingg this placee nowwww

a question is the answer of ur question divya!!

Originally posted by: -Rinky-

Divya great topic....I couldnt resist coming back and replying...

First of all I would like to say that my stance on the projection of physical intimacy on Indian Television has always been very strict..I don't enjoy seeing all the random gropping, eye locks, almost kissing, random kissing here and there etc...I find them ridiculous and plain annoying..🤢

I didnt like Pehli baar irrespective of ArTi chemistry and neither do I like Roshni Se...my stance hasn't changed from day one....


Intimacy means opening up...bridging the gap between two personalities....emotional, physical and spiritual....When people get into a relationship they slowly open up to each other...they start exploring each other in all the three above mentioned ways....and all the three aspects are actually interlinked....

For any relationship Physical closeness happens after a certain level of emotional connectivity...for some it happens really fast and some take time....How they did it...where they did it...what turned them on seems pretty inconsequential since it is dependent on the couple itself....

MN and SG are vastly different couples..they had their respective passionate songs...and No one can actually point out hwether one was more or less aesthetic than the other..Cause they are NOT comparable....But If being a part of indian society we want to condemn intimacy before marriage we should condemn both.....If the youth is getting a bad signal from one story they are getting so through the other as well....

I cannot agree with all the debates which are trying to justify that one couple was more justified in what they did, either both were wrong or both were right since the end result is the same...Period !!!