Changed stance on Intimacy? MOD Note. Pg. 49

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

455363

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#381

There is no need for people to scream themselves blue in the face justifying labels that they themselves have put on FICTIONAL characters...MN passionate,intimate therefore insinuating something wrong...SG romantic, innocent, pure implying they were right...OHHHHHHHHHHH PUHLEEZE...MN, SG are normal teenagers with raging hormones, think themselves to be in love and got the opportunity to get really close...where is the need to justify such a basic human need/emotion and create a hullalaboo over it?

Please refer to the pics Jess has posted to get that there was no difference in the pose and therefore the intent of both SG/MN moments...sidestepping her post and still continuing with the romantic innocent pure labeling is not going to help much...

Quote

280200

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#382

Originally posted by: loving_bird

anu u didn't misunderstood the topic.............when this was created we knew that this will cum up as bashing one from both side ........we tried it 2 maintain on what is the basic reason for this topic..........& still trying 2 tell the motive of the topic.............

but sum get iginte on this that why we did this .........but basic motive of this is hard 2 understand by sum people bcoz they might didn't no the past of forum

personally i loved ur all replies i quite happy atleast once it came 2 notice that .........each ones pov is right no one is wrong ..............in future this won't happen what happened in the past

but i will be honest i didn't got one reply from people who were really involved that time

Hey tannvi,

glad that i didnt misunderstood the topic! oh yes, you did! you got a reply from me ! =)

Im very sure people have considered me to the ANTI-MN-Pehli-Baar-scene-list too !! 😆 anyways, I hope my opinion was more or less understandable =)

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Archana

@a-little-hope

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#383

Thanks Taps.....here is what I wrote on intimacy....and feelings behind it.... and the proof with the pics....

Originally posted by: -Jess-

Divya.....what an interesting post...!! You missed the WAR yesterday and you came up with this...? *shakes head*

I have a lot to say about the two intimate...passionate scenes....where to start?... Let me see....

What is intimacy?.... it's physical closeness.....why?....because you feel the urge to express your love to the person your madly and deeply in love with.... and a tender human touch is the most beautiful expression of love.... you express your innermost feelings with passionate kiss or soft caress. Ultimately.... it's the feelings that lead you to physical intimacy that matter. It doesn't matter how one couple expresses their feelings while the other.... if the feelings are pure....then how you express them is upto the couple. And I don't understand why MN's feelings were not PURE and SG's feelings are PURE for the physical closeness... it's PURE nonsense to call one couple's love as cheap and the other's as PURE love. Both the couples are in love and were trying to express their feelings.

Talking about the feelings and understandings....In my opinion love is not all about talking....it not all about giving chocolates and flowers....and big display of your love....it's about making your partner happy with simple things that you do for her....love can be small gestures like cooking dinner for your partner....or filling the petrol in her car and making sure the car doesn't run out off petrol when she is driving... or leaving a breakfast on the table for her when she is taking a shower and you are busy getting ready for office.. or bringing a teekhi bhel to manofy your wife. And I have always seen those simple things between MN... they might not talk a lot like other couple...but they express their love and understanding with small gestures like these....and these simple things makes them my favorite couple. I never fall for the big show off of love.

MN talked during the barn scene... they talked about their dream house... their togetherness... thier little husband wife kids play was a clear picture of their understanding. I remember how SG fans jumped on bashing MN's physical closeness as cheap... I remember we even posted the post about the feelings that lead to that closeness. But people still keep themselves biased with their favorite couple.

See the pics....

If the first is cheap....then the other is cheap too....and if the first is pure...then the other one is pure too...

So my stance of intimacy is that we should not judge other's intimacy...it's their personal thing....and it's upto them how they express it. Fortunately for MN fans AB and RP always present their intimate scenes with decency...and that makes the scenes beautiful......😃

Edited by -Jess- - 15 years ago

Quote

Mahi

@-Mystery-

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 15 years ago

#384

Moderator's Note:
Enough is ENOUGH!

It seems like there's always a reason to argue about whether it's MayUr vs. SaJan, Gunjan vs. Nupur, Samrat vs. Mayank and so on.

This really is enough. I can understand that you can't help liking a jodi or character more than the other, BUT does that mean you have to hate the other???

Do you always have to prove others wrong to prove your fav right? NO!

I'm closing this topic for now till we go through these 50 pages and decide what further action needs to be taken.

Quote

1 ... 35 36 37 38 39

Changed stance on Intimacy? MOD Note. Pg. 49 - Page 39

Related Topics

Explore Topics