Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 7 - Page 71

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Amru I need a small help from u.

Do I keep insulting Draupadi on this forum ?

no

loving someone is not an insult. IDK kab se ho gayya.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Tum likho na please

Ekto main lazybum hu, upar se meri English bohot bekaar hai. I'll try to write agar time mile 👍🏻

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Ekto main lazybum hu, upar se meri English bohot bekaar hai. I'll try to write agar time mile 👍🏻

Ahem.. Ludo King ko bhul mat jana😳🤣

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Ahem.. Ludo King ko bhul mat jana😳🤣

🤣

Originally posted by: Krishnapanchali

Drapaudi brought money that pandavas did not had. It was because marriage to her that pandavas had it in them to stand against their mighty cousin it was because her fathers money that pandavas built Indraprasth. It was panchala army that won then war. And it was she who controlled money bhism himself says at one point that one who controls money controls most of the thing

So know drapaudi did had a lot of power with herself

The point here is that to simply reduced her to a nobody who was just "born for arjuna s sake" is nothing but completely utterly misogynistic and insulting

I am done with all the passive aggressive behaviour against here.

ive never read this in previous 3 EDTs except for here when you brought this up and someone pointed out the there was some Sanskrit citation on quora

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No one can deny that Draupadi's marriage was the first reason why Pandavas could dare to expose themselves to public. Else they would have perished as commoners.

Her dowry helped them built Indraprasth since Dhritrashtra only gave them land not treasury share.

However once given the dowry belonged to the grooms n not the girl herself(, girls only had right on the StreeDhan). Panchali was in charge of the treasury just as Arjun was in charge of the army. In modern day terms she was like the Finance minister of Indraprasth. But neither does it mean that she was the owner of treasury, nor that she had more power than Yudhishtir.

She definitely was better than Yudhishtir or for that matter all the Pandavas in intellect but unfortunately the standards of those days couldn't give justice to her intellect

In fact after the war, Yudhishtir actually took the Financial ministry from her. He was a complete bigot

I completely agree with this

why did he do that though n how come draupadi dint protest. or she was not interested anymore

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I want a scene between Karna Duryodhan and Vikarna during the night of DyutSabha.

Something like

Vikarna hesitant about approaching Duryodhan since he thinks that Dury would be angry at him for opposing them in public court.

Karna actually scolding Vikarna for his acts and Vikarna expecting the same for Dury. And later Dury saying that when Karna has already scolded him as an elder brother there is no need for him to repeat the act. And although he didn't like Vikarna opposing him yet he can never get angry at his brothers

Alas no one will show this ever

@Naq any inputs

Panchali's swag..

https://www.instagram.com/p/CC5AYFynTM8/?igshid=1foexeha9ifhd

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Panchali's swag..

https://www.instagram.com/p/CC5AYFynTM8/?igshid=1foexeha9ifhd

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

@Naq any inputs

well there would have been some discussion among vikarna n dury after dyut sabha. Dury was quite egoistic though wonder if he would have let go the opposition so easily