Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 10/ DT's Nt pg 121

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Arijit

@Arijit007

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#861

Originally posted by: -Shani-

Has it even got mentioned in this show so far that Krishna will be Parthasaarthi?😕

nope, but mention toh karenge kal.

Quote

bheegi

@bheegi

Stunner

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

#862

Originally posted by: Arijit007
dekhte hain kyaa dikhaate hain, geetaa gyaan toh avashyaa dekhaayenge, agar nahi dikhayaa toh avashya sarvanaash hogaa cv's kaa.

The new tweet from SP shows Dury, Krishna and Arjun on the picture. That's why I'm hoping we will have Gita gyan for sure

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Srishti

@srishtisingh

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#863

wow I missed episode, came to get update and I am getting live mahabharat! 😛

Quote

Arijit

@Arijit007

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

#864

Originally posted by: srishtisingh
wow I missed episode, came to get update and I am getting live mahabharat! 😛

make that karnabharat.

Quote

Archana

@-Archu-

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#865

⭐️ Vasudev has named the war as "MAHABHARAT"!!!

Or is it really like that,the name of the epic came from the name of the war...I heard the name "Kurukshetra war"only...

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#866

Originally posted by: bheegi

@Leadnitrate...I'd like to believe your theory as I feel Dury's bad deeds did indeed outshine his good deeds.😊

"one earth yr cannot be compared to one yr in heaven or hell.
balram's sasur ji spent one danda in brahmalok , only to come back and find two chaturyugas gone by, third is almost edging towards kali, dwapar almost towards end and the only man fit enough for his revati is Kanha's brother balram

Duri was still finishing up his qouta in swarg"

not sure yaar the way its explained in KMG seems like dury and co are here to stay when yudi meets them in heaven

here is what god's say to explain dury's presence doesn't seem like they want to send him to hell

"Narada, smiling, told him, It should not be so, O king of kings. While residing in Heaven, all enmities cease. O mighty-armed Yudhishthira, do not say so about king Duryodhana. Hear my words. Here is king Duryodhana. He is worshipped with the gods by those righteous men and those foremost of kings who are now denizens of Heaven. By causing his body to be poured as a libation on the fire of battle, he has obtained the end that consists in attainment of the region for heroes. You and your brothers, who were veritable gods on Earth, were always persecuted by this one. Yet through his observance of Kshatriya practices he has attained to this region. This lord of Earth was not terrified in a situation fraught with terror."O son, thou shouldst not bear in mind the woes inflicted on thee on account of the match at dice. It behoveth thee not to remember the afflictions of Draupadi. It behoveth thee not to remember the other woes which were yours in consequence of the acts of your kinsmen,"the woes, viz., that were due to battle or to other situations. Do thou meet Duryodhana now according to the ordinances of polite intercourse. This is Heaven, O lord of men. There can be no enmities here.'

this is what vishamapyana also latter tells janmejaya

Slain on the field of battle, O foremost of men, Karna entered Surya. Shakuni obtained absorption into Dwapara, and Dhrishtadyumna into the deity of fire. The sons of Dhritarashtra were all Rakshasas of fierce might. Sanctified by death caused by weapons, those high-souled beings of prosperity all succeeded in attaining to Heaven

Quote

smrth

@smrth

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#867

Amazing defence of a pretender! That too, of a most distorted one in this soon to be over project- Inevitably selective, stretched out and illogical.🤢 No time to toil over each, but one key point, would like to highlight some tell-telling myths; Anga Pradesh! A most eulogised gift which started a defining friendship/loyalty/bondage or whatever...

How is it generally perceived? Or even held as a good sticker (and convenient to his 'contest-greatness' agenda) by Karna himself?...That, he was spontaneously supported and upheld by Dury. A bighearted largesse by a prince to an unknown commoner. Was it all there that meets the eyes? some facts...

# 1) The first facade- 'they were unknown to each other'. Whoa, they were good cohorts from much earlier- practicing assassination skills as school projects. So whom were they fooling?? In Rangbhoomi- Here went Dury down flat and there came our Hero in shining armour- stalling what was basically a clan's private completion. And just when protocol officer Krupa raises technical objection, out comes Anga Pradesh!! From the personal coffer of Dury!!??🤢

# 2) But was it his personal fief? For that matter, his father's? What did Anga belong to?- The state of Hastinapur. So how does a prince- not even a designate crown prince yet- cleave a stae without asking anyone? And what was Dury achieving by it? Was he giving it up? Or rather ensuring his personal clout on this territory tr a personal confidante? (#1).. I am amazed at the fact that no one even questioned this donation! Not Bhishma, nor Vidur. And the Pandavs?! They were too decent to object and contest this largesse!

# 3) And if conniving Dhritrashtra quickly complied the transfer, then to whom should new legate's loyalty lay? To the pilferer or to the state from which his fiefdom came? Why only Dury? Because he writ a forgery for him? 😕

# 4) Before someone rebukes me with 'a king's right to approve or disapprove'- let us remember Dhrit's legal status- A trustee king not an outright sovereign. But even with this, something was intriguing. Hastinapur and Anga were distant districts. One in North, other in east. Separated by numerous independent states. So who annexed it to HP? Who secured it for HP? No- not Bhishma. And certainly not Dhritrashtra. It was PANDU, who had won eastern provinces!😲 It was his campaign which saw eastern expansion!! Then, to whom should it legitimately go? To his sons or to Dhritrashtra's?!? So much for the pretensions of 'indebtedness'...

(above facts can be verified with KMG.)

Quote

Archana

@-Archu-

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#868

Originally posted by: Arijit007
make that karnabharat.

Bhrata Arijit ,It was Krishnabharat for a week or more and Karna was not visible anywhere in HP for a long period So let him enjoy the new found lime light...😳

Quote

TheWatcher

@TheWatcher

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#869

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

i dont remeber the karna part will need to check but from what i remember there are differences but not any major ones i was saying mainly from the POV of this serial that its not like if we use RM, characters will suddenly seem something different from KMG or this serial will suddenly feel right or not distorted .Major incidents are not something completely different from KMG .No matter which translation one uses this serial will remain highly distorted .

The Karna part is there in KMG but minus the emotions, Karna fighting with a ' smile', shooting arrows ' mildy' while Bheem was shooting arrows fiercely is mentioned in KMG but only to a certain extent.

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#870

Originally posted by: TheWatcher

The Karna part is there in KMG but minus the emotions, Karna fighting with a ' smile', shooting arrows ' mildy' while Bheem was shooting arrows fiercely is mentioned in KMG but only to a certain extent.

WOW i have never noticed this thanks for sharing.If this is the case then if writer's while writing their translations assume karna was slightly emotional while fighting his brother's aren't completely wrong

Quote

1 ... 85 86 87 88 89 ... 118

Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 10/ DT's Nt pg 121 - Page 87

Related Topics

Explore Topics