Mahabharat Episode Discussion Thread # 10/ DT's Nt pg 121 - Page 88

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

94k

Users

53

Likes

4k

Frequent Posters

Arijit007 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
sab us sutputra sorry suryaputra ko le ke busy hain, par sabhi ko yeh nahi dekhaa ke sab se badaa distortion karna aur duryodhan ki mitrata kaa dhajjiyaa ud jaanaa nahi, woh yeh hain ke krishna arjun ke rath main nahi hain.
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Sabhayata


WOW i have never noticed this thanks for sharing.If this is the case then if writer's while writing their translations assume karna was slightly emotional while fighting his brother's aren't completely wrong


I see, so RM retelling is not just some random author writing what he thought VV and others thought???

So why was his book dismissed and judged upon again?

Justitia thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Arijit007

sab us sutputra sorry suryaputra ko le ke busy hain, par sabhi ko yeh nahi dekhaa ke sab se badaa distortion karna aur duryodhan ki mitrata kaa dhajjiyaa ud jaanaa nahi, woh yeh hain ke krishna arjun ke rath main nahi hain.

Bhrata, aur kyaa saare Pandav ke dhwaj pe Hanuman ji the?

Aaj ke episode ko dekhkar aisa hi lag rahaa tha...😕
TheWatcher thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
Not completely wrong but showing Karna dwelling in tears will be going too far, this is where Creative liberties comes into action.

Karna obviously did not fight with Bheem with his whole might, he knew he was his brother and moreover he promised his mother too, dilemma was obviously there from Karna's side. Karna never fired any celestial weapon at Bhima, and this has been mentioned in the epic as well, 'BY THE ORDINARY MEANS OF HUMAN BATTLE" has been used quite a number of times for Karna vs Bhima battle.
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Arijit007

sab us sutputra sorry suryaputra ko le ke busy hain, par sabhi ko yeh nahi dekhaa ke sab se badaa distortion karna aur duryodhan ki mitrata kaa dhajjiyaa ud jaanaa nahi, woh yeh hain ke krishna arjun ke rath main nahi hain.


oh so sorry arijit actually you are right its time to move on karna's story is over for now in SB

ya it was weird not to see krishna ji on arjuna's rath but i am sure it will happen its to big a deal to skip

about the episode best part was krishna ji explaining the significance of kurushetra.Also liked karna's expressions when he saw his brother's for the first time

but what dont understand is why is dhrishtdyumna not the senpati and even before the war everyone knows how to defeat bheeshma seems like ⭐️bheeshma wont even fight for a day since they will get shikhandini infront of him on the first day itself.Not sure what writer's are trying to do here
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

But it was not, just some random creative piece of work as was claimed, judged a few pages back and then casually dismissed as a POI or Mrityunjay?

not to mention, people who chose to quote from RM or chose it as a translation of MB were ridiculed and their understanding was questioned.

Edited by LeadNitrate - 11 years ago
Arijit007 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
don't worry, they won't figure out how to put shikhandini infront of bhishma before the time bhisma's fall, as he will be protected by the kuru maharathi's.
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: LeadNitrate


I see, so RM retelling is not just some random author writing what he thought VV and others thought???

So why was his book dismissed and judged upon again?


what i meant was both RM and Jaya mention karna's emotions while fighting his brother's .RM one like cots mentioned is happy seeing Bhima win whereas jaya mentions that every time karna saw his brother's he felt like hugging them.What i meant was these interpretations of the writers have some basis in KMG as well
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Arijit007

don't worry, they won't figure out how to put shikhandini infront of bhishma before the time bhisma's fall, as he will be protected by the kuru maharathi's.


ya i hope there is a twist in the tale besides shikhandini has to become shikhandin as well
Justitia thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Sabhayata


but what dont understand is why is dhrishtdyumna not the senpati and even before the war everyone knows how to defeat bheeshma seems like ⭐️bheeshma wont even fight for a day since they will get shikhandini infront of him on the first day itself.Not sure what writer's are trying to do here

This might be the reason for the objection over Shikhandini's participation in the war as the precap methinks...

Kaurava side might say "women not allowed", and THAT might be the reason for the sex change.

And Bhishma, of course, will consider the "male" to be "female" and not fight...but I'm not sure how even ⭐️Bhishma will last for 10 days of the war even due to this. I mean, Bhishma's fall can be achieved on the first day itself even after the sex change...

Or maybe, Shikhandi(ni) might be "kept away" for the first 9 days, and brought to fight only on day 10...
Let's see what ⭐️B comes up with...

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".