Arjuna said he can't marry Subhadra ???/ DT's Nt pg 9 - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

106

Views

16.3k

Users

28

Likes

554

Frequent Posters

AnjanaYYZ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#61
I really felt for StarSubhi today. She was so Chiper and on Cloud 11 - All HAPPY . Starjuna is like let's get this done so I can go home to IP🤣🤣 More concerned about Mamashri, Draupadi, Maatashri, and Jhesti ki Rajsui.
daenerysnow thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: simplysappie


Another feather to their crap :
starArjuna is too shy to get married to a girl ..
starDraupadi is way too bechari to be draupadi . She alone can eradicate water scarcity from our nation , save a million lives n help India ..
starSubhadra is a despo who wants to be with stararjuna at any cost n resembles a typical bollywood supporting actress ...


I find Draupadis depiction utterly deficient, what's with all the indulgent self-pity n weeping with her n kunti, she should save up the tears for when theres cause for it, the dice game. I had high hopes for her role but its just fizzled out, losing its initial mystique n like most of the females roles, fated to cry endlessly about this that n the other. There's no sense of dignity in this Draupadi.honestly. Subhadra n Arjun have switched roles as it appears, she is besotted by him n fixed upon abducting him, as opposed to being abducted by him, what's with this strange desire to emasculate Arjuna, first showing him as brihannala so early n Krishna uniting the two, Subhadra laying claim on him while he watches the show and half heartedly accepts. come on, he's married uloopi who wanted him n chitraganda whom he became attracted to already I think he's @ a far enough stage to take the reins on this matter of procuring another wife who he desired from the first instance. This serial blows in terms of sanitizing the pandavas as if they were free from lust desire for women, when they saw Draupadi they had all felt a desire for her, instead they show the reluctance of marrying her who was of celestial beauty, the one who stirred desire in mens hearts.
simplysappie thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#63

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

agreed
today StarArjuna's expressions were such 'Ki mein yeh kahan phas gaya,madhav ke liye kya kya karne padta hain'
StarSubhi hain jiski smile ruk nahin rahi this and StarArjuna hai jisko smile aa nahi rahi thi.
Sorry real Subhadra

Yaaa , aur itna chid lag ra tha uss tym pe na mere ko .. Ekdum diagonally opposite kar diya story ko ...
simplysappie thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: rangeeni


I find Draupadis depiction utterly deficient, what's with all the indulgent self-pity n weeping with her n kunti, she should save up the tears for when theres cause for it, the dice game. I had high hopes for her role but its just fizzled out, losing its initial mystique n like most of the females roles, fated to cry endlessly about this that n the other. There's no sense of dignity in this Draupadi.honestly. Subhadra n Arjun have switched roles as it appears, she is besotted by him n fixed upon abducting him, as opposed to being abducted by him, what's with this strange desire to emasculate Arjuna, first showing him as brihannala so early n Krishna uniting the two, Subhadra laying claim on him while he watches the show and half heartedly accepts. come on, he's married uloopi who wanted him n chitraganda whom he became attracted to already I think he's @ a far enough stage to take the reins on this matter of procuring another wife who he desired from the first instance. This serial blows in terms of sanitizing the pandavas as if they were free from lust desire for women, when they saw Draupadi they had all felt a desire for her, instead they show the reluctance of marrying her who was of celestial beauty, the one who stirred desire in mens hearts.

I agree with every word of yours Rangeeni di . I think for starbharat maker only two colours exist white n black . In their bid to potray pandavas as white they've ended up downplaying them ..
RosChel.Lobster thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#65

Originally posted by: simplysappie

I'm sorry if its offending but i seriously doubt if StarArjuna is straight ???😆😆

u better watch on ur words before commenting sappy. ..there's really no need to go overboard to express ur angst...pick ur words carefully from here on...n u better not nly b sorry for offending Arjun fans but u also edit ur comment!!!
Regina_Lupa thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#66

Originally posted by: simplysappie

Haan , waise aapke andar sahadev ki aatma aa gyi thi kya ???


looks like tht!!!!!!
par meri poorvaabhaas sahdev ki tarah weak nehi hai!!!!
hamesha sach nikhltha hai!!!!
mnx12 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#67
Note:
Hello guys,
Using StarArjun, StarDrau, some times is ok, but over doing it is not allowed. Being sarcastic some times to express your displeasure should not become a habbit, that all your comments are seen as making fun of this show.
Criticizing characters is ok, but snide humiliating remarks against characters are not allowed.
You may not like it but others do watch these characters as an epic ones. Keep these pts in mind while commenting.

Mahabharat DT
Edited by mnx12 - 11 years ago
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#68
Minakshi

Using the prefix 'Star' is not necessarily sarcastic: it's meant to emphasize the difference b/w the original epic character vs the one shown in the serial. The use of original names like Arjun, Subhadra, Krishna, Draupadi is usually reserved for the epic originals, and the prefix 'Star' is used for this serial's inventions.

e.g. Arjun abducted Subhadra, married her in Dwarka and accompanied by the Yadavas, returned to Indraprastha. Subhadra took the robes of a milkmaid on Arjun's advice, and was warmly welcomed by Kunti, & then Draupadi. Kauravas/Hastinapur didn't come into the picture AT ALL

⭐️Arjun refused to marry ⭐️Subhadra, then married her, then showed up @ the mandap where ⭐️Duryodhan was waiting. ⭐️Kunti was horrified to see ⭐️Subhadra w/ ⭐️Arjun. ⭐️Dhritarashtra was furious, and ⭐️Krishna pointed out that he'd either have to declare Indraprastha independent if he wanted to attack Dwarka, or accept this marriage. ⭐️Dhritarashtra blessed ⭐️Arjun and ⭐️Subhadra, but ⭐️Bheeshma refused to. ⭐️Krishna & ⭐️Bheeshma then had an argument.

As you can see, the latter paragraph above wasn't an attempt @ sarcasm: it was seriously emphasizing that the characters of this show did things that were just not there in the original. Dhritarashra probably never met Subhadra until after the war: he certainly wasn't there @ her marriage. Neither was Bheeshma. The original Bheeshma would never have gotten involved in such a marriage context b/w his grandnephews
Edited by .Vrish. - 11 years ago
Justitia thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#69

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Minakshi

Using the prefix 'Star' is not necessarily sarcastic: it's meant to emphasize the difference b/w the original epic character vs the one shown in the serial. The use of original names like Arjun, Subhadra, Krishna, Draupadi is usually reserved for the epic originals, and the prefix 'Star' is used for this serial's inventions.

e.g. Arjun abducted Subhadra, married her in Dwarka and accompanied by the Yadavas, returned to Indraprastha. Subhadra took the robes of a milkmaid on Arjun's advice, and was warmly welcomed by Kunti, & then Draupadi. Kauravas/Hastinapur didn't come into the picture AT ALL

⭐️Arjun refused to marry ⭐️Subhadra, then married her, then showed up @ the mandap where ⭐️Duryodhan was waiting. ⭐️Kunti was horrified to see ⭐️Subhadra w/ ⭐️Arjun. ⭐️Dhritarashtra was furious, and ⭐️Krishna pointed out that he'd either have to declare Indraprastha independent if he wanted to attack Dwarka, or accept this marriage. ⭐️Dhritarashtra blessed ⭐️Arjun and ⭐️Subhadra, but ⭐️Bheeshma refused to. ⭐️Krishna & ⭐️Bheeshma then had an argument.

As you can see, the latter paragraph above wasn't an attempt @ sarcasm: it was seriously emphasizing that the characters of this show did things that were just not there in the original. Dhritarashra probably never met Subhadra until after the war: he certainly wasn't there @ her marriage. Neither was Bheeshma. The original Bheeshma would never have gotten involved in such a marriage context b/w his grandnephews


Completely agree.

How else are we supposed to distinguish between Vyasa's characters and their respective Star⭐️ Plus counterparts? Not everything is necessarily sarcasm.
Edited by shani88 - 11 years ago
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#70
I think Minakshi's points on Star+Names and Sarcasm are independant of each other.. Minaxi.. Star+Names are used only be clear on which story we are discussing and also to assure that complaints if any are on the show's character.. not on the epic character or the show's actor as these three are always found to be confused with each other..
Do let us know when you think it is overdone..

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".