WHY THE SILENCE, DRAUPADI??

bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
I must confess i was very miffed earlier at the repeated , inconsistent tamperings of the story in "starbharat/stararjuna" in name of creative license.
but the one distortion i was very happy to be shown was the speaking out of draupadi against the outcome of the discussions on kunti's order and her subsequent bartering in the name of marriage. even the brc mahabharat showed the draupadi silent in those events.

I have always found it unpalatable that draupadi is silent when the most momentous decision about her life is being taken, the decision which is so shocking, unconventional and probably a sin in the eyes of the world! The assertive, eloquent, Draupadi, who in her swayamvara spoke with such finality that she shall not wed a suta , doesnt say anything here.

I have always wondered why?

Yudhishthir and the twins had got up from the swayamvara hall soon after Arjun won her , and left for their house which they had reached long before arjun and bhim came with draupadi. It is highly unlikely that Yudhishthira hadn't given the news of Arjuna winning Draupadi to his mother. It was such important news, they had come to Kampilya specifically for this purpose,on learning of it from brahmanas , the whole Kamplilya was celebrating her swayamvara on that day, even strangers could have talked about nothing else on that day.

Was Kunti was really worried about her words turning out to be a lie' here? It is not an oath she has taken, it is not a vow, and sometimes even a lie is superior to the truth - (satyat jyeyo'nrtam vachah) - here its a question of a women's virtue!!

At this stage, says the Mahabharata, all the Pandava brothers looked at Draupadi and they all lusted so strongly for her that their senses ceased to function. Yudhishthira makes up his mind now - for, apart from seeing the lust in the eyes of his brothers and knowing his own desire for her, he also remembered what Vyasa had told them: that the princess of Panchala was destined to be their common bride.He announces his decision now - all the five brothers together shall marry her. She shall be their common wife.

Yudhishthira's solution must have been a complete shock to her. This was unheard of. A man marrying many women was common. But this - this was outrageous!She must have been utterly taken aback by what had just been spoken. This should have made her speak. Made her protest. Made her scream. But she does not scream. She does not protest. She does not speak a word.

But now all will say it was destined.She herself asked for such a boon from Lord Shiva. Even if we are willing to believe the story of Draupadi's past birth in which she was given the boon or curse of five husbands, against which she protests immediately (to Shiva himself- is it a curse or a boon?), Draupadi had no knowledge of it in this life. She has as yet no knowledge of the other stories Vyasa would later tell Drupada (in private) justifying her marriage to the five Pandavas.

In those times' patriarchial society, a decision of five men to marry her simultaneously is not accepted without protests - violent protests. But Draupadi - the fearless ksatrani, born of fire, - remains silent. Utterly silent. And remains so in all other versions of Mahabharat too.

Perhaps the CVs of Mahabharat , while looking through a 21st century lens into that epic times , are finally asking the relevant and pertinant questions to the bhiksha/dan episode which always makes us cringe.

Created

Last reply

Replies

29

Views

3.6k

Users

8

Likes

57

Frequent Posters

bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Grrr... these CVs just had to burst my bubble na?😡

Here i was complimenting them for letting draupadi speak out and then they throw the bombshell of draupadi herself suggesting the marriage leaching away any blame to the brothers or the mother!!! 😡



Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#3
The root cause of all the blame of Draupadi's sufferings have already been transferred to poor Drupada, so that's where that goes.

Yeah, Draupadi's silence made more sense than actually herself suggesting that she marry everybody 😆
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#4
Agreed that is a serious problem.. Vyas said Draupadi is ready for the sacrifice so Pandavas should not hesitate.. It is ok for her to decide that but counting CVs interest in making a 21st century show this only makes things more weird for them..
something that would support CVs is that Draupadi did not complaint on the arrangement and also that she slept at their foot gladly..
bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

The root cause of all the blame of Draupadi's sufferings have already been transferred to poor Drupada, so that's where that goes.

that was when i stopped writing any posts on story distortion. it was very OTT.

Yeah, Draupadi's silence made more sense than actually herself suggesting that she marry everybody 😆



if they wanted to show her taking the decision (thanks to Krishna and his stones), they could have shown it in a different way keeping the original story intact. like kunti asking for alternatives and yudi suggesting examples of jatila etc, OR vyasa reminding her the boon from shiva , then draupadi accepting resignedly and saying she will marry all five.

p.s. leaving aside this show, do u really think that draupadi's silent acceptance of this marriage makes sense in the scriptures? i personally feel her protests have been left out to portray pandavas and kunti in a better light.


bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Agreed that is a serious problem.. Vyas said Draupadi is ready for the sacrifice so Pandavas should not hesitate.. It is ok for her to decide that but counting CVs interest in making a 21st century show this only makes things more weird for them..

something that would support CVs is that Draupadi did not complaint on the arrangement and also that she slept at their foot gladly..




quite a pardox.
but whether a 21st century or dwapar yuga show, in neither one would have draupadi suggested this arrangement herself.
a 21st century woman would have demanded kunti to retract her words and a dwapar era woman would be too constrained(under then prevailing social norms) for any thoughts of polyandry.
Edited by bhas1066 - 11 years ago
_vash_ thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#7

I think portrayal of Draupadi is bit confusing and contradiction in itself 🤔. Cvs are confusing us.. in some part she tells she is not bothered about caste (which is starbharat's creation) and but in her swayumwar she says she won't marry Karna because he is suthputra. And after raising her voice against Kunti and Arjun now she herself is willing to marry all 5 pandavas and according to this serial she isn't even aware of Shivji's boon, they didn't even bother to show it till now.

The way she is been shown like a 21st century women it is really nice to see but one cannot accept her because Mahabharat didn't happen in 21st century. So we have to accept the fact that Draupadi was silent every time some one else made crucial decision for her. I really don't know how they are going to interpret vastraharan considering startbharat's Draupadi is quite a rebellion in every sense... how will she even let that happen to her? 😕
Edited by _vash_ - 11 years ago
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: bhas1066

quite a pardox.
but whether a 21st century or dwapar yuga show, in neither one would have draupadi suggested this arrangement herself.
a 21st century woman would have demanded kunti to retract her words and a dwapar era woman would be too constrained(under then prevailing social norms) for any thoughts of polyandry.


I dint mean that.. was saying for 21st century audience, basing such a huge decision on 5 stones is really illogical.. if they think we wont accept previous birth stories or mothers order then how are we expected to accept this lame logic 🤢
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#9
Vash

For us becoming an Amba or staying unmarried forever would sound more logical and better than getting married to 5 men isn't it? so why attempting to tweek the logics when they are not sure how to do it?

And about contradiction, remember she said she had put varmala on Arjun's neck without knowing his Kul Gotra and not being bothered about her bhavishya.. we know what happened earlier and just the previous episode she told Arjun and Bhima that she knew that it was them..
_vash_ thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: ...Diala...

Vash


For us becoming an Amba or staying unmarried forever would sound more logical and better than getting married to 5 men isn't it? so why attempting to tweek the logics when they are not sure how to do it?

And about contradiction, remember she said she had put varmala on Arjun's neck without knowing his Kul Gotra and not being bothered about her bhavishya.. we know what happened earlier and just the previous episode she told Arjun and Bhima that she knew that it was them..

Absolutely Diala, I agree 😊 !! why they are showing things to justify Mahabharata itself because so many people know this story and have accepted the fact that Draupadi is married to all pandavas. why are they searching for logics giving illogical reasons when we people are ready to accept that fact. Like yesterdays in the episode someone asked not sure who about 'what if in future a woman marrying 5 men will be taken for granted.' I mean why was that dialogue even necessary I am unable to understand. Ouch

@Bold: That was a slapstick 😆😆😆😆 on CV's chracterisation of Draupadi I think its gone beyond distortion. I am afraid they are not even referring to the dialogues they themselves have written or shown in previous episode.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".