Suryadeva, Rishi Durvasa and abandonment - what should they have done? - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

166

Views

14k

Users

25

Likes

413

Frequent Posters

Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#41
Anjana, your take on kuntis decision to not tell kauravas and pandavas about karna is interesting.
Edited by medha00 - 11 years ago
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#42
Please do refrain from posting personal opinions on who did/did not deserve the thrown or pandavas relationship with king pandu.It can start another fan war since people have various opinions on these subjects.
There are other threads opened for these topics.
Keep in mind the religious sentiments while discussing Lord Krishna.
Thanks
AnjanaYYZ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#43
@Medha - thanks for the reminder. Will leave on that note.

My last thought - Returning to your original question - I don't think there was more that Suryadev could have done. As for Durvasa - if he had warned Kunti then there would be no Karna. How was he to know what Kunti did with the mantra?
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

@Medha - thanks for the reminder. Will leave on that note.

My last thought - Returning to your original question - I don't think there was more that Suryadev could have done. As for Durvasa - if he had warned Kunti then there would be no Karna. How was he to know what Kunti did with the mantra?


Perhaps, chose another family for him and get rid of the caste problem, in the first place.
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#45

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ


At the first point - during the contest. If she told the Pandavas... the Pandavas would have want to rectify the injustice. Leading to greater injustice. As their parentage would have been impugned and maligned. Already Dury used to taunt whether or not they were really Pandu's sons. So, imagine Kunti adding full gasoline to that theory by declaring Karna her son with Suryadev😲

Thereafter there was always possibility that if she tried to reunite her six sons then Karna would give everything to Dury in the name of friendship.

So why go to him on the cusp of the war? Because there it was a matter of life. Life trumps Property. It was her only chance to save the lives of all six. And if not six then five - which is what Karna not Kunti decided. And he further decided not to emotionally weaken either Dury or the Pandavas by revealing the truth to either side. Because it would have been unfair and adharma for the Pandavas to surrender to Dury and injustice to his friendship to Dury for him to abandon Dury.

As for Yudi cursing mommy and saying the war could have been avoided... he wasn't listening to Geeta! And in grief didn't realize what Karna knew - that the war of K was needed and unavoidable.

See my friend ..there are always different perspective to look at things.. You feel she feared @bold , I feel she was scared about society.. and it was just a possibility that you said that karna wud have given everything to dury...i feel there was a possibility that pandavas cud have got their share because of karna..who knows he might have convinced dury..
Yes war was unavoidable and thus evryone's mistake took it to that level where destruction was bound to happen...
My only grudge against kunti is - when she parts away from karna...She reminds him or rather blessed him to keep his promise intact... I feel she was immune to what was going to happen to her 6th one... and had concerned only for 5 of her children.
Anyways I always respect difference of opinion ..So calling off this debate from my end...
Nice topic n nice discussion..
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ


At the first point - during the contest. If she told the Pandavas... the Pandavas would have want to rectify the injustice. Leading to greater injustice. As their parentage would have been impugned and maligned. Already Dury used to taunt whether or not they were really Pandu's sons. So, imagine Kunti adding full gasoline to that theory by declaring Karna her son with Suryadev😲


though out of topic, to clarify, all the world did know that the Pandavas were not biological sons of Pandu.. it is said that many Rishis came to Hastinapur when the Kids and Kunti were brought there and confirmed this which the society readily accepted.. so revealing Karna's identity would not be gasoline to the theory anyway..

Pandu not being the bio father of the sons, Durvasa's boon and Gods being their fathers being known to all, what difference that makes if Kunti was married or a maiden when the son was born?
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: varaali


Apart from not being allowed to contest for Drauapdi's hand, in what did Karna's adopted parentage prove a hindrance?

None. IMO

Dury and Karna's friendship started long before the Rangabhoomi episode. I don't buy this argument that Karna was 'obliged' to Dury because the latter saved his honour.
Karna was only prevented from participating in the Rangabhoomi because it was only for the Kuru princes. We don't find the Avanti princes, the Kashi princes taking part in the rangabhoomi function.

Okay, as a Pandav or a Kaunteya Karna could have participated in the Rangabhoomi- but by not being allowed to participate how did he suffer?


@underlined: I too dont agree with the argument that he saved his honour that day.. Actually he did give him a better status than what was entitled to a Suta.. this does sound a very valid act for Karna to be obliged to Duryodhan..

@bold: They did not participate in the ranghbhoomi function 1)because they were not part of the audience 2)they really were not annoyed since childhood about Arjuna getting the 'best archer title'

if Karna is blamed for being jealous of Arjuna then will have to discuss someone else also which will be too much deviation from the topic.. though I know it is already done 😆
bhas1066 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#48
hello
I wanted to add my two cents to this discussion:
i see many people here telling that durvasa should have warned or explained to kunti etc , but durvasa did mention to kunti that the mantra is for getting children from gods. If thats not self-explanatory as well a warning, i dont what else is? It is extremely stupid for a teenage girl of that time to dare to test the efficacy of such a mantra without seeking the council of any elders.

The Mahabharata, Book 1: Adi Parva: Sambhava Parva: Section LXVII
:
And Pritha with all possible care gratified the wrathful Rishi with soul under complete control. The holy one, gratified with the attentions bestowed on him by the maiden, told her, 'I am satisfied, O fortunate one, with thee! By this mantra (that I am about to give thee), thou shall be able to summon (to thy side) whatever celestials thou likest. And, by their grace, shall thou also obtain children.' Thus addressed, the girl (a little while
after), seized with curiosity, summoned, during the period of her maiden-hood, the god Surya.

Also kunti knew before the rangbhoomi event about the whereabouts of karna through her spies. She just saw him there for the first time.

The Mahabharata, Book 3: Vana Parva: Pativrata-mahatmya Parva: Section CCCVII :
And Pritha learnt through spies that her own son clad in celestial mail was growing up amongst the Angas as the eldest son of a charioteer (Adhiratha).



Edited by bhas1066 - 11 years ago
varaali thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#49

Originally posted by: ...Diala...


@underlined: I too dont agree with the argument that he saved his honour that day.. Actually he did give him a better status than what was entitled to a Suta.. this does sound a very valid act for Karna to be obliged to Duryodhan..

@bold: They did not participate in the ranghbhoomi function 1)because they were not part of the audience 2)they really were not annoyed since childhood about Arjuna getting the 'best archer title'

if Karna is blamed for being jealous of Arjuna then will have to discuss someone else also which will be too much deviation from the topic.. though I know it is already done 😆


@ blue : So according to you, Sutas - Karna included - were dependent on the 'higher castes' for their survival?

And what do you mean by ' better status than was entitled to a Suta..."

Please read the very first adhyaay from Srimad Bhagavataham to know how much respect Ugrasriva got from Brahmins.

The whole business of "Sutas- lower caste - oppressed" is vote bank politics permeated by serial makers.

As I have said earlier, the only restriction on Sutas was on their marriage - not anywhere else. And even here we find exceptions. Queen Sudhishina- wife of Raja Virata was a Suta herself.

@ red: I didn't understand you point here. I said that the Avanti princes, the Kashi princes etc, despite being part of Drona's gurukulam did not participate in the rangabhoomi b'cos it was meant only for Kuru princes- not outsiders. Karna was not a Kuru prince and he had no business being therein the first place.

In any case I am retiring from this discussion.


Edited by varaali - 11 years ago
Medha.S thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#50

Originally posted by: JanakiRaghunath

Wonderful post! Kunti was a flawed character like others in the Mahabharat, but she was not solely responsible for the abandonment of Karna. It's just that people are quick to judge women and blame them, even if others are involved in the case.

Kunti sitting quiet and letting Karna be insulted by everyone as Suta putra was wrong, yes, but he was also Surya Dev's son. Why didn't Surya Dev do anything to restore his son's respect? If Surya Dev, a God, sat quiet, then how can we fault a simple human woman, when humans do mistakes by nature?

And I agree that Sage Durvasa is also to be blamed. What kind of boon did he give a teenage girl for the service she did him? It turned out to be a boon for her later since Pandu could not have kids, but it was also a curse for the poor girl. Wasn't it Durvasa's responsibility to tell Kunti about the consequences of the mantra? He should have given her strict instructions on when to use the mantra, and also a warning not to take it lightly.

Kunti is not the only one responsible for Karna's plight. Two others were equally responsible but as usual, it's the woman who has to bear the full brunt.

And as you can see, that this is not true only in Kunti's case.

Agreed!

As people are pointing out, he did what he could. But, if it was up to him to chose a good home for his son, then why not a Kshatriya Family? His son was not meant to be raised as a Suta, he was going to grow up to be a warrior, so why not chose a family for him accordingly?

And say, he wanted to honor Kunti's wish to be not revealed as the mother, but he very well could have revealed the identity of the Father. Kunti saw Karna after Rangbhoomi but Surydeva was always there, ever since he was a child.And if Drona refused Karna the knowledge of Brahmastra or whatever it was, Suryadeva could have at least revealed himself as the Father, privately to Drona.

Rishi Durvasa could have handed the Mantra to her family, her Father or any elder in her family too. It is not a great deal of bother to at least warn her '' Use it, have a baby, don't want a baby? don't want to be a mother at present?don't use it. Consult your elders, before Marriage. Get married, take permission from your husband, then use it."

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".