Counter Arguments on claims of story distortion/ DT's Nt pg 10

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

TheWatcher

@TheWatcher

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#11

I dont know why but i agree with point no.4 , They showed Drona's inner feelings quite nicely,But rest of the points are Purely Fictional.

Edited by TheWatcher - 11 years ago

Quote

Debasree

@debasree04

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#12

what a justification !!! 🤣
Why don't they provide us that "ORIGINAL" version of Ved Vyas because we cant find it in the market...we should read that one !!! 😈

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Medha.S

@Medha.S

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#13

Well, apart from the krishna-arjuna track two weeks before, which was completely fiction in relation to mahabharat and had nothing to do with it.
One idiotic distortion was showing drona not accepting karna as a student when karna had learn archery from drona with all the others.
It was only when drona refused to teach him brahmastra, that he went to parshuram.Drona was karnas teacher too.All the tension between drona-karna was so stupid.Both talking to each other so cuttingly and karn taunting drona 😆

Quote

Vrish

@Vr15h

Stunner

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: mythili2
😆 they r adding all stupid fictional tracks n nw saying tat it frm original text.. ...

Like Arjun attending Rukmini haran as Brihannala - or Subhadra being thrown into a ravine by Kalyavan? 😆 Not to mention, Vidura & Bheeshma being angry w/ Arjun for attacking Karna when insulted?

I think they've decided to keep digging themselves deeper into a hole, thinking that if they dig deep enough, they'll come out of the other end of the earth - wherever the antipode of Jaipur is 😆

Edited by .Vrish. - 11 years ago

Quote

Mythili

@mythili2

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Like Arjun attending Rukmini haran as Brihannala - or Subhadra being thrown into a ravine by Kalyavan? 😆 Not to mention, Vidura & Bheeshma being angry w/ Arjun for attacking Karna when insulted?

I think they've decided to keep digging themselves deeper into a hole, thinking that if they dig deep enough, they'll come out of the other end of the earth - wherever the antipode of Jaipur is 😆

seriously they r showing rubbish n saying tat ppl shud read original text...biggest joke in itself😆😆...

@bold 🤣🤣

Quote

halfbloodprince

@Wistfulness

Achiever

+ 8

Posted: 11 years ago

#16

As per the original text -

- Devavrata was 16 when Ganga returned him to Shantanu.

- He was the crown prince already when Satyavati entered.

- The conditions were put forward by Dashraj.

- Vichi died after ruling for seven years.

- Satyavati never treated Vidur as inferior, he was equally important.

- Dhrit never treated Vidur in such a weird way. He respected him and all the elder people.

- Karna wasn't grown up to welcome Kunti.

- Kunti never really cared about Karna.

- Karna wasn't named Karna by his parents.

- Satyavati never went to look for Pandu.

- She never had a confrontation with Ganga.

- Lord Shiva didn't stop the duel between Bheeshma and Parashurama.

- Vidura understood the Lakshagraha plot by himself...not because Karna's expressions hinted so.

- Bheeshma never knew about the Lakshagraha.

- Subhadra met Arjuna during his exile.

- Ashwatthama wasn't a villain.

- He never went to meet Shakuni.

- Bhima returned on the 8th day after Duryo poisoned him.

- Shakuni wasn't involved in that plot.

- Krishna and Kalyavan's entries were distorted too.

- Arjun had nothing to do with Rukmini haran.

- He became Brihannala during the Agyaat vaas, due to a curse.

- Yudhi and Bhima were the heroes of Lakshagraha.

- Pandavas lived there for 1 year.

- Fire was set by Bhima and all escaped through the tunnel constructed by a miner appointed by Vidura.

- There was no duel in the Rangbhoomi except the friendly one between Duryo and Bhima, as both were mace fighters. Ashwatthama separated them as it was getting fierce.

These are just a few..

Quote

simplysappie

@simplysappie

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: Abhishek_King
@thewatcher thanks for posting it hre...one formal qu. if they r showing everything according to the original text, then why Krishna n Draupadi of the show r shown fair????👎🏼

that's a million dollar question ... Evn I'm asking that ...

Quote

Manoj

@Manojie

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#18

This was my response to their status:

I have read the Mahabharat (A number of versions) And I am saying what you're showing is total and utter bukvaas!

Let's take Lakshagreh for one example:

Vidur KNEW of the plot BEFORE Pandavs left for Varnavart. He gave cryptic clues to Yuddhistir. He then sent him a messenger (who was also a miner) the miner built a tunnel out of the lakshagreh. They didn't dig out of the lakshagreh whilst it was burning!!

Secondly, it wasn't Kunti's decision to fake their deaths. That too was Vidur. He wanted the Pandavs to strengthen themselves and show themselves again once they were stronger. Otherwise Dhuryodhan would have continued making attempts on their lives. They were in no position to openly challenge Dhiritashtra.

Thirdly, there are various versions that state various things about the bodies that were found in the Lakshagreh. (Some say they were Nishad people Kunti poisoned, some say they were servants who were Dhuryodhan's allies, some say Purochan's sister and sons, etc.) However the fact is the Pandavs set fire to the Lakshagreh themselves. They didn't dig their ways out whilst the Lakshagreh was on fire.

I can pick more flaws with Lakshagreh, but if you're going to say people who have read the Mahabharat aren't criticising it, then you are telling LIES, just like the creators of this serial!

Quote

Manoj

@Manojie

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Like Arjun attending Rukmini haran as Brihannala - or Subhadra being thrown into a ravine by Kalyavan? 😆 Not to mention, Vidura & Bheeshma being angry w/ Arjun for attacking Karna when insulted?

I think they've decided to keep digging themselves deeper into a hole, thinking that if they dig deep enough, they'll come out of the other end of the earth - wherever the antipode of Jaipur is 😆

They might be trying to dig themselves out of a burning building. Exactly as their Pandavs do 😆

Edited by Manojie - 11 years ago

Quote

Nripendra

@Abhisheking

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

#20

Originally posted by: -Shruti
As per the original text -

- Devavrata was 16 when Ganga returned him to Shantanu.

- He was the crown prince already when Satyavati entered.

- The conditions were put forward by Dashraj.

- Vichi died after ruling for seven years.

- Satyavati never treated Vidur as inferior, he was equally important.

- Dhrit never treated Vidur in such a weird way. He respected him and all the elder people.

- Karna wasn't grown up to welcome Kunti.

- Kunti never really cared about Karna.

- Karna wasn't named Karna by his parents.

- Satyavati never went to look for Pandu.

- She never had a confrontation with Ganga.

- Lord Shiva didn't stop the duel between Bheeshma and Parashurama.

- Vidura understood the Lakshagraha plot by himself...not because Karna's expressions hinted so.

- Bheeshma never knew about the Lakshagraha.

- Subhadra met Arjuna during his exile.

- Ashwatthama wasn't a villain.

- He never went to meet Shakuni.

- Bhima returned on the 8th day after Duryo poisoned him.

- Shakuni wasn't involved in that plot.

- Krishna and Kalyavan's entries were distorted too.

- Arjun had nothing to do with Rukmini haran.

- He became Brihannala during the Agyaat vaas, due to a curse.

- Yudhi and Bhima were the heroes of Lakshagraha.

- Pandavas lived there for 1 year.

- Fire was set by Bhima and all escaped through the tunnel constructed by a miner appointed by Vidura.

- There was no duel in the Rangbhoomi except the friendly one between Duryo and Bhima, as both were mace fighters. Ashwatthama separated them as it was getting fierce.

These are just a few..