Counter Arguments on claims of story distortion/ DT's Nt pg 10 - Page 10

I agree with Vrish! The sacrifce Drupad made for Draupadi's honour was something that cost him everything. How dare they have the audacity to portray him such a light.

Originally posted by: Smita_R

@simplysappy Not just high budget, even if it is a low budget project, they have no business cooking up fake stories. When i said i made peace with the serial it doesnt mean i accept watever crap they throw at us, it means i'll watch it without getting affected mentally & spoiling my health but still make a protest abt it like you guys...

I think that awful page is talking more about the real story now. They are agreeing that the story Starbharat is showing is bukvaas;

Those sensible enough will be compelled to do their research if they are unfamiliar with the Mahabharata history, those who arent bothered will buy into anything and in a way the cvs are abusing their power to legitimise their fictional narratives in the name of The Mahabharata. It's funny how they have conveniently ignored some of the more glaring errors, such as the misrepresentation of Drupad, Subhadras early introduction, Kunti and Karnas early encounter, Kuntis fault being glossed over by having this convenient maid who makes her decisions in the keeping secret of Karnas identity amongst many more other fabricateions. It's one thing to say they are interpreting the emotions that may have naturally transpired its another to completely reinvent the characters disposition and their history, or make victims out of them when its not needed or sacrifice depth for melodrama seeing as how everything is sensationalised. Whoever claims the serial is an authentic portrayal are deluding themselves. I only hope the cvs learn and avvoid distorting it too much for the future episodes.