*Season 2, Week 29* Analysis Thread

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

thedramaqueen

@thedramaqueen

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#21

Originally posted by: sjain
zara tubelight hoon main it takes time babes 🤔
no worries.. I wasnt articulating myself too well either

Yes Apparently According to me bringing Ishwari was not for highlighting financial matters or having bank balance of her own ( thats different thing all together)..Here her reference of Ishwari was to just say how strong determined yet a multitasker she was..But apparently yes Dev took it in a different direction..

That is exactly what I am saying too.. Sonakshi gave ishwari's example to Dev to demonstrate how a child looks up to their parents. But because of Dev's deep wounds in this regard (being able to take care of his mother), the discussion went into finances

as Ishwari worked because they has money issues if his fathr had been their Ishwari would have been living a normal life of a housewife..just cooking and taking care of kids not struggling every day to survive..Niether she nor he..they both were not trying to show themselves superior to each other in anyway..Everything that belongs to Dev is Sona's and what Sonakshi has is rightfully Dev's too..Whether its money fame power success achievement

@Bold - the makers have so far always shown Sonakshi unsure of her financial status. I think there is a certain degree of inferiority there. However, that is not Dev or Sonakshi's point here. Its gone into a tangential direction for us viewers

Edited by thedramaqueen - 8 years ago

Quote

gmgi

@gmgi

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#22

@ Shaavi

In India, there are 2 epics which are considered as god's commandments. Which tells us how we are supposed to live. Which are holy to us. They are Ramayana and Mahabharata. While Ramayana emphasized on dharma(morality), Mahabharata gave importance to karma(values and duty).

In Ramayana Rama sent Sita based on the words of a dhobhi who pointed fingers at her virtue. He chose to believe an outsider against his own family, his wife in the name of protecting dharma. Sonakshi is very much influenced by this. She is like Rama and went with Vickky said as the truth. In Mahabharata, Arjuna fought against people who were his own family for for the sake of what they called their own in the name of karma. And Krishna endorsed what Arjuna did as the right thing to do through Bhagavadgita. Dev threw Vickky out as he harmed whom he called family.

So who is right, Rama or Krishna as both are worshipped as gods. But the interesting thing is there is Rama and Sita statue along with Shiva's in IN, while Bijoy was shown lighting diya in front of Krishna. I am really liking this interesting concept that they are showing.

Each of Lord Vishnu's incarnations had its own purpose and message most apt for the different "Yuga's". Sri Rama is considered the best son, the best brother, the best friend etc but not the best husband. This we get if we take his actions at the most superficial layer. But if we look deep we will see differently. By his actions though he gave the illusion of wronging his wife he protected her from the very accusation aimed at her. Even after centuries we still point our fingers at Sri Ram but even now Sita is considered the epitome of purity. By choosing to be a one woman man though a prince with choices, keeping her statue in gold with him showing to the very people who pointed fingers at her chastity that for him she was just as pure as the gold that came out of the fire he turned the table on them. He showed that if the society expects women to be in their limits then a man should also follow the same. I would quote Shruthi a brilliant analyst in SKR forum " If Sri Krishna openly broke the existing rules and norms of society, Sri Ram broke them by providing an illusion of not breaking them."

And Sonakshi as you said did believe Vicki. But when she questioned Dev, he himself accepted that he did this. So he too believed Vicki isn't it? So who was he like then?😉

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

sjain

@sjain

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 8 years ago

#23

DQ will be reading replying later..Thanks for replying hmm :P

Quote

Shaavi

@Shaavi

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#24

Originally posted by: gmgi

And Sonakshi as you said did believe Vicki. But when she questioned Dev, he himself accepted that he did this. So he too believed Vicki isn't it? So who was he like then?😉

Geena, both Dev and Sonakshi were referring to two different things with two different interpretations. Sonakshi was referring to the actual eviction, while Dev was talking about the check and the loan. He only knew that Sonakshi had taken a loan and Bose family had mortgaged their house to do so. He thought that IDC had only brought the house and loan, not that Bose family were thrown out in the street in the middle of the night. What he thought was Bose family did not want to live in a house owned by Dixits, so they left. That Sonakshi came to talk about how his company brought their house. And there by forcing them to leave it. He didn't know that Vickky had personally gone there and had asked them to vacate the premises in the night. In the episode with Vickky's truth coming out, both Dev and Ishwari were shocked to know that Bose family was thrown out. In their room, that is what Dev questioned Sonakshi, as to why she didn't tell him such a huge thing.. And that is the very same reason, why Ishwari is now not budging to RR's tears. Her own experience of being out on the street is haunting her. She hasn't questioned RR till now as the later has been shown crying and she doesn't want to do that now. But if RR further talks in the same way as she is doing and expects Dev and Ishwari to let Vickky come back, then Ishwari will definitely question her.

As to the other thing, I did add additional thoughts in the previous thread as well as this thread too. 😊

From my perspective Dev although by name means Bhisma, acts like "Pandavas" of Mahabharata. He shows different traits from all the 5 brothers.

Edited by Shaavi - 8 years ago

Quote

gmgi

@gmgi

Rocker

Posted: 8 years ago

#25

Originally posted by: Shaavi

Geena, both Dev and Sonakshi were referring to two different things with two different interpretations. Sonakshi was referring to the actual eviction, while Dev was talking about the check and the loan. He only knew that Sonakshi had taken a loan and Bose family had mortgaged their house to do so. He thought that IDC had only brought the house and loan, not that Bose family were thrown out in the street in the middle of the night. What he thought was Bose family did not want to live in a house owned by Dixits, so they left. In the episode with Vickky's truth coming out, both Dev and Ishwari were shocked to know that Bose family was thrown out. In their room, that is what Dev questions Sonakshi. And that is the very same reason, why Ishwari is now not budging to RR's tears. Her own experience of being out on the street is haunting her. She hasn't questioned RR till now as the later has been shown crying and she doesn't want to do that now. But if RR further talks in the same way as she is doing and expects Dev and Ishwari to let Vickky come back, then Ishwari will definitely question her.

As to the other thing, I did add additional thoughts in the previous thread as well as this thread too. 😊

From my perspective Dev although by name means Bhisma, acts like "Pandavas" of Mahabharata. He shows different traits from all the 5 brothers.

Sorry Shaavi. But they all knew. Ishwari clearly asked him " Sir pe chat ka na hona tu nahi jantha hein kya Dev"? Episode 229

Quote

JShukla

@JShukla

Inactive

Posted: 8 years ago

#26

Shaavi- probably my first response to you:-)

You said this-"both Dev and Sonakshi were referring to two different things with two different interpretations. Sonakshi was referring to the actual eviction, while Dev was talking about the check and the loan. He only knew that Sonakshi had taken a loan and Bose family had mortgaged their house to do so. He thought that IDC had only brought the house and loan, not that Bose family were thrown out in the street in the middle of the night. What he thought was Bose family did not want to live in a house owned by Dixits, so they left. That Sonakshi came to talk about how his company brought their house."

this is totally different from how it happened.

Dev asked Sonakshi to 'get Out"

She went.

Vikki didn't let Dev Call Sonakshi and got him Drunk. He made Dev sign the eviction documents in drunken stupor.

Then Vikki went in the night and threw Boses out saying Dev asked him to do so.

Then Sonakshi went breathing fire and brimstone to IN and said 'bahla bura' and listened some 'bhala bura' to and from Ishwari and she also said that Dev evicted them from Bose house. Ishwari told her he is at farm house.

Ishwari herself met Dev and told how he could make Boses homeless. Vikki then made his believe that he actually did it. Ishwari then also asked him to chose between family and Sonakshi and handed the 'Dev-signed-prenup' papers to Dev. Everyone left. Dev asked Vikki to throw away prenup.

Sonakshi came and said 'Bhala bura' about making them homeless. Dev felt guilty coz he actually thought he did this despicable act.

then he also made a gesture of actually hitting Sonakshi, but didn't actually... then magalsutra throwing, Sonakshi signing prenup and Dev spouting weird accusations at her.

So in a nut shell , Dev knew Boses were thrown out because Vikki told him 'Bhai aapne insist kiya ki mein raat mein hi jakar unka saman bahar phek doon'

Quote

Shaavi

@Shaavi

Voyager

Posted: 8 years ago

#27

Originally posted by: gmgi

Sorry Shaavi. But they all knew. Ishwari clearly asked him " Sir pe chat ka na hona tu nahi jantha hein kya Dev"? Episode 229

That is exactly what I am saying Geena. He thought they did not want to stay there because it was owned by him. That he had hurt their self respect. He did not think that she meant it literally. But she was referring to what happened literally. And Dev was not aware of that fact. And that is how Ishwari understood too and talked too. Vickky played his cards correctly at that time. He understood, both of them and used their weaknesses against them.

Quote

Harryfan011

@Harryfan011

Explorer

Posted: 8 years ago

#28

@Lakshmi, I am happy that you have so openly expressed your dislike against a particular section (paragraph) about my post... (in your post that you have posted in the previous week's thread)

I know that we don't agree on a lot of things especially, when it comes to Dev's way of loving Sonakshi...

Like I said in my previous post, I analyze Dev from a different angle and perspective... And, hence, I don't think our way of thinking will ever coincide...

But, this doesn't mean that I don't enjoy reading your post... Since, your way of looking at the story and characters are so different than mine, that I naturally become fascinated about reading your opinions...

And, as for my stupid comment, about how 'you ruined my day' was nothing but a over-reaction from an adult who was acting like a 6 year old brat, who was unable to handle a different perspective... Since, you still remember my words, I know that I must have hurt you deeply...

And, I am sorry for causing you pain with my stupid remarks... I hope that we can forgive & forget about my words that I said to you...

-Suyash.

Edited by Harryfan011 - 8 years ago

Quote

ltelidevara

@ltelidevara

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#29

Shaavi

You are right. Dev did not know that Vicky personally went there and did it. Hence he was shocked and furious when the truth came out. He thought since Boses value their self respect they must have vacated the house. Till Vicky admitted it Dev was under that impression only.

Lakshmi

Quote

ltelidevara

@ltelidevara

Sparkler

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#30

Suyash

I was not hurt. I remember it still because I want to be extra cautious since then. Hence I stopped commenting on your posts.

I agree with you our way of looking at Dev is widely different.Quite a few people in the forum perceive the way I do. And I am okay with it as I have very strong notions about Dev,his ch. his behaviour his extremities and his positives.

I feel I am able to convey my point.

Good luck

Lakshmi