*Season 2, Week 3* Analysis Thread - Page 7

Originally posted by: Shaavi

I have a some doubts. I was watching the episode where Dev tells maami and co that it was Sonakshi who brought his building.

In that episode Vickky said that he sold his 49% shares. Were they shares of Dev's company. If so is Sona now partner of Dev's company. I mean I thought Vickky just sold part of the building and he did that thinking he has that power because of that 49% shares. Can anyone please clarify if Sona did buy that 49% of shares from Vickky or is only owner of that building or was that 49% actually percentage of the building space or was it a goof up by the CVS.

The other thing is in the episode where Dev announces that he is closing the trading company, he says to Vickky that he is not closing his 400cr company. In the above mentioned episode xGKB says that her "red" has finally become a "karodpathi". So is Vickky not yet a karodpathi and is aspiring to become one?. Does it mean that Dev just made him the CEO and so Vickky is just supposed to take care of Dev's company as his proxy. Does it mean that Vickky is still poor compared to Dev and Sonakshi?

Can someone help me. I am totally confused... 😳 😕

Originally posted by: LiveLife321

@shaavi, is it that simple to sell company property even if we consider that there is no bod, their legal department won't come to know about this deal before registration. It's the same legal department who came up with prenup when they got the news that their boss is going to get married. It's too weird to accept that vikky finished entire deal with out any one getting any information about this.

Originally posted by: Shaavi

I will explain. In a company the majority shateholder calls the shots. Minority is nothing. But would have appreciated Dev if he had transferred only 24% of the companies shares to vicky as for lots of important matters like selling of major part of assets, taking loans in excess of certain limits, change of objects etc etc, approval of more than 75% is required.

Vicky had 49% shares and hence no decision making power. That is why Dev told him that he would get arrested for fraud and misappropriation of funds.

Also, since I am assuming this is a closely held company and not listed and I am again assuming that balance 51% are held only by Dev, vickys 49% is of no value as he can't appoint a single director. Bit yes if tomorrow Dev decides to sell even five percent to a bank for a loan, vicky can easily overthrow him by joining hands with the bank.

One person can incorporate several companies. I think traditng company was a different company all together instead of a department. Also there can be several subsidiary companies and one holding company which has the controlling shares of all these companies. For example Tata sons.

But I don't think cvs have invested so much thought process in this they are just using loose words like company wherever convenient.

Originally posted by: Shaavi

One more thing I feel is as much as Dev was responsible for the breakup and the bitterness, Sonakshi was equally responsible(just my POV. Not intended to say that Dev was right or that he did not make any mistakes). If only Sonakshi trusted him enough when they were married to let him see the real her, talk about her insecurities, her fears and her vulnerabilities, they could have been really happily married even with Ishwari's interference.

Originally posted by: JShukla

I understand how Sona- Dev(they are not Devakshi for me anymore😛) spat is viewed on equal terms. I viewed it as a victim finally standing up to a powerful bully. I am not good with debates or convincing someone with my POV. so will not venture there.

However, what is the take on firing a poor security guard? ... Just wondering.

Oh and btw, people with no MBA(not even college graduates-Bill Gates), peopel with engineering background(Mr Murthy's Infosys), etc. all make it good in the business world... There are many but don't have the time to quote

I firmly believe a nutritionist can do business and good business at that.

Originally posted by: Danseuse

It wouldn't be right to question Sonakshi's business acumen because Creatives have not revealed anything yet, on how she managed to build a successful business in 7 years, to earn the Businessperson award. So that's not a debatable point yet.

Well, I think Dev built a successful business in close to 5-6 years and got awards. If we remember, the award function where he took Sona and Ish was one of the many award functions where he was invited. He was even featured and top entrepreneur. My question is why believe one and question another. Anyways, I believe she worked hard. She was always shown as focussed, hard working and intelligent. Itna kafi hai.

The question is, has she learnt everything associated with building and running a good business? Maybe not. Looking for an office space in a good business district, is one of the important kick start of a continuation of a successful business. Did Sonakshi get this right? Is she hell-bent on proving only to Dev that she has done admirably good for herself in the last 7 years, that she chooses to come and share office space with him? Esp. when she has experienced his attitude and impulsive behaviour? Moreso, because she knows that Dev is not privy to Suhana!!! What does Sonakshi want from Dev?

I think she did not realize how much of a trouble Dev can actually be. I am willing to bet that there was a very good analysis done with regards to getting area, prime locations, probable proximity to their business associates, close to area where most employees reside, perhaps it is in Govt's special economic zone, etc... I don't think they can show all.

Firing the security guard is probably, just another way to deal with identity crisis, as Dev still believes that he owns the building and is not willing to part with it. Just like he believes that Sonakshi is only his. 😃

Well Sonakshi is her own person before being someone's


-Rekha