Originally posted by: tia.o
To answer your question first, in Canada a valid ground for divorce would be, in similar circumstances, if a wife held a knife on the husband's neck to force him to leave his family. Because then she used violence against him in the form of threat.
How else can you force someone to do something they don't want to do? Apply physical force which in most cases don't work on adult men by adult women.
You can refuse to live with your husband's family and ask your husband to move out with you. That is not a force. That is a demand.
Now if the man refuses to move out, he can get divorced provided they split their entire marital property in half and hand over her half of everything.
That's how it will work in Canada. If my husband tells me to get out for whatever reason, I can leave and go to the nearest hotel (I won't be at the street begging), call a lawyer who will fight my case pro-bono which means free of cost to me. Everything since our marriage we acquired plus the marital house will be assessed and split in the middle and I will have my share to live my life even if I am a housewife and my husband is the sole earner.
Why? Because in Canada husband and wife are considered an unit by law. If a husband earns money, the wife turns that money into food, raising children and other household tasks and the same applies to stay at home husbands. So it's not just the husband's money or the wife's money, it's the family's money.
Coming back to your point. In a marriage if one party backs out because the terms they agreed on is no longer favourable, then as long as the marital property, money, providend fund etc. everything is divided in half and given to the party leaving that's fine. She can move on and so can he. Was there a provision made for that?
I can counter-argue that a husband promises to provide a safe, respectful and secured environment for his wife which due to his family, he failed to provide. So the terms were broken from his side first.
Of course you can't arrest in-laws without an arrest warrant and for that you need sufficient proof. It's not as easy as they show on TV. And if there's proof, they will be arrested and then they can get a bail within hours. Now if the proof is fake, then during investigation it will be revealed who trapped whom and proper party will be punished. So there is nothing to worry if you trust the law, police and judiciary system of your country. But if you have no trust in them, you should be worried. Since you trust them, I don't see the cause for concern there.
What I am saying here is the hardcore truth. That's not bad mouthing a country. Calling a lier, a lier is speaking the truth. Calling a truthful person a lier is bad mouthing. If speaking the truth tarnishes National pride then the nation needs massive fix. Because the truth itself is tarnishing its image.
You are right. Running away is not an option. The country needs to change, change it. It's upto you and other Indian living in India. By all means defend the country verbally, but take action to change the country's mentality starting with stricter law to protect women and leaders in power condemning violence against women and not endorsing it.
However, I thought after Nirbhaya incident it will happen. But everything died down. Did anyone ask her parents that if they would feel safe in their country or if they have an option to raise another girl elsewhere would they stay put in India? People who got victimized or who suffered the horror are never asked that question.
Do you know who is Suzette Jordan? No? She was a single mother of two children. She was a good mother who was raising her kids. But she is not famous for that. She is famous as Park Street Rape Victim. That became her identity. Because of that she continued to be raped by media, the society even after her rape incident was over.
Even chief minister of a progressive state of West-Bengal called her a lier and said she is tarnishing the National image for speaking the truth even though everyone of the accused were found guilty.
After the rapists were punished, she tried to live a normal life. She went to a restaurant and denied entry. Why? She was a rape victim.
So ask her daughters if they are given a chance to go live in another country would they still live in India?
I understand that you love India and for you it is the best place to live. I am not asking you to change your opinion. In fact I am happy for you.
But people who are safe and never faced any major trauma like you and me, are in no position to judge others and that includes my friend.