Definition of Gender - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

41

Views

3.6k

Users

20

Likes

292

Frequent Posters

gemini54 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#31
@rogerrocks
I always love the different perspective you bring to the table.
I am sorry if this is personal you quote a lot of Tamil films are you Tamil speaking?.. You dont have to answer if you dont want to was just curious
rogerrocks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#32

Originally posted by: gemini54

@rogerrocks

I always love the different perspective you bring to the table.
I am sorry if this is personal you quote a lot of Tamil films are you Tamil speaking?.. You dont have to answer if you dont want to was just curious


Yup I am..Basically mix of Mallu and Tamil 😆 But then I watch all kinds of films irrespective of the language..Serials test your patience like no other..Films are better that way 😆
gemini54 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#33
Originally posted by gemini54

@rogerrocks
I always love the different perspective you bring to the table.
I am sorry if this is personal you quote a lot of Tamil films are you Tamil speaking?.. You dont have to answer if you dont want to was just curious

Yup I am..Basically mix of Mallu and Tamil 😆 But then I watch all kinds of films irrespective of the language..Serials test your patience like no other..Films are better that way 😆

Thanks for answering the question did not mean to get personal..I am basically the same a mix of mallu and Tamil too. I love your way of thinking and enjoy your posts and what I love about this forum is that people with differing views co exist well and that is good.. This is the only forum I have been active on
Pehchaan.Kaun thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

I find this whole discussion extremely fascinating. Not from the point of view of this show but in general. Cos as far as soaps are concerned, most reactions are dictated by the fact that fans are emotionally invested in the lead couple and their chemistry. So more than gender discrimination and misogynist nature, its a simple case of fans not being able to see either of the leads with a third wheel. I mean there was this old Hindi show (which was ridiculous in every way but a rage back in the day 😆) where the girl was obnoxious in every which way..I mean that woman called her ex (the male lead) and made out with her husband (who she had no feelings for) just to prove a point 😆 And fans still shipped the two cos they had great chemistry..This is frankly nothing in comparison and like i said, more than gender disparity, most reactions are dictated by the fact that they are invested in the lead couple.


Now if we were to forget the show, chemistry and basically Dev-Sona-Ishwari for a moment and look at this as a stand alone situation, that is when i find most reactions quite fascinating. So a woman shouldn't be judged for attempting to move on after a break up..Agreed. Her love shouldn't be questioned just because she chose to move on within 5 days or 10 days or whatever. Agreed. In fact, i'd go as far as saying a woman has every right to move on quickly even if she was the one who initiated the break up and dumped the guy for whatever reasons..Even if it means she lost interest in the guy and couldn't see him that way anymore and even if he was an absolutely fabulous guy who made for the best boyfriend in the world..Its her choice at the end of the day..But then my question is why is a woman judged if she chooses not to move on? Why is that looked at as 'lack of self respect'? Trust me, am quite cynical and i believe that 'true love' or 'all consuming love where you cant think beyond your partner' is toxic and can destroy lives. But am also one of those who thinks 'to each his own'. I find it interesting that ppl think a woman lacks self-respect if she chooses to love a guy who ditched her/broke up with her for whatever reason(cos trust me ppl do lose their head and all sense of rationality in love😆 ). On the other hand, when a guy pines for the girl, its looked at as romantic. Why the discrimination? There is this film called Vinnathandi Varuvaya ( remade terribly in Hindi as Ek Haseena Thi) where the girl really treats the guy in a shabby manner and eventually moves on and marries another guy without even bothering to have a face to face conversation with her boyfriend (she tells him over phone that it wont work). Yet in the end when she asks him to move on, he says he tried. Still does but the way he felt when he saw her, he just cannot get himself to feel that way for another girl. Everyone found it romantic. Though i know for a fact that if the genders flipped and the girl was treated the same way and she still chose to love him, it would be looked at as regressive (I probably would judge the girl too 😆)..Like i mentioned earlier, i really do find the contrast fascinating which is probably why i ended up writing this essay😆 Just the difference in reactions when a girl moves on as opposed to a guy moving on..And at the same time, the opposite reactions when a girl chooses not to move on for whatever reason v a guy choosing to do the same..


I absolutely loved the perspective.. Have never really thought about it .. 🤓 I do find it romantic when boys do so.. And find it regressive when girls do the same 😕 That indeed makes me one of a kind of hypocrite eh 😒

But I agree with what you said.. To each of his own..😊 The importance and definition of lovelife is different to each.. And there is no standard duration for a lover to fall out of love with someone 😆 It's not right to judge a person if she takes 1 month or 1 week or 10 yrs to move on 😕 His/her wish..

@ Bold - I strongly feel you're talking about Sujal-Kashish from KTH is it so 😆
rogerrocks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: gemini54


Thanks for answering the question did not mean to get personal..I am basically the same a mix of mallu and Tamil too. I love your way of thinking and enjoy your posts and what I love about this forum is that people with differing views co exist well and that is good.. This is the only forum I have been active on


Hey no issues and thank you :) The discussions on this forum are a lot more interesting than the show at this point 😆

@Pehchaan.Kaun- No its not just you. All of us do that. We all talk about gender equality but we invariably end up judging both the genders differently in most situations. When a guy is obsessed with the girl, its passion and possessiveness. When a girl does it, she becomes a psycho girlfriend 😆

About the show, i was referring to Kaisa Yeh Pyaar Hai. Remember Angad-Kripa? 🤣 The only good thing about the show was Iqbal (he has the most gorgeous voice 😆)..That show was ridiculous though and Ekta kinda outdid herself with that scene..I mean which female lead sleeps with her husband and makes her boyfriend hear them do it over phone just to prove a point? 🤣
BoxedIn thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

I find this whole discussion extremely fascinating. Not from the point of view of this show but in general. Cos as far as soaps are concerned, most reactions are dictated by the fact that fans are emotionally invested in the lead couple and their chemistry. So more than gender discrimination and misogynist nature, its a simple case of fans not being able to see either of the leads with a third wheel. I mean there was this old Hindi show (which was ridiculous in every way but a rage back in the day 😆) where the girl was obnoxious in every which way..I mean that woman called her ex (the male lead) and made out with her husband (who she had no feelings for) just to prove a point 😆 And fans still shipped the two cos they had great chemistry..This is frankly nothing in comparison and like i said, more than gender disparity, most reactions are dictated by the fact that they are invested in the lead couple.


Now if we were to forget the show, chemistry and basically Dev-Sona-Ishwari for a moment and look at this as a stand alone situation, that is when i find most reactions quite fascinating. So a woman shouldn't be judged for attempting to move on after a break up..Agreed. Her love shouldn't be questioned just because she chose to move on within 5 days or 10 days or whatever. Agreed. In fact, i'd go as far as saying a woman has every right to move on quickly even if she was the one who initiated the break up and dumped the guy for whatever reasons..Even if it means she lost interest in the guy and couldn't see him that way anymore and even if he was an absolutely fabulous guy who made for the best boyfriend in the world..Its her choice at the end of the day..But then my question is why is a woman judged if she chooses not to move on? Why is that looked at as 'lack of self respect'? Trust me, am quite cynical and i believe that 'true love' or 'all consuming love where you cant think beyond your partner' is toxic and can destroy lives. But am also one of those who thinks 'to each his own'. I find it interesting that ppl think a woman lacks self-respect if she chooses to love a guy who ditched her/broke up with her for whatever reason(cos trust me ppl do lose their head and all sense of rationality in love😆 ). On the other hand, when a guy pines for the girl, its looked at as romantic. Why the discrimination? There is this film called Vinnathandi Varuvaya ( remade terribly in Hindi as Ek Haseena Thi) where the girl really treats the guy in a shabby manner and eventually moves on and marries another guy without even bothering to have a face to face conversation with her boyfriend (she tells him over phone that it wont work). Yet in the end when she asks him to move on, he says he tried. Still does but the way he felt when he saw her, he just cannot get himself to feel that way for another girl. Everyone found it romantic. Though i know for a fact that if the genders flipped and the girl was treated the same way and she still chose to love him, it would be looked at as regressive (I probably would judge the girl too 😆)..Like i mentioned earlier, i really do find the contrast fascinating which is probably why i ended up writing this essay😆 Just the difference in reactions when a girl moves on as opposed to a guy moving on..And at the same time, the opposite reactions when a girl chooses not to move on for whatever reason v a guy choosing to do the same..



Very interesting points raised here.

I watch this show off and on but gather that it has a more urban vibe than your average SP-Colors shows, and that Sona has been shown to be an independent woman of the times, brought up by a very open-minded family. A background like that raises certain expectations in the audience, I think. They would want her to react differently than, say, a Gopi Bahu or even an Anandi. I think we are all, to an extent, guilty of playing to the stereotypes on both ends...if a barely educated, small-town desi tv heroine is expected to be a doormat who stands by her man and his family at all cost and great sacrifices, an urban, educated, independent heroine is perceived to be "strong" and "self-respecting" and should stand up to every abuse and injustice directed at her in order to be "true" to her character, all without crying too much about it. On the surface, both these model heroines seem to be poles apart but dig a little deeper and you'll find that most of the audience demands perfection from heroines...different kinds of perfection, but impossible ones, nevertheless. 😆 Tbh this dichotomy exists in the characterisation of male leads too...there's a whole spectrum there from Sooraj/Ahem dikras to the worst of the Gul and Ekta bad-boy heroes, but the general consensus seems to be that as long as male leads are interesting in some way, no flaw in them is irredeemable, a leeway which female leads very rarely get.

Then, of course, there's the matter of who is watching the show, the target audience...a mostly young, internet-friendly viewership, which is well-versed in the popular contemporary discussions on feminism and gender politics etc, will take to characters in a different way than your more sedate, older viewer who watches tv for time-pass between chores and needs (melo)drama more than subtlety, nuance, or pc behavior. These are all general observations of course; exceptions exist everywhere.

With you about leaving each person to his own...everyone approaches relationships differently and it's no one's business judging them for it as long as they're not harming someone through their conduct. That said, I feel it is important for the audience to judge fictional characters in books, movies, tv shows, wherever...fiction is this safe space to examine our own prejudices and come across different parameters of examining human behavior. And the ensuing fan fights are sometimes fun! 😆
rogerrocks thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#37

Originally posted by: BoxedIn


Very interesting points raised here.

I watch this show off and on but gather that it has a more urban vibe than your average SP-Colors shows, and that Sona has been shown to be an independent woman of the times, brought up by a very open-minded family. A background like that raises certain expectations in the audience, I think. They would want her to react differently than, say, a Gopi Bahu or even an Anandi. I think we are all, to an extent, guilty of playing to the stereotypes on both ends...if a barely educated, small-town desi tv heroine is expected to be a doormat who stands by her man and his family at all cost and great sacrifices, an urban, educated, independent heroine is perceived to be "strong" and "self-respecting" and should stand up to every abuse and injustice directed at her in order to be "true" to her character, all without crying too much about it. On the surface, both these model heroines seem to be poles apart but dig a little deeper and you'll find that most of the audience demands perfection from heroines...different kinds of perfection, but impossible ones, nevertheless. 😆 Tbh this dichotomy exists in the characterisation of male leads too...there's a whole spectrum there from Sooraj/Ahem dikras to the worst of the Gul and Ekta bad-boy heroes, but the general consensus seems to be that as long as male leads are interesting in some way, no flaw in them is irredeemable, a leeway which female leads very rarely get.

Then, of course, there's the matter of who is watching the show, the target audience...a mostly young, internet-friendly viewership, which is well-versed in the popular contemporary discussions on feminism and gender politics etc, will take to characters in a different way than your more sedate, older viewer who watches tv for time-pass between chores and needs (melo)drama more than subtlety, nuance, or pc behavior. These are all general observations of course; exceptions exist everywhere.

With you about leaving each person to his own...everyone approaches relationships differently and it's no one's business judging them for it as long as they're not harming someone through their conduct. That said, I feel it is important for the audience to judge fictional characters in books, movies, tv shows, wherever...fiction is this safe space to examine our own prejudices and come across different parameters of examining human behavior. And the ensuing fan fights are sometimes fun! 😆


Your point about viewers expecting the female lead to be perfect is quite interesting. My issue with most Telly soaps is the exact opposite. The reason why a certain section seems okay with the male lead having flaws is because its highlighted as a flaw. Something which is wrong and which needs to be rectified/redeemed. Of course most shows have half baked redemption tracks but the mistakes are atleast acknowledged as flaws. On the contrary. most shows esp. Ekta and Gul K ones) have the habit of glorifying every single aspect of the female lead. Even annoying character traits like clumsiness, absolute lack of decency and decorum, crass behavior, overtly interfering nature, taking decisions on behalf of everyone and ruining multiples lives in the name of sacrifice etc. are all passed off as sanskari and mahaan. And worst case scenario, if the female lead effs up, the male lead is made to do something worse just so the balance always remains in favor of the bahu/female lead 😆 There are very few shows which don't follow that pattern. I would personally love to see shows where the both the leads are highly flawed and the female lead is not the overtly mature, perfect one with God complex provided both their flaws are acknowledged and eventually rectified/ dealt with in which ever way 😆

@bold - Agreed. Fortunately or unfortunately with soaps, in so far as the internet audience are concerned, most reactions are dictated by the chemistry and to what extent ppl are invested in the lead couple. Which is why we tend to give more leeway to fictional characters. Most ppl probably would hate an ASR/Asad/Manik/Dev in real life and there wouldn't be a love story in the first place. But given how its a soap, ppl are invested and you end up rooting for the couple irrespective of how many times they eff up 😆 The general audience of course doesn't give a damn so long as they get their share of drama 😆
BoxedIn thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Fascinator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#38

Originally posted by: rogerrocks


Your point about viewers expecting the female lead to be perfect is quite interesting. My issue with most Telly soaps is the exact opposite. The reason why a certain section seems okay with the male lead having flaws is because its highlighted as a flaw. Something which is wrong and which needs to be rectified/redeemed. Of course most shows have half baked redemption tracks but the mistakes are atleast acknowledged as flaws. On the contrary. most shows esp. Ekta and Gul K ones) have the habit of glorifying every single aspect of the female lead. Even annoying character traits like clumsiness, absolute lack of decency and decorum, crass behavior, overtly interfering nature, taking decisions on behalf of everyone and ruining multiples lives in the name of sacrifice etc. are all passed off as sanskari and mahaan. And worst case scenario, if the female lead effs up, the male lead is made to do something worse just so the balance always remains in favor of the bahu/female lead 😆 There are very few shows which don't follow that pattern. I would personally love to see shows where the both the leads are highly flawed and the female lead is not the overtly mature, perfect one with God complex provided both their flaws are acknowledged and eventually rectified/ dealt with in which ever way 😆


All this is very true. 😆 & that's exactly the point I was trying to make...how does the audience react when the nice, sensible female lead has a glaring flaw, say, the inability to deal with a break-up, and they try to build the plot around it? Even here, this whole discussion about Sona keeping her self-respect intact and moving on stems from the expectation of a certain kind of "perfect" behavior, isn't it? I wonder how the audience would react if she is shown completely unable to come to terms with losing her love and tries to bring Dev around, while her family points out how utterly pathetic and ridiculous her behavior is. 😆

@bold: That is a very futuristic vision for Indian tv. 😆 Although I have seen a couple of shows try, they almost always end up bowing to evil forces and mainstreaming it.
Edited by BoxedIn - 9 years ago
Tia.0 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago
#39
The true meaning of equality is what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. If Sona had dumped Dev for her family and Dev wanted to move on, no one would blame him. The break up did not happen because he fell out of love. Because then it's actually kindness to break up than string another person along just like he actually did with Natasha when he realized that he is in love with Sona. Natasha can't blame him for first getting engaged to her and then breaking it and go propose to Sona on the same night. She could be hurt yes. But can't blame Dev.

This particular break up happened because he took a decision to please another person's unreasonable demand without considering the person he is actually in relationship with. That's the problem. It's the same situation if he would have sent his mother to old age home because Sona demanded it without discussing it with his mother. Won't that be a crap thing to do? What would be the redemption then? He will have to miss his mother so that Sona would have understood what she had done. If in that scenario, Dev would have settled his mother in law as the new mother and live peacefully, will there be any redemption?

So that's why he needs to pine for Sona, why he needs to suffer. Because otherwise where's the consequences of his action? Where is his redemption?

Originally posted by: rogerrocks

I find this whole discussion extremely fascinating. Not from the point of view of this show but in general. Cos as far as soaps are concerned, most reactions are dictated by the fact that fans are emotionally invested in the lead couple and their chemistry. So more than gender discrimination and misogynist nature, its a simple case of fans not being able to see either of the leads with a third wheel. I mean there was this old Hindi show (which was ridiculous in every way but a rage back in the day 😆) where the girl was obnoxious in every which way..I mean that woman called her ex (the male lead) and made out with her husband (who she had no feelings for) just to prove a point 😆 And fans still shipped the two cos they had great chemistry..This is frankly nothing in comparison and like i said, more than gender disparity, most reactions are dictated by the fact that they are invested in the lead couple.


Now if we were to forget the show, chemistry and basically Dev-Sona-Ishwari for a moment and look at this as a stand alone situation, that is when i find most reactions quite fascinating. So a woman shouldn't be judged for attempting to move on after a break up..Agreed. Her love shouldn't be questioned just because she chose to move on within 5 days or 10 days or whatever. Agreed. In fact, i'd go as far as saying a woman has every right to move on quickly even if she was the one who initiated the break up and dumped the guy for whatever reasons..Even if it means she lost interest in the guy and couldn't see him that way anymore and even if he was an absolutely fabulous guy who made for the best boyfriend in the world..Its her choice at the end of the day..But then my question is why is a woman judged if she chooses not to move on? Why is that looked at as 'lack of self respect'? Trust me, am quite cynical and i believe that 'true love' or 'all consuming love where you cant think beyond your partner' is toxic and can destroy lives. But am also one of those who thinks 'to each his own'. I find it interesting that ppl think a woman lacks self-respect if she chooses to love a guy who ditched her/broke up with her for whatever reason(cos trust me ppl do lose their head and all sense of rationality in love😆 ). On the other hand, when a guy pines for the girl, its looked at as romantic. Why the discrimination? There is this film called Vinnathandi Varuvaya ( remade terribly in Hindi as Ek Haseena Thi) where the girl really treats the guy in a shabby manner and eventually moves on and marries another guy without even bothering to have a face to face conversation with her boyfriend (she tells him over phone that it wont work). Yet in the end when she asks him to move on, he says he tried. Still does but the way he felt when he saw her, he just cannot get himself to feel that way for another girl. Everyone found it romantic. Though i know for a fact that if the genders flipped and the girl was treated the same way and she still chose to love him, it would be looked at as regressive (I probably would judge the girl too 😆)..Like i mentioned earlier, i really do find the contrast fascinating which is probably why i ended up writing this essay😆 Just the difference in reactions when a girl moves on as opposed to a guy moving on..And at the same time, the opposite reactions when a girl chooses not to move on for whatever reason v a guy choosing to do the same..

AlooMatar thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#40
Well said!
If Dev was a good son, he should have told his mother about his feelings like Sona did. Instead he hid their relationship. And when Ishwari found out and had her anxiety attack, instead of evaluating their relationship, he broke up with Sona. Where this is the sense that? If he truly believed that his life would be wonderful with her, he could have easily told his mother whose favorite he was.
She was had the freedom to choose her life partner and when she did her family trusted her judgement. They let her pursue it without any fuss. Then when the relationship ended they tried to help her. For them helping her move on will ease her pain. For her she tried her luck with love and failed. Now she is giving her parents their chance.
There is no use in her pining for Dev because he has to work things out with his mom. She shouldn't feel threatened when he builds new relationships.Until he does no girl will be happy with him.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".