A Rare Gem! - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

73

Views

5.9k

Users

18

Likes

343

Frequent Posters

Sandhya.A thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: elasingh

Sandhya first of all Akbar was not the emperor of whole of Hindustan and secondly He accepted all the religions as equal in his quest for truth and sprituality but I am sorry Sandhya I wont call him hundreds of times more remarkable then Jo...I respect him and admire him but unlike others I do so inspite of his faults...He was a shrewd leader and consolidated the thrown for his children...I am sorry but I am just not as crazy a fan of his ...

I am not a crazy fan either. I very well know and accept that he had a whole bunch of shortcomings too. I cannot put him in the same league as the near perfect, extremely capable and handsome and intelligent and kind Raja Raja Chola who ruled over a greater part of South India and across seas 500 years before Akbar in whom there was hardly a grey shade. But he had everything almost perfect in life - very good parents, a very doting and very intelligent sister who with her husband spent her life for the welfare of his empire, a pleasant and respecting family and more importantly his loyal, obedient and very capable son.
But Akbar had none of these. A shattered childhood, selfish scheming family and a nafarmaan son. His mother and wives, his select courtiers and his awaam was all that he had. Yet he rose above petty differences.
Yes, he was a shrewd politician. His alliances with the Hindu Kings was as much for political benefit as much as it was for his acceptance of all religions. He could be ruthless if alliances and friendships didn't work out. Chittore is proof enough. But that too could be taken as for the greater good. Unless the whole country came under one leader, one flag, one nation, improvements in Arts, Literature. trade and commerce is impossible. The people cannot live in peace and prosper. All our Hindu Kings who ruled at that time placed their egos above the nation and its people. All resources were drained in wars among themselves. Akbar didn't. He didn't mind frienships with his enemies for peace. Here I can even cheer Bharmal. He placed his country above his ego and even his daughter. Bharmal may be a bad father but certainly a good king of Amer.
Ela, if Jo adjusted, she had to. Else she would have perished. There wasn't much of a choice. I certainly respect and admire her a lot for being a support and inspiration for Akbar, but Akbar was good and accommodating inspite of being at the helm. After having taken over Hindustan (okay, okay...most of it...may be not the South, but he had Afghanistan and Kabul and other northern provinces under him) he could have turned ruthless again. He could have become a Hitler. But he didn't. Nor did he loot India like Ghori or later the British. He made India his home and worked for its welfare with a rare far-sightedness and brotherhood. It was a choice that he made and that made him Great.
Edited by Sandhya.A - 11 years ago
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#52
I do not think even a comparison between Asoka and Akbar would bother me, Adiana, however invalid it might be for the reasons you have cited and others. It might well bother the mods, for that would be a historical discussion on this thread and would invite sanctions!

What bothers me in the clearly implied assertion that the Constituent Assembly members chose the Asoka symbols and not anything linked to Akbar because he was either seen as a foreigner or because he was not a Hindu. This, as I have tried to explain without much success, is simply not true, as can be shown from very well known facts. It also negates the very ethos that was the underpinning of our Constitution.

Moreover, I find this sudden complaint wrt the alleged neglect of Akbar among the Indian academia and public quite baffling. I do not suppose the Indian public spends its waking hours thinking about either of the 2 As😉, but 90% of India would admire them in a vague sort of fashion on any given day.

I agree with you about India being more than a country, an idea of all embracing inclusiveness. And this is not due to Asoka or Akbar. We have always been so, the aberrations having only served to highlight this norm.

Shyamala

Originally posted by: adiana12

Shyamala, I dont think there was any intent of comparing - in fact these two emperors cannot be compared - their circumstances and environments were different - and if they were in each other's situation, how they would respond is anybody's guess - as for the use of the Sarnath Pillar for the emblem - as I said the makers of the Indian constitution were wise enuff to choose that which signifies inclusivity as well as peace - ours being a pluralist country - and as for India - she is more than just a country - she is an idea, a concept - that celebrates difference by including all into her folds and both Akbar and Ashoka embodied this spirit of hers - and as long as India is Akbar will be and so will Ashoka and every such person who enbodies this spirit - India does not need time and space to exist just for this reason - all this said, yes there is a certain wave of intolerance and exclusion that is currently at play but then as they say 'the darkest hour of the night is before dawn' - perhaps this is that darkest hour !

elasingh thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#53

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

I am not a crazy fan either. I very well know and accept that he had a whole bunch of shortcomings too. I cannot put him in the same league as the near perfect, extremely capable and handsome and intelligent and kind Raja Raja Chola who ruled over a greater part of South India and across seas 500 years before Akbar in whom there was hardly a grey shade. But he had everything almost perfect in life - very good parents, a very doting and very intelligent sister who with her husband spent her life for the welfare of his empire, a pleasant and respecting family and more importantly his loyal, obedient and very capable son.
But Akbar had none of these. A shattered childhood, selfish scheming family and a nafarmaan son. His mother and wives, his select courtiers and his awaam was all that he had. Yet he rose above petty differences.
Yes, he was a shrewd politician. His alliances with the Hindu Kings was as much for political benefit as much as it was for his acceptance of all religions. He could be ruthless if alliances and friendships didn't work out. Chittore is proof enough. But that too could be taken as for the greater good. Unless the whole country came under one leader, one flag, one nation, improvements in Arts, Literature. trade and commerce is impossible. The people cannot live in peace and prosper. All our Hindu Kings who ruled at that time placed their egos above the nation and its people. All resources were drained in wars among themselves. Akbar didn't. He didn't mind frienships with his enemies for peace. Here I can even cheer Bharmal. He placed his country above his ego and even his daughter. Bharmal may be a bad father but certainly a good king of Amer.
Ela, if Jo adjusted, she had to. Else she would have perished. I certainly respect and admire her a lot for being a support and inspiration for Akbar, but Akbar was good and accommodating inspite of being at the helm. After having taken over Hindustan (okay, okay...most of it...may be not the South, but he had Afghanistan and Kabul and other northern provinces under him) he could have turned ruthless again. He could have become a Hitler. But he didn't. Nor did he loot India like Ghori or later the British. He made India his home and worked for its welfare with a rare far-sightedness and brotherhood. It was a choice that he made and that made him Great.

Sandhya frankly I respect Raja Raja chola...but now you are doing injustice to Akbar...For me Akbar is much greater...and Sandhya I agree that Jo had no other options but to adjust and Jalal had options...but that does not make Jo's adjustments any less...and one more thing Jallu inspite of taking part in hawans and burning fire in his home , still remained in his Islamic surroundings but Jo did not...Try to put urself in Jo's place...and you will find how hard it would have been for her to suddenly realise that she was going to marry into different religion and not just that inspite of having freedom to practice her religion she was out of hindu fold...Any way never have I said that Jo was greater then Jallu or Jallu was Jallu becoz of Jo...but where adjustments are concerned I feel that it was harder for Jo...
Sandhya.A thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#54

Originally posted by: elasingh

.

Sandhya frankly I respect Raja Raja chola...but now you are doing injustice to Akbar...For me Akbar is much greater...and Sandhya I agree that Jo had no other options but to adjust and Jalal had options...but that does not make Jo's adjustments any less...and one more thing Jallu inspite of taking part in hawans and burning fire in his home , still remained in his Islamic surroundings but Jo did not...Try to put urself in Jo's place...and you will find how hard it would have been for her to suddenly realise that she was going to marry into different religion and not just that inspite of having freedom to practice her religion she was out of hindu fold...Any way never have I said that Jo was greater then Jallu or Jallu was Jallu becoz of Jo...but where adjustments are concerned I feel that it was harder for Jo...

Ela
I too am saying the same. Raja Raja had everything almost fine in life. What does a king need more than an efficient and obedient son? Jallu was not blessed with any of these.😭
Also Jalal had also faced many oppositions regarding religion that Raja Raja didn't need to. Jalal's empire was larger, more prosperous and more complex and diverse. Also though initially regarded as a foreigner, Akbar slowly was hailed by the whole country in which the majority were of a different religion, as their own, to the extent that his rule was compared to Ram Rajya. Jalal also has the credit of overcoming differences and blending two religions and societies. Wasn't that why Jalal was 'Akbar'.😊
I don't underestimate the level of adjustments Jo had to make, but most of the princesses those days were married into different Empires and societies, if not religions. That was something that many of them faced. Akbar's other Hindu wives too did. So did ManBai, Mirza Koka's wife and many more too😕.
Edited by Sandhya.A - 11 years ago
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#55
Akbar was a pragmatic visionary, my dears, and both halves of his personality supplemented and complemented each other. Neither would have succeeded without the other in making him what he became, one of the giants of history.

If he had not had the grand vision that I wrote about in my Gordian Knot post, he would never have risen above a standard issue conqueror, a great warrior.

"He sees the whole of the Hindustan that he wishes to unite under his rule, not by brute force,but thru willing acceptance. Na ki shamsheer ki dhar se, par rishton ke reshmi dhagon me piroke.To win the heart of this Hindustan, he knows now what he has to do. For them to accept him, he has first to accept them.

Jalal already has the breadth of spiritual vision, the inner clarity, that lets him see his Allah in the Devi. Not many even today, anywhere in the world, are able to do that, for all the current politically correct patter about accepting all religions. And in the 16th century, when Protestants and Catholics were massacring each other and burning each other at the stake all over Europe and in England, for the Emperor Jalaluddin Mohammed to demonstrate such purity of thought, such innate humanisn, was nothing short of a miracle."

But if he had not had the pragmatism to marry high principles and the right means for implementing them, like his Rajput marriages and high office for able Hindus, his grand vision would never have taken flight, and he would have spent half his time fighting off rebellions against Mughal rule.

He was truly a rara avis, a colossus among men, and though he did have faults, they at least did not include feet of clay. And we in India are blessed that we had so many of his ilk down the centuries.

Shyamala/Aunty

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A


I am not a crazy fan either. I very well know and accept that he had a whole bunch of shortcomings too. I cannot put him in the same league as the near perfect, extremely capable and handsome and intelligent and kind Raja Raja Chola who ruled over a greater part of South India and across seas 500 years before Akbar in whom there was hardly a grey shade. But he had everything almost perfect in life - very good parents, a very doting and very intelligent sister who with her husband spent her life for the welfare of his empire, a pleasant and respecting family and more importantly his loyal, obedient and very capable son.
But Akbar had none of these. A shattered childhood, selfish scheming family and a nafarmaan son. His mother and wives, his select courtiers and his awaam was all that he had. Yet he rose above petty differences.
Yes, he was a shrewd politician. His alliances with the Hindu Kings was as much for political benefit as much as it was for his acceptance of all religions. He could be ruthless if alliances and friendships didn't work out. Chittore is proof enough. But that too could be taken as for the greater good. Unless the whole country came under one leader, one flag, one nation, improvements in Arts, Literature. trade and commerce is impossible. The people cannot live in peace and prosper. All our Hindu Kings who ruled at that time placed their egos above the nation and its people. All resources were drained in wars among themselves. Akbar didn't. He didn't mind frienships with his enemies for peace. Here I can even cheer Bharmal. He placed his country above his ego and even his daughter. Bharmal may be a bad father but certainly a good king of Amer.
Ela, if Jo adjusted, she had to. Else she would have perished. There wasn't much of a choice. I certainly respect and admire her a lot for being a support and inspiration for Akbar, but Akbar was good and accommodating inspite of being at the helm. After having taken over Hindustan (okay, okay...most of it...may be not the South, but he had Afghanistan and Kabul and other northern provinces under him) he could have turned ruthless again. He could have become a Hitler. But he didn't. Nor did he loot India like Ghori or later the British. He made India his home and worked for its welfare with a rare far-sightedness and brotherhood. It was a choice that he made and that made him Great.


Originally posted by: elasingh

Sandhya first of all Akbar was not the emperor of whole of Hindustan and secondly He accepted all the religions as equal in his quest for truth and sprituality but I am sorry Sandhya I wont call him hundreds of times more remarkable then Jo...I respect him and admire him but unlike others I do so inspite of his faults...He was a shrewd leader and consolidated the thrown for his children...I am sorry but I am just not as crazy a fan of his ...


adiana12 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#56
He was truly a rara avis, a colossus among men, and though he did have faults, they at least did not include feet of clay. And we in India are blessed that we had so many of his ilk down the centuries.

Shyamala, definitely he was this - otherwise how could he have collected the Navratnas in his court - men who were brilliant in their own areas that they could have given a lesser man a huge complex - and here we have a man, supposedly illiterate, having around him these brilliant gems who he managed to string together and yet not be dwarfed by them - how many men, that too kings / emperors / leaders can we say have such an ability - it more common to see the ones in the seat of power use brilliant minds but take the credit for their work themselves.

He gathered these minds around him to give shape to his vision - and they did make his vision a reality.
Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#57
Haila...how did I miss this. ...what an intellectual discussion going on amidst intelligent people...😃
Toh what am I doing here???😆
Sandhya.A thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#58

Originally posted by: sashashyam

Akbar was a pragmatic visionary, my dears, and both halves of his personality supplemented and complemented each other. Neither would have succeeded without the other in making him what he became, one of the giants of history.

Exactly..a right combination of the brain and the heart is needed to achieve and Akbar had both. He could be extremely kind and extremely ruthless...depending on the side you rub him. So well put aunty...both his halves complemented each other so well.

He was truly a rara avis, a colossus among men, and though he did have faults, they at least did not include feet of clay. And we in India are blessed that we had so many of his ilk down the centuries.

And this is what irks so much about the show...showing him spineless and brainless and crediting his begum and now the so irritating Mahesh Das. 😡 I wouldn't mind so much even if he was shown ruthless or cunning.

Shyamala/Aunty


Sandhya.A thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#59

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---

Haila...how did I miss this. ...what an intellectual discussion going on amidst intelligent people...😃

Toh what am I doing here???😆

Welcome...😊...just discussing the fascinating glow of a rare gem.😊
When I could be here, everyone else too can for sure.🤓
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
#60
You are here to add your irreverent tadka, my dear, for we are all slipping into hagiography!

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: Sandhya.A

Welcome...😊...just discussing the fascinating glow of a rare gem.😊

When I could be here, everyone else too can for sure.🤓

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".