Another paigam from Jodha to Jalal ... thankfully read by Moti! - Page 6

Originally posted by: skanda12

I think you've got one aspect slightly wrong. She was not vachan bound just to hide Sujamal's name, but she was vachan bound not to reveal Sujamal's existence in Agra at all.

Originally posted by: MaddyO

Ok my defence for MY JODHA - WHY CAN'T SHE SAY THINGS TO JALAL. HE HAS NOT APOLOGIZED TO HER YET FOR SAYING SUCH SHAMEFUL THINGS AND THINKING THEM ABOUT HER. It was his dream remember?

He even said she drank poison to hurt him, so even her almost giving up her life for him means nothing. He WILL NEVER SAY SUCH STUFF TO MA.

Jodha has ALL THE TIME just listened to insults, being wronged time and again and accused and when truth came out just waved off with sorry. MA & Rukayya insulted-insult her. Nobody bothers to see if their words hurt her. Why can't she say what hurt her to Jalal?

I am glad she is showing spine.
Jalal's dream meant - he was expecting her to forgive him instantly - he was expecting her to say you only said in anger, ok, paap etc. He was expecting after he pulled at her hair, shoved her, gave her dhakka, almost punched her, almost slapped her, cast ugliest doubts on her - that he will say sorry and she will kiss his tears away????????????????????

So he CLEARLY HAS NO IDEA AGAIN HOW MUCH HURTFUL HIS WORDS WERE. Ok he has reason he asked her but when she tried to say more after getting over shock he almost tried to punch her and did not let her say more than yes/no. Jodha went to tell him was ready to break vachan but he did not want to meet her.

If Jalal STILL ASKS FOR Ruk MA advice, still makes it 4 in relationship, still NEEDS somebody to tell him to go find Jodha? WHY!

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---

👏 ...yours is one of the most sensible posts that I have come across on this forum...👏

I am in a state now that I cant stand Jodha even for a minute.

There was time i used to wait for Jo-Ja scenes, Now it's become repulsive for the way she behaves.

Where on earth does the CVs get such pathetic ideas.

What Vachan has Jalal not followed. Is there any vachan in any culture which says, you go with some unknown men in midnight without letting anyone know. even after your husband asks lie to him. After all these husband should still trust ..

But infact isnt there a vachan that husband-wife should not hide anything from each other, Then what was Jodha devi doing? Did she follow all her promise?

She is very selective vachan following lady.

Even if there is a vachan to trust each other,,, Has she done it. How many times hasnt she blamed him.. skll.. mauka ka faida... daasi ko bhi nahe chodthe.. and the list goes one...

Did she even accept once that it was her mistake to hide the truth from her husband?

Jodha turning the table on Jalal as if its all his mistake is heights. Understand she is hurt and any women accused by her husband of adultry will not take it. But Jalal had all the reason. How many times he asked her, he literally begged to tell her trust. He gave all assurance. If she didn't trust her husband, if she gave the stupid vachan to her brother. Whose mistake is it, is it Jalal's or Jodhas?

Really loved reading your analysis!!! Hope this separation track brings out protective and possessive streaks in Jalal...also it would wonderful to see both jodha and Jalal learning the importance of each other in their life.

Originally posted by: Abie10

Mansi I loved your analysis and reading through Jodha's letter word for word. 👏👏 Her letter was calm and yet had lots of depth in it. The way Jalal turned with eyes widely open was when Moti read the part to Jodha's love confession.

So if consummation is going to happen in end of April or May, then Jo will all this while be at the jungle? Will Sherif succeed in kidnapping Jo? Will Maham sit and do nothing and let Jalal search for Jo and bring her back? 😕 So many questions.

Edit: Mansi, I forgot to mention, shouldn't Jodha have apologize to Jalal for not telling him the truth because of her vachan to Sujamal? I know she wanted Jalal to trust her but its not like she wasn't at fault.